Become a Member

“Buy China’s secret silver stock before it doubles”

Silver teaser from Nicholas Vardy's Global Bull Market Alert

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, January 19, 2011

Since there was such a spirited discussion following our look at the “treasure map” of hoarders who can sell you bags of “treasure”, this latest teaser from Nicholas Vardy also caught my eye.

Why? Well, because that “treasure map” bit was all about junk silver (old circulating silver currency), and the discussion was largely of the “hell in a handbasket” variety that we’ve also seen most aggressively from Porter Stansberry most recently with his “End of America” pitch about protecting yourself from hyperinflation, higher taxes, and dollar devaluation. And much of that relates to China, as the largest foreign holders of US debt and now our perceived rival for economic leadership, particularly with the recent baby steps toward making the Yuan an actual global currency.

So the little synapses in your Gumshoe’s brain jumped all over this — if silver is a hot topic, and China is a hot topic, wouldn’t the great Gumshoe Nation wish to hear about Chinese silver? Well, wish it or not, here it comes.

The pitch is that this stock has already gone gangbusters but isn’t about to stop:

“Why this stealth China stock tripled in 2009, doubled again in the last six months, and is poised to double again by Valentine’s Day”

And there’s nothing I like more than a stock that’s supposed to go crazy within a nice, short period of time — because then I have at least a small chance of remembering to check back in a month and see what happened, even if I never own the stock.

Plus, it’s just more fun — and more ridiculous — to promise a double within a month. Though, to be fair, it looks like Vardy has probably been pushing this idea for a little while — the teaser email that I’m looking at now was sent and received just this past weekend, but the text of the ad actually says that you have to get in “before December ends.”

(So perhaps he means next December so we have almost a year to think it over, and that it’s Valentine’s Day 2012 that will bring our “double?” Yeah, I don’t think so either, more likely just an overworked marketer forgot to update the dates in the ad.)

OK, so who is this “stealth China stock” that, we presume, should be doubling any minute now? Well, you can go subscribe to Vardy’s Global Bull Market Alert ($995) if you want the answer from the horse’s mouth … but I reckon we can give it to you for free if you prefer, you’ll just have to sit through a few more paragraphs of Gumshoe blather. Here’s some more from Vardy:

“If you’re ready to move fast, this silver mining stock can make your portfolio balloon to twice its size in the next two months. Just think of how your new year would look with a recently fattened wallet, stuffed with double your money!”

Oh, so there we go — so the text was written back in December and they’re just recirculating it, and we’re still expecting that double by February 14. I don’t want to spoil the surprise, but I can tell you that right now this pick is actually down about 15% since mid-December — so we’ll be generous and let Vardy get his double from now instead of from then, shall we? Never let it be said that we failed to be understanding about poorly timed investments, since we (OK, I mean “I”) make them with some regularity.

Here are the details about our silver miner, in Vardy’s words:

“You’ve heard of cheap Chinese labor, right? Well, this company does that one better. In the quarter ended June 30, 2010, this ‘China miracle’ company produced 1.4 million ounces of silver at a cash cost of negative $6.31 per ounce!

“Its ‘Overseas Chinese’ management just inked a joint venture to acquire 70% equity interest in the high-profit Yunxiang Mining Co. Ltd., a private company in China’s Hunan Province… a deal that will boost their bottom line skyward!

“January and February are traditionally strong markets for silver. But this stock will likely leave other silver stocks in the dust. It’s 5-year net profit margin has been 41.38%, compared to an industry average of just 1.09%.”

Vardy also uses many of the standard arguments for silver that we hear over and over again — he mentions that the silver-to-gold ratio is historically high (it’s about 47 right now), and implies that he thinks it will revert to the historical average of around 15/1. We hear that a lot, though do note that those low historic ratios that we often see (12/1, 15/1, etc. — meaning it takes 15 ounces of silver to buy an ounce of gold) are very historical, they include the centuries when silver and gold were essentially strapped together at almost monetary rates of exchange, and when one or the other backed most currencies (or were most currencies, since most currency was coinage).

