What’s Chris Wood touting as “The #1 Ten-Bagger Biotech Play for 2020?”

What's being teased in the ads for Mauldin's new Healthy Returns newsletter? Editor Chris Wood says, "It’s not a penny stock or risky startup. FDA approval of its blockbuster new drug is just a few short months away—and this one investment alone could hand you a small fortune in 2020."


This article was originally published back in August, 2019 when we were getting lots of questions about Chris Wood’s teaser pitch — the ad is still largely the same, most of the hints and projections are identical and he still expects that February 2020 approval will send the stock soaring (yes, we’re still getting this ad in our inboxes this week, in May, promising that February 2020 jump).

So most of what follows is from our original article and the original teaser ad last summer, published on August 20, 2019, but I have thrown in some updates since the story has changed quite a bit.

*****

We haven’t looked at a biotech teaser pitch in a little while, so this one for a new Mauldin Economics newsletter caught my eye… Chris Wood is helming Healthy Returns, along with celebrity doctor Michael Roizen (now referred to as a “wellness guru” and head of the Wellness Institute at the Cleveland Clinic, he is also a doctor and has partnered on a bunch of projects with Dr. Oz).

Apparently they’re going to be picking “the very best health and wellness stocks” for subscribers, and also, as is fairly common in the investment newsletter industry, offering up health and wellness tips (publishers have noticed that their average newsletter subscribers are both in their wealthiest and most investing-focused years, their 50s and 60s, and in their highest-healthcare-interest years).

I don’t know how the letter will do, of course, and it’s brand new and we haven’t heard anything from subscribers yet… it’s priced as an entry level “wealth and wellness” letter ($49/year), and we’ll probably see more pitches from them if this one works, but you don’t have to rush into anything. We’ll check out the clues for you, identify the “10 times richer” stock they’re pitching this time around, and give you the chance to think for yourself a bit. Then, if you want to subscribe, you can do so without dreams of buying Jeffrey Epstein’s private island (bring your own Clorox wipes) getting in the way of your rational thought.

Here are the bullet points they start us with at the top of the ad:

  • “Doctors and millions of patients already demand it
  • Insurance companies have agreed to pay for it
  • FDA approval is just months away
  • It may be bigger than blockbuster Lipitor—the world’s #1 best-selling drug
  • And early investors can DOUBLE their investment in as little as six months… and ten times or more in 2022 and beyond!”

OK, so what are we looking at? As the Lipitor reference indicates, this is a cholesterol drug of some sort. Here’s a bit more:

“In the US alone, more than 102 million people have high cholesterol. Perhaps you’re one of them.

“Living with high LDL cholesterol puts you at a significant risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) because cholesterol, especially the bad LDL cholesterol that builds up in your arteries, can lead to a heart attack, stroke, and death.”

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


And we’ve all heard about the problems and side effects of statins, at least for some people… so this is a pitch about a non-Statin solution:

“One biotech company is tackling this statin problem head-on with a revolutionary NON-STATIN drug discovery that could end high LDL cholesterol woes forever… and make early investors incredibly wealthy!

“FDA approval, in my estimation, is just months away… and so are skyrocketing profits.”

More hinting on that point:

“… one company has stepped into the gap to bring desperately needed cholesterol relief to millions of people.

“They may have discovered the holy grail to fighting cholesterol without statins—with not one, but two cholesterol-lowering, non-statin drugs.

“The CEO of the company said earlier this year at a global healthcare conference that these two pioneering, non-statin drugs are ‘poised to change the treatment paradigm for LDL-cholesterol -lowering. This is the first time in history there’s a non-statin oral drug that lowers LDL-cholesterol by 50% like a statin.'”

And these drugs, apparently, have already been through Phase III trials — with both drugs lowering LDL cholesterol dramatically, anywhere from 35-50%. And they’ve already been submitted to the FDA for approval:

“… the company confidently submitted New Drug Applications (NDAs) for these two non-statins to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February.

“When the FDA received the applications, it made the rare announcement it would not call the customary advisory panel to review the newly accepted NDAs—a strong indication the FDA is not concerned about the drugs’ safety. Without calling a panel, these drugs may receive faster FDA approval.

