“Special Report: Cancer Killer Ready to Breakout” (Kramer)

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, July 11, 2011

Today’s little tease comes to us from Hilary Kramer, who I briefly wrote about way back before the Gumshoe Vacation (that was the “Apple Killer,” which inspired a bit of discussion). This time she’s telling us that she’s got a “Cancer Killer” that’s ready to break out — and yes, killing cancer certainly sounds more important than killing Apple, regardless of how you feel about black turtlenecks and Adobe Flash … so who is it?

Here’s the intro:

“SPECIAL ALERT
“July 7, 2011

“The last time I recommended this stock, it rocketed 38% in just 3 days.

“I expect even bigger returns this time around.

“In an epic breakthrough, this little-known biotech company has developed one of the most exciting medical advances of the last 30 years.

“The treatment is so revolutionary and the impact so far reaching, it will blow you away.

“And today, the company sits on the cusp of receiving a coveted approval. After months of closed-door meetings, a crucial decision being released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services before the end of the month could cause this stock to soar literally overnight. You must get on board before this happens.”

Yeah, I know — July 7 was a few days ago … but even your favorite neighborhood Gumshoe needs a vacation now and then. And if it makes you feel any better, that “crucial decision,” as I read it, came out the week before Kramer’s “special alert” and the stock didn’t really “soar” just yet. Maybe she actually wrote this back in June and the ad folks just keep using it, since the “crucial decision” came at the end of last month, on June 30.

So who is it? One more bit of the hinty spiel:

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“Welcome to the Era of Personalized Medicine….

“We’re ushering in an era of personalized medicine that will see doctors and scientist will develop drugs specifically tailored only to you. The company I’m recommending today is far ahead of its competitors in doing just that.

“In an epic breakthrough, after decades of research, this small, little-known biotech company has developed one of the most exciting medical advances of the last 30 years—the first ever cancer vaccine.

“This is no ‘gee-whiz, someday in the future’ kind of thing…this drug is already approved and in use.

“The treatment takes a patient’s own cells and teaches their immune system to attack cancer cells the way it fights a virus.

“The company already has FDA approval to use the drug for a specific type of cancer today. But they are using the same proven technology to develop treatments for other types of cancer, including breast, ovarian and colon cancer.

“There is no doubt that when we look back ten years from now, this will be one of the biggest game-changers of the decade. And the company will deliver windfall profits to investors who get on board at the right price.”

This must be Dendreon (DNDN), maker of the FDA-approved Provenge for prostate cancer. This is indeed the cutting edge of cancer treatments right now, a personalized cancer vaccine that is created for each individual and delivered intravenously in a few doses over the course of a month … for $93,000.

Which is why the big issue had been, for many people, whether Medicare and Medicaid would cover the drug — those insurance programs are not allowed to consider cost in their coverage decisions (which is also why they can’t negotiate for better drug prices), and a preliminary decision had been made to extend coverage to Provenge for some prostate cancer patients several months ago, so the final decision on June 30 was expected by the market and didn’t impact the stock price much at all.

There’s a pretty good AP article about the Medicare/Medicaid decision here — basically, the drug will be covered for the indicated use (prostate cancer patients whose disease has progressed very far and who haven’t responded to other treatments), but might not be covered for “off-label” use, which as I read it would include “early” use in prostate patients as well as use against other cancers.

That still leaves a large market, with analysts estimating that revenues next year will come close to a billion dollars — and they do have other drugs in the pipeline, with the potential boost that some of them are using the same basic “personalized vaccine” technology as Provenge to fight colorectal, breast and ovarian cancers, which are among the biggies in terms of numbers of sick people. The fact that they’re using the same vaccine doesn’t necessarily mean that Provenge will be safe or effective in fighting these other cancers, but perhaps it will speed up the approval process somewhat compared to the extremely long and drawn out ordeal that Provenge had to go through as a “first of its kind” treatment.

And yes, that billion dollar revenue number does sound impressive — but this is a company that continues to have very high R&D costs and a market cap of nearly six billion dollars, so the expectations for Provenge are arguably “priced in” to some degree. Analysts are probably being conservative about revenue and earnings expectations, I would guess, since Provenge is still ramping up and, as a personalized medicine that needs fast turnaround, requires more production facilities (which each have to be FDA-approved — as some of them have been so far). So there could easily be hiccups, which may be why analysts are predicting that billion dollar (or nearly) sales number for next year, but not predicting growth after that. The prostate cancer patient pool is absolutely going to grow pretty quickly, with an aging population and extended lifespans that will make prostate cancer treatment more important for larger numbers of people, so you can probably justify making your own growth projections that might be a bit more ambitious for Dendreon if you like.