Over the last 100+ years the silver/gold ratio has rarely dipped below 30, and for fairly brief periods of time, and has as often spiked to over 75, coming close to 100 a couple times. So be careful about your confidence that something will return to a long-term mean, if you’re talking about several thousand years of a 15/1 average ratio it could easily go to 200/1 before we’re all dead and still end up averaging 15/1 on these kinds of historic (almost prehistoric) charts. That’s not to say that silver is a bad investment, or that there aren’t other reasons why it might continue to outpace gold, as it has for the past decade and more recently, but to a non-expert like me that particular ratio of silver to gold prices doesn’t seem all that predictive in the short term (like, less than 50-100 years).

And yes, he also mentions the silver shortages that are often teased by investment newsletters — though it should be noted that although industrial demand is certainly a key driver of silver (and not gold), the main reason for these perceived “shortages” of coins is huge spikes in investor demand. You’ll see stories about the US mint running out of silver, for example, but that just means they’re not producing silver collectible coins to sell direct to collectors — they’re still buying up tons of silver and producing plenty of bullion coins that are sold through banks and dealers. (That’s a side-effect of the mint’s Congressional mandate: they’re required to produce bullion coins in sufficient quantity to meet demand, they are not required to produce collectible coins, so when investor demand spikes they have to turn over their production to bullion coins).

Demand for silver has certainly been rising, all you have to do is look at the price to see that, but since so much of it is investor demand it’s sometimes perceived to be less steadfast — swings in investor sentiment can be much faster than swings in the actual economy that might impact demand for silver for electronics, for example.

To be clear, I own silver personally and think it is a useful part of any portfolio, largely as a hedge to maintain purchasing power. I just like to throw out the other arguments since they’re not often a part of the teaser ads or newsletter soliloquizing.

But what you want is the name of this stock, right? Well, it will probably sound familiar to some of you — it’s been a favorite of a few newsletter guys for the past couple years, this is Silvercorp Metals (SVM).

And yes, Silvercorp is the biggest primary silver miner in China, though as with most silver mines there are significant secondary metals as well — in their case it’s mostly lead and zinc, which produce enough revenue for the mine that when they talk about their cost to produce silver it comes out negative after crediting for those “byproducts.” Vardy teases that they produced 1.4 million ounces at a cash cost of negative $6.31, and I can confirm that this basic performance level is continuing — in the quarter after that (the September quarter of last year, their second quarter) they report that they produced 1.34 million ounces at a cash surplus of $6.30 per ounce.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


So it’s hard to argue with the combination of significant byproduct revenue and generally low operating costs in China, though it’s not all that unusual for silver miners to also depend substantially on copper, zinc, lead or nickel prices to subsidize their operations (which is part of why silver production falls sometimes when base metal prices fall — if nickel miners have to shut in production because demand drops, for example, the byproduct silver that they generated disappears from the market). But yes, Silvercorp is a special case in terms of the cash cost per ounce.

They’re also trying to expand and diversify away from their primary mining area, they are currently producing from four mines at the Ying Mining Camp in Henan Province, where they also continue to drill for more reserves, but are trying to develop mines in Hunan and Guangdong as well, and they’re also trying to diversify outside China and develop a mine in northern British Columbia.

The company is technically Canadian, though the Chinese operations are held in Chinese subsidiaries that they control (generally about 70% owned by SVM) but that are partnered with Chinese companies or quasi-governmental entities, so they do report reserves and resources and production data that will look familiar if you’re used to analyzing Vancouver mining companies — you can see their reserves numbers here if you like.

As a business, SVM generates numbers that look substantially better than some similarly sized non-Chinese peers like Coeur d’Alene (CDE) or Hecla Mining (HL), with particularly much better margins thanks to their low cost operations — but it’s also priced at a premium for the same reason. I wouldn’t argue against SVM and it has certainly been a spectacular performer, though I have no reason to think it will be over $20 in a month as Vardy teases.

