Become a Member

Navellier and Mechel — Cautionary Tale

Greetings from the road, everyone — my time is limited today so I’m sharing a very interesting comment that a reader sent in … we’ll call him Carlo.

Carlo looked into Louis Navellier’s recent history with the formerly highflying Russian steel (and coal) stock, Mechel (MTL). This was also a Robert Hsu pick for a while, I’m told (Hsu and Navellier have the same publisher), but the same little birdie also told me that Hsu sold his Mechel at a very lucky time. Navellier apparently didn’t (I have no way of knowing for sure), though I imagine he has probably sold it by now.

I’m sharing this note just to offer yet another little cautionary tale — Navellier’s system is built on earnings momentum and growth, among other similar quantitative measures, and like any other system it can fall prey to big downside surprises. MTL’s was essentially political in nature, which means it probably shouldn’t have been that much of a surprise in Russia, but one can never quite predict where bad news will come from … and stocks like this that build a following among growth and momentum investors can fall much harder than most when those surprises do occur.

I’ve never lookd at Mechel in any detail and don’t know whether the severely beaten down price now is an opportunity, but if you have an opinion feel free to share.

Here, without further ado, is Carlo’s compilation of Navellier’s notes about Mechel over the last couple months — if you’ve got a chance, go back and read over them … would you have been convinced that this was a great stock to buy?

MTL today (07/29) is still going down … $18 and counting.

Again, I don’t really mean to single out Louis Navellier, though he’s one of the more aggressive advertisers and I write about him quite a bit — just wanted to share Carlo’s walk down memory lane, and offer a little sober reminder that very few systems are really effective at predicting the bad news shocks that occasionally hit the companies we know and love.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

52 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
steve
steve
July 29, 2008 3:57 pm

Louie, E mailed me special instructions yesterday
to put in a ‘GTC’ order to sell (MTL) at $22.00
he predicts a dead cat bounce. I bet he sold already. we’ll see if it bounces back up to 22

spreadtrader
spreadtrader
July 29, 2008 7:01 pm

From his blog: “Yesterday, shares of Mechel (MTL) plunged 38%….The good news is that the stock is bouncing back today by over 13%, and the company has released an official statement saying that it will cooperate with the government. I’ll keep new posted on any further developments in Mechel.
Posted by Louis Navellier on July 25, 2008 1:32 PM”

What he doesn’t say is that the day before “yesterday” (the 23rd) the stock closed at 36.61…already 38% off its high. At 18, the stock was 69% off its high. After plummeting 40 bucks without so much as a “look out below” from him, the 13% rally he’s talking about was all of $3.36. How can this guy stay in business?

Add a Topic
2556
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
2556
Bigdummyjoe
Guest
Bigdummyjoe
July 29, 2008 7:46 pm

He stays in business because he’s actually very good and what he does and most people are very bad at investing. Actually most people who buy stocks aren’t investing. They are gambling. But they either don’t know it or they are deluded into thinking that they are investing. That’s how he does it.

Add a Topic
2578
spreadtrader
spreadtrader
July 29, 2008 10:10 pm

Just so that I understand….this guy was closely following this recommended stock on at least a weekly basis, during which time (less than 60 days)it lost 69% of its value. At no time did this very good investor counsel his very bad gambling subscribers (who don’t really understand investing) to sell it; and that makes him very good at what he does? ANYBODY can pick stocks. What separates the “good investors” from the wannabes is the ability to cut losses and lock in profits. It appears that this gentleman can do neither. He’s a wannabe. Even an ordinary chart reader could tell that this stock needed to be sold no later than June 24th. It’s not what you make, it’s what you keep. By the way, what does he charge for the privilege of watching 69% percent of your money (not his) disappear?

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
2578
Add a Topic
5971
DonBull
DonBull
July 30, 2008 9:52 am

Back in 1995, I went to a presentation by Louie (in Sarasota), have followed what he throws out for free (never subscribed), he’s not a good picker! Believe he is in the same unspectacular stable (Philips) with Tobin Smith, etc.
which grinds out yards long email enticements (they apparently pay copywriters by the yard).