“This news sent the company’s share price shooting up 15% in a single day.”

The promise is huge about this “ten-bagger” in the ad… here’s just a little taste:

“This one opportunity could be the bedrock for your secure financial future and a wealthy retirement. A rare ten-bagger that could take a $100,000 nest egg to $1 million in a very short period of time.

“Imagine how much richer, better, joyful your life would be if you could increase your wealth by 10 TIMES!”

Gets you right in the gut, right where your worries lie… and it is, of course, a nonsensical promise. Even getting fortunate with an investment pick that goes up 1,000% doesn’t make you “10 times richer” — it’s not like you’re betting your entire net worth on a single stock pick, right?

Yes, hitting the bullseye and turning an investment of $5,000 into $50,000 over a few years would make a difference in helping you beat a S&P 500 Index Fund… but if it makes a massive and life-changing difference, then that also means putting that $5,000 at risk in one position was an awfully big risk for you. Whatever the stock, please don’t put your whole “nest egg” in any one stock, regardless of what that stock is.

But anyway, you want answers — right? The Thinkolator tells us that this pitch is (still) for Esperion Therapeutics (ESPR), a stock that has been similarly promoted a few times in recent years (Ray Blanco called it the “golden pill”, though it hasn’t moved much since then, and two years ago Stansberry’s Dave Lashmet called it the “most valuable pill in development”).

And yes, Esperion was expecting approval from the FDA for its two pills, both based on bempedoic acid, early this year — the FDA PDUFA dates (which are a “decision should come by this date” guideline, though not guaranteed) are February 21 for bempedoic acid, and February 26 for the combination of bempedoic acid with ezetimibe. There are also some other data releases likely as we end 2019, including a phase 2 study for people with high LDL-C and type 2 diabetes, and there’s a larger outcomes study that will provide meaningful data at some point in the next couple years, but it’s those February approval dates that investors are mostly looking at.

And, what do you know, the drug was approved, both by the FDA in February and by the equivalent agency in Europe in April.

The timing teased is “could soar 1,000% in a few short years,” and the ad is signed by Chris Wood… but there’s also a quote from Dr. Roizen:

“Phase III drug trials were very positive. Patients did NOT see the side effect statin users complain of. And doctors will want to use this non-statin in combination with statins to get the LDL levels below 70. As with any new drug, the first 6 months of use in the general population will be critical in discovering any unexpected side effects once it gets into general use.”

Side effects and possible cardiovascular risk have been the concern with Esperion in the past that have delayed the approval process, as I recall, probably partly because the FDA is quite aware that a new anti-cholesterol drug is likely to be prescribed to millions of otherwise fairly healthy people, so it’s important to not screw up (this isn’t like a cure for an untreatable cancer, most people are on statins as a preventive and doing OK with that, despite the side effects, so the risk of making things worse is an important consideration).

Longtime readers might recall that this was also a favored stock of Dr. KSS starting back in 2014 (he who wrote biotech columns for us for a couple years), and it saw highs of over $110 and lows of around $10 in not much more than a year back in 2015 and 2016 as hopes for approval rose and fell. The story has come quite a long way since then, with some large Phase III studies started a few years ago that finally provided more evidence of the safety of ESPR’s drugs and their ability to reduce cholesterol (if maybe not some of the more dramatic hoped-for outcomes beyond that), and it’s on the strength of those studies that they applied for marketing approval a year ago and received that approval earlier this year.

As I wrote last August, the odds of FDA rejection seemed pretty low, partly because they’ve already responded to some FDA concerns for a few years, and partly because bempedoic acid has been somwhat “validated” by the deals they’ve made this year (for European rights with Daiichi Sankyo, and for a partial royalty-like financing deal with Oberland Capital that included a $125 million upfront payment last year). That was not a contrarian opinion, though, from what I can tell most people assumed it would get approved… and betting on something that a lot of people agree on does not necessarily produce outsize returns. Which is why the stock didn’t move so much on that approval — what moves a stock is surprise, and nobody was surprised that those drugs were approved on February 21 and February 26… here’s the chart of Esperion so far this year, the shares hit their high for the year (so far) as investors were betting on that FDA approval, and then dropped pretty sharply once the approvals came in — the stock was around $68 on February 20 and $60 on the 25th, and is right at about $44 as I update this:

ESPR Chart

Apparently Esperion is looking to go it alone with production and commercialization of bempedoic acid instead of partnering it with some larger player in the US, or at least that’s the impression I get from their latest update (the May 6 release of first quarter results). So both of Esperion’s drugs are now approved and are commercially available (well, Nexletol is available — Nexlizet will be avaialable starting in about three weeks), but I don’t know how to guess at the size of the market for Esperion in any analytical way. You can see their updated Investor Presentation here if you’d like to see what their plans are — there has been some impact from COVID-19, mostly in delaying some of their revenue projections and reducing their costs a bit as their salesforce has to go “digital” and as a lot of non-urgent doctor interactions are paused.

Here’s what I wrote last August:

“I have no particular skill in predicting clinical outcomes or FDA decisions, and I tend not to invest in clinical-stage biotechs because I can rarely come up with any revenue or earnings numbers with any degree of certainty, but I would guess that the chances of bempedoic acid being rejected by the FDA are pretty small… and that this will pretty quickly become a stock that reacts not just to “yes or no” decisions by the FDA but to the potential scope — if the dreams of backers come true and this ends up being a drug that is as widely prescribed as statins, with 100+ million patients, then the stock is almost certainly an incredible bargain… if the FDA or most insurance companies tap the brakes and keep it, for whatever reason, in a slower lane by restricting use to a smaller cohort of patients, then no one will be buying a private island this time around.

“That’s how I’d think of this stock — after reading about it for so many years I’d tend to have some optimism, but I know myself and my lack of biotech expertise well enough to understand that my optimism doesn’t mean anything (when investing, don’t pick the sector where you’d be the least informed investor in the room). Analysts are penciling in revenue numbers in 2020 and 2021 (up to $200 million in 2021), but those numbers are tiny compared to the sales of branded statins at their peak so clearly the basic assumption is that the drug will be approved but that it won’t immediately take a huge part of the cholesterol-lowering market… whether that’s because drugs take a while to ramp up, or because mass adoption will (hopefully) come later as further studies are conducted, I don’t know.”

Those forecasts have been updated a bit now, with analysts now penciling in 2020 revenue at $243 million (juiced by the milestone payments from their partners) and 2021 at $226 million, rising sharply to $414 million in 2022 when analysts think they’ll reach profitability (the range of forecasts is very high, so don’t take that to the bank — these are still educated guesses about a drug that has just begun to get insurance approvals and doctor attention). 2022 is also when they expect the results of their long-term CVOT survival clinical trials, which they’re hoping will allow them to upgrade their marketing of the drugs in 2023 to include much more dramatic health (and safety) outcomes, perhaps leading to a wider potential customer base.

So I’ll leave you there, dear friends — don’t expect a big bump from FDA approval on this one (the approval has come and gone, with no real bump), and allow for the possibility that the takeup by doctors could be slow, and dramatic billion-dollar blockbuster sales figures for these bempezoic acid drugs, if they come at all, will probably be several years into the future. But ESPR has enough cash to get through to profitability, they think, and if bempezoic acid really turns out to be as big a deal as statins, well, maybe there will be dramatic longer-term gains for patient investors.

I’m sure many of you are better biotech investors than I, and probably quite a few of you have been following the ESPR story over the years… if you’ve got thoughts to share on the subject, I hope you’ll do so with a comment below. I’ve left the original comments from this article attached below as well, so you can see what fellow investors have been thinking about ESPR over the past year. Enjoy!


Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)

49
Share your thoughts...

avatar
27 Comment threads
22 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
36 Comment authors
LeRoyCarla C. CarterRaydoylegardnerScott Briskey Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

hedy1234
Member
👍1616
hedy1234

Travis, which calls do you like to cover this? What about a spread?