And as I noted, several other newsletters have pitched SVM in the past, notably Matt Badiali about a year and a half ago (the stock has tripled since then) and, in an extremely aggressive and long-lived push, as the “silver under the great wall” stock teased by Sound Profits that began almost exactly a year ago (up about 60% since then). It’s an easy stock to pitch during a precious metals bull market, with the China connection and their low cash costs, so I’m sure there have been many others on board this train as well.

I don’t currently own these shares (or any other stock mentioned above, though as I noted I do own silver bullion), but I know many of the readers in the great Gumshoe Universe have been Silvercorp buyers in the past — are you still holding on? Expect a double from here? Or are the days of phenomenal growth behind them? Let us know what you think with a comment below.

We do not have any subscriber reviews for Vardy’s Global Bull Market Alert yet, so if you’ve ever subscribed I’m sure your fellow investors would like to hear your thoughts — just click here to review it for us today.

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Evan
Guest
Evan
January 19, 2011 2:47 pm

I'm a big believer in this company, it's doubled since I've owned it and I have no intention of selling, since if they can keep negative cash costs while increasing production they should continue to outperform.

eanmdphd
Irregular
eanmdphd
January 19, 2011 2:57 pm

"Since I've owned it" is not a useful parameter….a date would be useful. Thanks.

Dlst
Dlst
January 19, 2011 3:19 pm

>>If you’re ready to move fast, this silver mining stock can make your portfolio balloon to twice its size in the next two months.<<

Well, if you sold everything else and then invested 100% of your portfolio in the one stock, perhaps, but no one in their right mind is going to do that. If that's the sort of advice they dispense for $995/yr, I can state categorically that I WILL NEVER SUBSCRIBE TO THEIR NEWSLETTER. To be honest, I wouldn't anyway, but this clinches it.

Add a Topic
443
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
hedy1234
hedy1234
January 19, 2011 3:28 pm

I owned it for about a year. It had a great run and I sold it this recent PM downturn along with some others that had done very well for me.

terencio
Guest
terencio
January 19, 2011 3:33 pm

I bought SVM 10/12/2009 for $7 and have seen it double and slip back to where it is now $10+

RC22
Guest
RC22
January 19, 2011 4:35 pm

I lucked in to SVM back in Dec 08 for under $2. Needless to say, it's one of my current favorites. I'm starting to think about getting out of it though, as I am questioning how much more it will run.

Add a Topic
5916
Myron Martin
Guest
Myron Martin
January 19, 2011 4:41 pm

If every stock I have owned for the past 3 years did as well as Silvercorp I would already be a millionaire. Or perhaps I should say, if I had split my inheritance between Silvercorp and Jinshan its Chinese gold cousin, and just sat on them, I would be set for life.

As usual Travis presents a reasonably balanced picture. I say that because there are "traditionalists" out there who are constantly bad mouthing gold and silver because they do not pay dividends or pay interest, but then what fixed income investments today pays an interest rate that exceeds the erosion of inflation if we compared REAL RATES instead of the distorted government statistics?

Interest bearing investments merely provide an "illusion" of wealth and until people learn to start thinking in terms of preserving actual "purchasing power" (which gold and silver have done for 5000 years) no fair comparisons will be possible.

There are always those who are quick to remind us that gold and silver can go down as well as up, which is certainly true, but i submit that is primarily because we have a highly MANIPULATED market rather than a free one. Currently fiat currencies are at WAR with precious metals because the establishment Central Banking system realizes that increases in precious metals prices are an indictment of the fiat currency system that is so highly profitable for them, and exposes peoples increasing loss of faith in fiat currencies.

It would be just as legitimate to suggest that blue chips are not SAFE investments because of companies like Enron, AIG, GM , Chrysler, Lehman, ad infinitum as to suggest that gold and silver are RISKY, as seems to be the mantra of the establishment touting fixed investments in which bankers and brokers have a vested interest in promoting.

The unbiased observer need only consider TWO stock charts to determine which makes the most sense as an investment for the near term future, until there is a CLEAR change of trend. 1) Check the DECLINE of purchasing power of the U.S. dollar since 2000, (close to 40%) as a proxy for ALL fiat currencies that historically have never lasted much over 100 years before returning to their intrinsic value of ZERO. I predict the U.S. dollar will pretty well get there by the hundredth year anniversary of the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913.