Add a Topic
502
Add a Topic
372
Jim
Guest
July 30, 2008 9:54 am

Hey Folks does anybody know what the stock simble
is for the stock that Warren Buffet bought $500 million worth?? I would love to know just to see if its true. Thanks
Jim

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
fireball
Guest
July 30, 2008 10:07 am

from what i can tell by following l.n. some, his advice may be pretty good on some quick trades. i believe he has sacrificed some integrity during these rougher tighter times. as investments from my limited perspective he has not done well. hey if anyone wants to send a few thousand i will tell you my next guess but i would advise you to just follow the gumshoe as he helps me make my guesses quite a bit.

Elissa Stein
Guest
Elissa Stein
July 30, 2008 10:27 am

Yes, Louie has his share of rocks that plummet. So does Steven Leeb. You should see what he did after he recommended AYR and it started to plummet. He endorsed it again! Then, a day or two later, he issued an urgent message to sell. It’s lost over 50% from where he recommended it. You just can’t rely on these guys to warn. They don’t seem to have the expertise they tout.

Indya
Guest
Indya
July 30, 2008 10:28 am

Anyone who invests in Russia has done absolutely no research or ahs lost all perspective. Sorry for the losers but it’s inevitable that the govt, i.e., Putin & Co, will own everything that isn’t alrewady theirs. What does the Gumshoe always say about one-owner stocks? It applies in spades in Russia.

Add a Topic
424
Add a Topic
424
Gerry
Member
Gerry
July 30, 2008 10:48 am

On another front and Paraphasing DonBull “…they apparently pay copywriters by the yard.”
Has anybody read Crooks Jr’s pub yesterday about “for Big Game Hunters, in Forex”? – Very enticing. I would like to ear comments.

Add a Topic
372
Keith
Member
Keith
July 30, 2008 10:48 am

If you stick with Louie’s conservative picks he actually has done pretty well through the years. I’m not sure why anybody in their right mind would invest a dime in “Putin’s” Russia.

Add a Topic
424
Dan
Guest
Dan
July 30, 2008 10:54 am

I used to gamble on football. I used my own reasoning for the first couple of years and did terrible. Then I responded to emails from supposed experts in the gambling field, paid a few of them for their services, with similar results. Finally, my wife made me quit. Now I fill this need to gamble by buying and selling stocks, following the same pattern–trying to pick on my own, then following touts like Crammer and Navelier.

Stocks, football…same thing. Neither is an investment. They’re both just gambling.

Add a Topic
2578
Add a Topic
2578
SageNot
Member
SageNot
July 30, 2008 10:54 am

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=MTL

Bigdummyjoe ISN’T!!! You bet that you’re gambling when you say that buying stocks is just investing. Warren Buffett invests (in the businesses), most of us are gambling to some extent. Good gamblers set loss limits so that they have skin left to play with, hence a trailing stop loss s/b used with stocks to lessen the hit when the stuff hits the fan.

Forgive me for re-posting one of Mark Skousen’s rules; “never, never let a big gain become a loss” or words to that effect. It’s just dumb to say that you’re investing (gambling) for a bigger gain, when all you have to do is buy back in if you were wrong to sell. What’s a “round-trip” commission compared to the $$ carnage that “buy & hold” subjects you to w/o a reasonable stop?

I’m with you Bigdummyjoe!

SageNot

Add a Topic
2578
Add a Topic
995
Add a Topic
2578
TC
Guest
TC
July 30, 2008 12:38 pm

To add my 2 cents, and to be perfectly open and honest, I did jump on the Navellier’s hype train a little over a month ago and bought into GTE – he was touting that this one would ‘double by next Friday or your money back!’ Well, when he moved the ‘next Friday’ bit up a week (I think it was at least twice) it still didn’t help. It’s all been downhill.

Sure everyone says wonderful things about GTE and how the company is going strong, but for a ‘two-bagger’ that Navellier said it would be, WRONG! I’m currently 33% DOWN! In the long run Navellier may be right about the potential….but for a quick gain as blatantly predicted, this is a real bummer.