George
Guest
George

The concept that any pre-commercial biotech will cure your retirement woes is ridiculous. That said, as a professional in this area, I have been accumulating ESPR with plans to shed 2/3 of it in the run-up to the Feb dates, basically cash out on the volatility of the options before the news hits. I believe it will have a harder time to enter the market than analysts predict (slower ramp up), but still a very solid play.

Steve
Guest
Steve

I can confirm it is ESPR.

Michael Jorrin,
Author
👍382

Esperion has worked hard to get bempedoic acid & the ezetimibe-bempedoic combo to the point where the FDA green light is likely. But then it will take its place in the running with the statins & other anticholesterol agents, which are cheaper & work fine for most folks. The statins have withstood many assaults. Counting on a drug to replace them is a very long shot.

SageNot
Guest
SageNot

That’s very brave of you Travis, these kinds of options are usually crap shots & you hit the nail on the head here!

Martin
Irregular
👍142

As with all my calls I only speculate with what I’m willing to loose 100%

BOB HAHN
Guest
BOB HAHN

THANK YOU TRAVIS!… SO MANY SCAMS OUT THERE!

Richard VEDDER
Guest
Richard VEDDER

More people die with low cholesterol than with high. These drugs are more about making money than concern with peoples’ health.

BJI
Guest
BJI

Can you furnish links to: “More people die with low cholesterol than with high.”

kitkatz
Member
👍5
kitkatz

not to be flippant but everyone dies eventually and most do not have high cholesterol I would think?

samwiebaux
Guest
samwiebaux

The news of my impending death is clearly accurate!

esgerard
Member
👍9

Doctors who prescribe statins will tell you it is to “balance” your high and low cholesterol. It need not be high cholesterol to have a statin prescribed.

Ray
Guest
Ray

It is easy to do a search which reveals that among “senior citizens”; the higher the overall cholesterol level is = a higher age of death. This is “all-cause” mortality. In other words no matter what one dies of, it happens at a later age if the overall cholesterol level is higher. Not surprising when you realize that our hormones & neurotransmitters require it as raw material. Bears (in the wild) have average cholesterol of 400, & never die of cardio-vascular disease…

kamoalii
Member
👍25
kamoalii

General Impression: Mauldin has a slew of loser heath stocks they never talk about. Recommendations that have gone so far south they are close to the pole. I’ve followed this particular group for a few years. My take is that the outlook of the letter and Maulden in general with regard to personal health is pretty ‘average’ curve interpretation. If you live out on the upper tail of the health curve….you get plenty of exercise, eat well, don’t smoke, drink alcohol or consume too much sugar, watch your weight and think and read. You are long beyond most of what… Read More »

krinkle
Member
👍57

Right. When young and dumb, I read Mauldin weekly. Then I realized he was in it for the lifestyle, and full of Poppycock. I dropped my interest, maybe 20 years ago! I take no drugs, try to avoid GMO’s, cook fresh, from scratch, and exercise 15-40minutes daily. I’m very healthy and get good sleep. Yes, I believe vitamins are necessary, too. No fear of COVID, but I am respectful of it.

ebernie
Guest
ebernie

I have invested in Mauldin recommend stocks Nanoviricide and Biotime, and wish I had not. Bernie Ebner

brenton
Guest
brenton

I’ll pass. Cholesterol is not the enemy people believe it to be, and the evidence supporting the use of Statins or any cholesterol lowering drug is shaky.

Richard VEDDER
Guest
Richard VEDDER

amen

ugotstyle
Member
👍-11
ugotstyle

Hi Travis,

Which cryptocurrencies do you believe are the best investments today?

btb754
Irregular
👍7

The LDL-C story is becoming more nuanced. In addition to mortality differences based on LDL particle size, there is increasing evidence of an inverse relationship between LDL and mortality in older adults. This is a specific study: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/518416_1. This is the , meta-analysis that kicked off the discussion: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/6/e010401 . And this is an example of the statin industry’s counterattacks : https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/expert-reaction-to-systematic-review-reporting-lack-of-an-association-between-ldl-cholesterol-and-mortality-in-the-elderly/

David Paton, MD, DSc, FRCPC
Guest
David Paton, MD, DSc, FRCPC