2) The INCREASE in price (at least as it is perceived) of gold and silver since 2000 in contrast to the dollars decline is a 300% to 400% range on average. Now which would you rather experience for a decade, a 40% LOSS in purchasing power, OR, a 3-400% INCREASE in purchasing power?

While more difficult to calculate, using SILVER as the constant instead of any fiat currency in determining the cost of what you buy.would soon clue you in that it is not the price of gold and silver that has been rising, it is the fiat currencies that have been LOSING their purchasing power. Until people get that clear in their mind they will continue to get ripped off by the establishment thinking that pervades brokers, financial planners, politicians and bankers.

Due to establishment propaganda the slightest twitch in gold and silver prices will panic the unsophisticated investor into a chicken little; "the sky is falling" mode, (as is the bullion banks manipulation of the market intent) when in fact there has not been any serious breach of the upward channel since the panic of 08, and yes I admit that it COULD and WOULD happen again IF the bullion banks had enough physical supply to sell into the market to force the price down.

Given pending short selling restrictions the chances of that happening are greatly diminished so i feel quite safe holding a world recognized store of value with a 5000 year history as opposed to holding somebodies paper I>O>U> with counter party risk that could tumble like a room full of well positioned dominoes!

As one famous investor opined when asked when he would sell his gold, his reply was a classic; when they STOP printing paper dollars! If wealth was a simple matter of PRINTING MONEY then why don't they just send every citizen a cheque for a million so we can all live happily ever after without having to work? I know helicopter Ben is trying, but so far it hasn't (and can't) work! OOPS, if we all had a million in the bank to spend at our leisure, then who would want to go to work and produce the goods we want to purchase or consume?

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
210
Add a Topic
210
Tom Freund
Guest
Tom Freund
January 19, 2011 6:01 pm

I'm with you, Myron.

GlobalMkt

Adrian
Guest
Adrian
January 19, 2011 6:40 pm

Excellent post Myron. Talking of inflation I noted this week that here in the UK our annual inflation rate of 3.7% is now higher than that of Zimbabwe, which went down to 3.2%. However, on this news the Pound actually went up! Go figure. Glad I've got my gold and silver.

Back on topic, I had a fantastic ride out of Silvercorp from 2004 (when it was called SKN resources) riding it all the way from under 50c to $20 (before they did a 3:1 split). I held some of the position through thick and thin but finally dumped the remainder in 2009 at around $4. I felt that from 2008 the company was being run more for the benefit of the management than the shareholders so haven't touched it or its sister company New Pacific (NUX) since.

Add a Topic
717
Add a Topic
717
Add a Topic
210
Iikka K
Guest
Iikka K
January 19, 2011 7:01 pm

Myron: That's odd, I never noticed the price of all goods nearly doubling over the last year. It must be that I'm eating fiat food, wearing fiat clothes, living in a fiat apartment heated by fiat natural gas and powered by fiat electricity.

Frankly, in real terms of purchasing power the dollar may have lost a couple of percent while silver has gained 70%. This makes silver a great speculative investment (if you got in a year or two ago), but it's in no way behaving like an inflation hedge. Even according to your own numbers silver price has gone up an order of magnitude faster than the value of the dollar has gone down.

Add a Topic
338
Add a Topic
443
Add a Topic
443
eanmdphd
Irregular
eanmdphd
January 19, 2011 7:30 pm

The products that came to mind for me were
health insurance
college education
funeral costs

Now these have one interesting thing in common….

Add a Topic
882
eanmdphd
Irregular
eanmdphd
January 19, 2011 7:29 pm

Reference inflation: More than a decade ago, when inflation was rather low, I thought otherwise. I thought there was a unique set of products that had very high inflation, especially relative to the 2-3% inflation people were citing. Think about it… what were those products?

Next comment

Add a Topic
717
Add a Topic
717
Add a Topic
717
eanmdphd
Irregular
eanmdphd
January 19, 2011 7:36 pm

What did the inflationary products have in common?
FOR the most part, people purchased just one of them:
one health insurance
one college education (though it could be continuous, as in my own case for quite a few years — tho scholarships helped)
one funeral.