Nick
Guest
Nick
July 30, 2008 5:02 pm

Louie’s latest “$13 solar doubler” seems to be Solarfun (SOLF) — last round of earnings produced a damn good bounce, but with the way the market is right now I’m not sure if it will repeat. Anyone fancy some SOLF?

Tom
Tom
July 30, 2008 5:54 pm

I bought FSYS, GTE & GSI as per Navellier recommendation(not subrscribed to it yet; thought I’ll go by his free recos to see how he is before subscribing). All stocks are down till now. Still awaiting to reach my buy price. Got the lastest reco about some “$13 solar doubler”. Maybe its SOLF. Not sure.

JohnnnyB
JohnnnyB
July 30, 2008 6:31 pm

Todays discussion has one aspect not asked by anyone. Who are these investment letter writers really working for? Your financial health and well being or theirs and the company they are touting?

The comments about gambling are very true. I think about that aspect of investing each time I make a trade and challenge myself (are you gambling today JohnnyB or are you making a reasonable investment choice?) That is a tough call. I wonder how many of us are in it for the excitement and adrenalin rush it brings to be on the right side of the trade. The feeling of blowing your horn on the message sight for the stock. Not something I do, but for some.

As for me I really yearn for someone who can give me good advide that I can follow because I just need to be in charge of my own financial situation and missed econ 101 otherwise I guess a good mutual fund would be more practicle. I might even sleep better at night.

I also agree with the comments that it takes a lot of courage for a newsletter writer to say “Hey I’m wrong on this trade, get out now”. Now there are a couple like that at Stansberry I like. Two times I have had trades recommended to me were in situations where the company touted maintained that they had huge cash reserves, when they didn’t. That always hurts an advisor, bam your blindsided by the company you depended on to tell you the truth. Unfortunately we have witnessed more and more of this sort of sickness on Wall Street as the financial market continues to fall. First they started misrepresenting the quality of the investment they were selling and then they lied later on about their balance sheet. Gambling may be the operative word in this day and age of investing, when you are not sure who you really can trust.

Speaking of trust thank goodness for “Gumshoe Guy”, a breath of fresh air in troubling times. WOW!

Add a Topic
2578
Add a Topic
2578
Add a Topic
5971
Read&Invest
July 30, 2008 10:35 pm

I tried Crooks and used my money=back guarantee. I was not impressed. Navallier has a good long term track record, but it’s based upon the market going up more than down. You will lose money with him and almost anyone in a bear market. Lately I’ve made $ selling deep out-of-the money put options on big down days where the expiration is less than a month away. You’d be surprised how much people will pay you when they are scared and greedy. I own a small amount of SOLF. I haven’t made money on it yet, but one nice earnings pop and I’ll be in the green. Mechel is probably a good speculative stock now, but if Putin is intent on killing it, you could lose it all. I think the new government doesn’t want the market killed by Putin. It’s a political power struggle issue now, not an investing issue. The company is in an investment sweet spot except for Putin. Navallier is big on agriculture and oil. For the short term at least, that’s the best part of the market. financials still seem risky to me.

Add a Topic
570
Add a Topic
372
Add a Topic
2556
Bart
Member
Bart
July 31, 2008 9:48 am

I’m with you guys. It appears to me that Navallier’s stocks are generally high priced with little room to move, so the average investor probably can’t do it. Only if you can play the average on the portfolio as a whole and be in when he is does it appear you have a shot at it working. It’s more like educated gaming.

On Russia, there is no power struggle. Putin controls the government. He merely moved to a different position because time was up on how long he could be president. His boy was put in that job so he still effectively controls it.

Add a Topic
424
A.Nony Mouse
Guest
A.Nony Mouse
July 31, 2008 10:43 am

In Hsu’s latest update, he states that subscribers who followed his buy/sell advice on Mechel would have booked a 249% profit. Admits he was lucky with his sell call timing. A word of advice to perspective Hsu subscribers…wait for the $199 13 week sale on his AsiaPacific Edge Newsletter. The gains are much better than China Stratgy. Plus If you have a little bit on the ball you can learn how he thinks and can become you own Robert Hsu with the help of Investor’s Business Daily weekly top 100 stocks

Add a Topic
2556
Add a Topic
108
Add a Topic
2337

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x