And yes, if the same basic technology and treatment turns out to be a powerful way to get after breast or colon cancer, that could potentially also drive much higher revenue. The other risk that you’ll often see noted is that it will also continue to drive politicians and regulators to look at the cost-effectiveness of health care, particularly cancer treatment. The impulse is to cover everything that can possibly be justified for cancer, since it’s such a terrible disease with such painful and harsh treatments, but as more and more drugs that cost $80-100,000/year (or per treatment) come out and inspire hope among patients (which also helps to drive off-label use — like that of Avastin, for example, which is still covered for off-label breast cancer use under Medicare despite the recent FDA decision that it was ineffective for breast cancer), and as the brutal necessity to control health care costs becomes more critical in the years ahead (we are, after all, out of money), it’s hard to imagine that we won’t have a more public debate about these expensive and designer drugs. That’s not to say that this debate will turn on a dime, or that it will hit Provenge specifically, but I bet we’ll hear pundits talking it up in future health care debates as folks grapple with the concept of how much an extra few months of life is worth, if only because Provenge and Avastin are among the more high-profile high-cost treatments.

So has the market failed to take into account the potential of a $1 billion+ sales year for Provenge, and future growth from that number, or is it priced in? How much are you willing to pay for that potential growth, and for the “maybe” of applying this cancer vaccine to other large populations? Let us know with a comment below.

And if you’ve tried out Hilary Kramer’s GameChangers, we want to hear what you think — share your opinion by clicking here to tally your rating over at Stock Gumshoe Reviews. Thanks!

P.S. Yes, for those who are asking, we’ve also written about Kramer’s “Stock of the Decade” — that’s the one that’s supposed to revolutionize the plastics industry, you can see the article here.


guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

28 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ELISSA JUNG
ELISSA JUNG
9 years ago

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY TO YOU AND YOURS.
HERE A GURU, THERE A GURE, EVERYWHERE A GURU
TELLING ME WHAT TO DO.
QUICK BUY, BUY, SELL,SELL
TRADERS SECRETS YOU WILL TELL.
STOP LOSS, OPTIONS, PUTS AND CALLS
WILL MAKE ME RICH BEFORE THE FALL.
HURRY, HURRY DON'T BE LATE
FOR MY SPECIAL RATE
AND THE NAME OF MY LUCRATIVE STOCK!!
UP, UP IT GOES AND THEN DOWN DOWN IT GOES
LIKE A SINKING ROCK!!

Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
5971
Flyfisher
Flyfisher
9 years ago

I believe Northwest Biotherapeutics (NWBO) has a drug currently in trials that has shown to be much more effective than Provenge, easier to produce, and cheaper.

Add a Topic
4665
Chris
Chris
9 years ago

ADXS is another similar play that I feel has great promise to become and surpass DNDN in the near future …

willie
willie
8 years ago
Reply to  Chris

do you really think that with the way things are , unless your wealthy to begin with , you can actually pull this off ? where do you live ?

Myron Martin
9 years ago

A "magic bullet" that will actually CURE cancer and restore health is a pipe dream that will likely never happen despite all the hype and propaganda to extract millions from gullible suitably frightened citizens to support drug company research.

The answer to cancer is PREVENTION, which means eating a sensible natural foods diet focussed on fruits, vegetables, nuts and whole grains while avoiding ALL forms of junk food, particularly processed meats, chemically preserved, artificial colours and flavours and other chemicals foreign to the body. If you don't have enough respect for your body to AVOID things known to be harmful and the discipline to eat healthy then indeed you should fear cancer and all the other PREVENTABLE lifestyle diseases that are filling our hospitals unnecessarily.

The answer is better nutritional EDUCATION, not more poisonous drugs, and in case you are wondering, there is no such thing as a "SAFE" drug with no side effects, they are ALL to some degree detrimental and in the longer term produce more harm than help.

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
5198
Melanie
Melanie
8 years ago
Reply to  Myron Martin

here, here.. well said!

Tom G.
Tom G.
8 years ago
Reply to  Myron Martin

There will never be a medical cure for cancer. There is too much money in it for the big pharmaceutical companies. There are natural cures for cancer, but that information is being kept from the general public.