Most other products, people buy more than one of them:
cars — more than one per family is frequent (consider all the rental cars out there… someone is buying them)
houses — sometimes more than one per family (and consider the investment properties)

certainly we all have more shoes, phones, TV's than we had in the past.

There is a point to this some economist ought to write about as I am merely making an observation. When I kept hearing that inflation was low, I kept wondering what are they talking about reference health care, funerals, college …. and that is the inference I came up with. Inflation was low for what you purchased plenty of, but high for what was a one purchase item.

Just a thought to share with you all. It would be interesting to make the ounce of gold / price of good hand made suit comparison with these other products.

Add a Topic
882
Add a Topic
717
Add a Topic
717
shredder
Guest
shredder
January 19, 2011 8:10 pm

SVW does pay a dividend….very unusual for jr resource stocks.
I've owned it inn the past, might be time to look at buying it again
SVM is also optionable….sweet

Add a Topic
372
cynic
Member
cynic
January 19, 2011 8:55 pm

SVM is one of my most important core holdings .It comes recommended by many precious metal stock newsletters,and for good reason. One of my newsletter experts says SVM will become the next Silver Wheaton. As a core holding I look to buy more at significant dips, like the one thats ongoing at 10 dollars a share,looking for it to fall to 9 and I'll add another tranche.
The problem with these newsletter promo pitches,as always, the hard sell hits the public forum usually at a time when the stock is in danger of falling, I think they time it that way so the pump will prop up the chart wave pattern. Always look at the stock chart before buying. You will see the timing is often not good for buying.
The time to buy SVM was last year at the 6 dollar zone. Its doubtful SVM will see 6 again. now 9 dollars looks like a discount.,my next target.. When these newsletters pump a stock its often a year or longer the horse left the barn.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
443
Add a Topic
5971
Malcolm
Guest
Malcolm
January 19, 2011 10:49 pm

Wynn –
"Confiscation" is the right winger word to describe Obama's effort, in a business-friendly way, to arrange medical expense care insurance for almost all of the 40 to 50 million Americans without health insurance. Of all advanced nations, we have by far the greatest percentage of folks depending on nothing by prayer to keep them from medical expense forced bankruptcy. Whatever you think of prayer, this is not the best of financial planning. Meanwhile, those with plenty of money beat their chests, claiming that the US has the best medical care system, and screaming for Obama to keep his hands off their privileged health care situations. Well, look at the child mortality and life expectancy data comparing the US against other Western countries. We trail most countries, while devoting by far the greatest share of GDP to medical expenses. Our system is very good for people with plenty of money, those who shout about "confiscation" when what they mean is the hell with those who can't get or can't afford health insurance. You might want to look in the mirror, and try to find some sign of something other than selfishness.

Add a Topic
882
Add a Topic
882
Add a Topic
882
eanmdphd
Irregular
eanmdphd
January 19, 2011 11:02 pm

What did the inflationary products have in common?

They were all products that are purchased just once (or one at time) in a life time. One education, one health care, one funeral.

Richard Stone
Guest
Richard Stone
January 19, 2011 11:07 pm

I like gold , I like silver … they are both pretty and I can sit and hold them while watching our North American governments slip into the financial abyss on the news !

Add a Topic
210
Add a Topic
443
blackjack
blackjack
January 19, 2011 11:38 pm

have a look at other mines around the world as well
if theyre mining silver then they should go up as well

Add a Topic
443
Peaceful Warrior
Guest
Peaceful Warrior
January 20, 2011 12:10 am

SLX (Silvermex) is bound to have it's run soon. After merging with Genco Resources later last year, it currently has the best board of any silver junior with both production and exploration experience.

Completed a financing back in December 2010 and will be using the $$$ to put their La Guitarra mine in full production and generate cash flow. It is already producing 200 tones/day, with a very low cost given the proven reserves available since the Aztech times.

Here's a valuation: http://tinyurl.com/6lfpvhd

Add a Topic
443

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x