Marketimer

Overall Rating

Rating: 3.2/5. From 22 votes.
Please wait...
3.5
Rating from 99 votes
If you’ve subscribed to Marketimer, please click the stars below to indicate your rating for this newsletter, and please share any other feedback about your experience using the comment box below.

Investment Performance

Rating from 31 votes
Rating: 3.8/5. From 31 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 12 Votes
  • 4 Stars 10 Votes
  • 3 Stars 4 Votes
  • 2 Stars 2 Votes
  • 1 Stars 3 Votes

Quality Of Writing/Analysis

Rating from 22 votes
Rating: 3.9/5. From 22 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 9 Votes
  • 4 Stars 7 Votes
  • 3 Stars 2 Votes
  • 2 Stars 2 Votes
  • 1 Stars 2 Votes

Value For Price

Rating from 24 votes
Rating: 3.2/5. From 24 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 4 Votes
  • 4 Stars 9 Votes
  • 3 Stars 4 Votes
  • 2 Stars 2 Votes
  • 1 Stars 5 Votes

Customer Service

Rating from 22 votes
Rating: 3.2/5. From 22 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 4 Votes
  • 4 Stars 6 Votes
  • 3 Stars 6 Votes
  • 2 Stars 2 Votes
  • 1 Stars 4 Votes
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jackattacl
Irregular
Jackattacl
February 7, 2009 6:28 pm

Bob Brinker’s “Marketimer” is published monthly at a cost of $185 per year. Mr Brinker, who also hosts a radio show of the same name, has a Wall Street background and the newletter has been around many years. His 3 model portfolios range from aggressive to balanced risk levels and date back to 1988. I believe he does well consistently in the Hulbert rankings of stock newsletters. It’s hard to tell how well his portfolios are performing in the monthly newsletter since all performance tracking is done since inception. So, a portfolio may have grown to $200,000 from $40,000 since 1990 but you have no idea what it’s done in 1yr/3yr/5yr intervals. All the portfolios are composed of no load mutual funds,many of them Vanguard funds, some are index funds. Also, the portfolios rarely changed over the 3 years I was a subscriber. There is a short list (10 or so) of individual stocks and ETF’s but only funds in the portfolios. The 8 page report contains thoughtful commentary on the economy, the market, monetary policy,Federal Reserve updates, equity evaluations and investor sentiment. His approach is definitely conservative but, for someone audacious enough to call his newsletter “Marketimer,” he totally missed the downturn in October. Thats when I stopped reading and decided to not renew in December.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
899
John
Guest
John
February 17, 2009 9:32 am

Mostly dealing with mutual funds. Has been right in the past but totally missed the October downturn. Will not be renewing.

Add a Topic
334
Brenda E
Member
Brenda E
February 23, 2009 12:46 pm

We have subscribed to Bob Brinker’s Marketimer newsletter since 2002. From our experience, he has been consistently right in both direction and timing. In 2003, we heeded his subscriber bulletin and literally doubled our 401K holdings. The criticism that he missed the October downturn is not acutally valid in that he held the line in advising cost-dollar-averaging for new money throughout the period and predicted the bottoms very closely, only then giving a buy signal recently. He has missed a little on the depth of this bottom, but we remain confident in his forecasts and trust his models and very extensive research. Again in his defense, I don’t believe anyone saw all of this coming to the degree that it has this year. We will continue to consider the $185.00/yr subscription price the best money we spend all year.

Add a Topic
144
Carol
Guest
Carol
March 29, 2009 6:52 pm

I think Brinker’s commentaries on the market are solid, but the 2008 meltdown was much worse than the dot com bubble. He told everyone to go to cash at that time, so people thought he was a good market timer. I kept waiting for him to go to cash, but it did not happen. That is my fault. During 2008, with all of the financial issues, he stayed in the market and instructed to continue dollar cost averaging into the market. EVentually, we will hit the bottom. I think he should have been much more aware of the financial crisis and much more proactive. No one should follow any adviser blindly. Know your risk.

Nina Milber
Guest
Nina Milber
June 6, 2009 7:12 pm

As a listener since 1987 I strongly believe that Bob is an exceptional well read indivdual with the in depth financial knowledge base most dream of having. That is why I feel, unless he was (to use his words) “out to lunch” OR LAID UP IN A HOSPITAL BED W/O ANY OUTSIDE CONTACT – during the housing bubble of 2006, 2007, and 2008, etc., Bear Stearns disaster, etc., knowing as he discussed on his show, mortage back securities issues, Bear Stearns disaster, the double top in the markets in 2007, AND all the economic news surrounding the mess as early as 2008, Bob Brinker had not one once of loyalty to his subscribers in warning them – at least – in Jan. 2008, that we were headed for at least a recession. His loyalty is to t