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Dave
Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  Myron Martin

Cancer docs say that each type of cancer is, in effect, a different disease, so there will never be a single “cure for cancer”. There are some cancers whose rates would likely drop with a healthy lifestyle — eating as you suggested, but also avoiding excess body fat and staying physically active. There are other cancers that have little to with diet and are instead inborn (bad genes). Infection with certain viruses can cause cancer, stomach infection with Helicobacter is thought to increase risk of stomach cancer, exposure to sunlight or other UV sources increases risk of several skin cancers, occupational X-ray exposure is thought to increase risk, smoking of course, and there are plenty of substances that naturally occur in foods that can damage DNA and hence increase risk. It’s a complex picture.

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
hedy1234
hedy1234
9 years ago

Ahh the gumshoe is back!! We can all rest easy again :-))

who noze
who noze
9 years ago

goog to hear from you hup-e u had a wondwefall vacation WEICOME BACK U WERE MISSED

mpch
mpch
9 years ago

Myron, you have obviously never watched a cancer patient suffer or, worse still, lost a relative to this frightening illness. So until the cancer free generation, who has lived according to your preventative measures, emerges these patients will be grateful for every advance in this field and will trade the side effects for the desperatively hoped for pain relief. I certainly hope your organic production keeps you cancer free.

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Milt
Milt
9 years ago

ONTY P3 results this fall, NSC Lung Cancer DNDN like drug…DYODD and GL

Add a Topic
4555
Add a Topic
3397
jillybeansisme
9 years ago

While I agree with Myron that we should all lead a healthier lifestyle which will prevent many diseases, it will not necessarily prevent all diseases, including cancer. Sometimes these diseases are hereditary. Eating yourself to 500 lbs. will cause diseases such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, heart attack, organ failure, and stroke and these are preventable if you don't eat yourself to death. This doesn't mean if you maintain a reasonable weight you won't get the above mentioned diseases . . . it means you won't get them from overeating. You could still be hereditarily dispositioned to get the diseases. Same with cancer. NOBODY wants cancer, although yes, some do things to promulgate it (smoke). I say bring on all the research and types of medication possible so that the cost goes down.

I also want to say how horrible a battle cancer is and nobody ever should have to battle it. My sister lost her battle after 3 years. She had ovarian cancer. She suffered. None of the drugs worked for her.

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3515
Add a Topic
3820
Brewhound
Brewhound
9 years ago

Has anyone have any insight to this newsletter i received this am?

Dear reader,

When the history of cancer research is written, I'm confident Oncosec Medical (ONCS) will be the greatest unknown winner. Here's why…

ONCS has developed a new way of stopping cancer cells using a small field of electricity that makes the cancer cell absorb Bleomycin, a potent cancer killer.

Healthy cells are left unharmed! It's a breakthrough in treating devastating cancers of the neck, head and skin without resorting to painful and risky surgery that's now standard.
HERE'S WHAT ONCOSEC'S ASTOUNDING TECHNOLOGY OFFERS:

The ability to wipe out deadly cancer cells…Drastically, if not completely eliminating scarring and disfigurement… Surgery that took two hours can now take 15 minutes with this new technique…It costs up to 67% less…Healthy cells are saved, sick ones are destroyed.
These 4 spectacular benefits alone make OncoSec Medical, Inc. (ONCS) at around $1 a share a spectacular takeover candidate like Cougar Biotechnology that was purchased at $43 a share! I believe that OncoSec Medical could attract a $38 a share bid

Acquisition In the Biotech Field Are Going Through the Roof.
"We Expect This Trend to Continue. Small Biotech Companies
Are Game for Such Deals," Says Daily Markets

Daily Markets then says, "Companies have been looking towards biotech companies to build their product portfolios. Prime examples include Johnson & Johnson's acquisition of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc." Precisely. I'm predicting that this can happen to OncoSec Medical, Inc. (ONCS).

Do yourself a favor. Call your discount broker now and secure some of OncoSec Medical's stock before the word gets out. I'm predicting that this breakthrough will sweep the Internet.

YOUR TIMING IS KEY: Wall Street Looks for Stocks Like
OncoSec Medical, Inc. (ONCS) because They Know the
Profit Potential Is Absolutely Astronomical

Don't wait – the two most important words that can be said about this undervalued gem. At about a buck it is a screaming steal considering how bright its future is. Come join us!

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Stocks
Stocks
9 years ago

When I was looking into DNDN, I found it gave a 10% improvement in 3 yr survival vs a placebo (32.1 percent vs 23.0 percent)