Become a Member

Kent Moors’ “Polymorphic Oil” and the $2 Microcap Selling “Liquid Technology” to the Military

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, September 3, 2015

This ad is particularly ridiculous.

Just wanted to get that off my chest — I know that I look at absurd, hype-filled ads every day, and that I should be getting jaded by now… but this one stands out as more absurd than most.

But, of course, I’m primarily here to give you answers and explanation — so let’s get to it. What is the “$2 Microcap” that Kent Moors is teasing us about in his effort to lure subscribers into his $3,500 Micro Energy Trader?

Here’s a little summary of his pitch from the order form, to give you the flavor:

“I’ve been waiting four years for the right moment to recommend this stock to you (and it’s TODAY).

“As energy’s ultimate insider, I’ve been watching this firm like a hawk since 2011โ€ฆ

“Waiting for the right moment to recommend it to my Micro Energy Trader readers.

“And right now โ€“ in addition to its incredibly lucrative deals with the Pentagonโ€ฆ

“The firm I’m talking about also has millions’ worth of supply deals and partnerships in place with a stunning list of household-name companies.

“And with every passing dayโ€ฆ

“They’re bringing larger and larger quantities of their ‘polymorphic oil’ to the consumer market through these deals and partnerships.”

Sounds compelling, right?

Let’s go in and check the specific clues so we can find the stock for you — that way, you can do your own research and think for yourself… then, if you feel like it, you can send your $3,500 to Kent Moors if you like. Or to me, if you prefer. Or maybe you could just take a nice vacation, or actually buy the stock with that money if it seems compelling to you… your call.

Some of the clues that we can toss into the Thinkolator as we seek our answer:

“The key to this opportunity is a world-changing new liquid that’s being pumped into a procession of unmarked tanker trucks right now…

“Even as you read this, these trucks are rolling out of a small American company’s nondescript โ€“ yet highly secure โ€“ production facility in the Midwest.

“Why all the secrecy and security?

“I’ll explain that fully in just a moment. But the crux of it is that this tiny company has pioneered an incredible new ‘polymorphic’ substance…

“And that substance is about to transform dozens of global industries worth at least $3.1 trillion per year….

“This firm will soon be a household name, with a sky-high share price to match.

“That’s because what’s going into those Plain Jane trucks today…

“Will be in virtually everything you rely on for day-to-day living tomorrow.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“The clothing on your back and the carpet under your feet.

“The soaps and cosmetics in your bathroom, and the detergents under your sink.

“The lubricants, paints, solvents, and chemicals in your garage โ€“ and the plastics you see everywhere around you.

“Even the foods you eat will soon contain the incredible substance I’m talking about.”

OK, so it’s a company making some kind of oil — used to make biofuels and as a food and cosmetics ingredient and feedstock for chemicals. That means we’ve probably got our answer already, but let’s check some of the specific clues just to make sure.

First, the ridiculous gains promised:

“I’m talking about the chance to score up to 10,000% returns or more over just the next few years…

“Plus multiple triple-digit wins of up to 542% in the coming months…”

Then, after he spends a few pages reminding us that he’s the foremost expert on energy, with every CEO and scientist and key energy person in his Rolodex, we get some more clues…

“The Pentagon is handing you this win on a silver platter….

“The revolutionary new substance I’ve been telling you about is also going to change the liquid fuels game forever (I’ll show you how in a second).

“That’s why the DoD has quietly purchased $510 million worth of marine and aviation fuels derived from this new technology for testing and evaluation.

“Now, to put this in perspective for you โ€“ right now, at this ground-floor stage…

“That $510 million deal alone is more than twice the size of the micro-cap company pioneering this breakthrough.

“And if I’m right, this firm will land hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of military contracts in the future….

“This firm’s high-tech “super-fuel” blends have aced the military’s rigorous testing with flying colors so far.

“Not only do they meet the DoD’s “drop in” specs for HRD-76 and HRJ-5 marine and aviation fuels…

“But they run far cleaner than the conventional fuels currently in use.

“As if that weren’t enough…

“This company’s fuels recently set the Navy speed record for a surface ship โ€“ a top speed of 50 knots.

“That’s over 57 miles per hour for a full-sized warship!”

Ugh. So this is why the ad makes me extra-grouchy… it’s the idea that this company somehow won $510 million in business from the Pentagon, did so “recently,” and also “recently” set the Navy speed record.

Because the $510 million investment is the joint investment of several agencies into helping to spur a biofuels market, and it was announced in 2011 and designed to be a three year commitment… though it wasn’t embraced very thoroughly by the military when defense cuts hit the budget shortly afterward. And it wasn’t a $510 million award to one company, not even close — it was designed to spur private investment, with contracts up for bid to lots of different companies with different technologies and strategies. The company being teased here did indeed receive substantial military funding including $10 million to help set up refineries in 2010, and $12 million to supply fuel for an alternative fuel exercise in 2011, but the total revenue for the company being teased here over the last four years is only about $180 million.

And it did help fuel that record-setting naval ship, but that was also not “recently” and wasn’t nearly as impressive as the hype would have you believe. It was for an amphibious landing craft, and it set a speed record for a naval ship using alternative fuels. Those ships are designed to travel with a full load at 40+ knots (full load meaning a tank and a bunch of troops, apparently), and from what I read they can generally hit speeds of 70 knots without a load. And it’s a high-speed amphibious landing craft, not what most folks would call a “full-sized warship” … big Navy destroyers can be very fast, but more like 30-40 knots fast at the very top end. The test was designed to make sure that the fuel is not inferior, and I suppose it did that.

So what is the company that Kent Moors has been watching since 2011? He’s teasing Solazyme (SZYM), the company that makes oil from algae… and they haven’t had a good show as a public company so far, they hit their all-time highs not long after they IPO’d in 2011 and the stock is now down about 90% from those levels. It’s now a tiny little company, with a market cap just below $200 million, and they’ve never come close to making money… but they are still pushing forward with commercializing their algae-derived oils, and they have had some minor success in terms of getting producers to use their products and in developing their own high-end cosmetics using these specialized oils.

The claim to fame for Solazyme, as I understand it, is that they use genetically engineered microalgae to turn feedstocks into oil very quickly, and that they can engineer very precise high-quality oils for high-value end customers. The original headline promise was for this algae-derived oil as a transportation fuel, but without truly dramatic subsidies that’s likely never going to be feasible, at least not in the next five or ten years without technological or other breakthroughs, so last year the company really committed to a switch in strategy to focus much more on food additives, cosmetics, and high-specification oils. That means they can sell their oils for much higher prices, but it also means they have to create consumer demand and convince major consumer product and industrial companies to test their products and use them as an ingredient, and it means they also have to be either dramatically higher quality or deserving of a price premium, or they have to be price-competitive versus various other oils (vegetable, petroleum, whatever)… maybe both, since they’re so new and — compared to existing vegetable oils and the like — so untested and unknown.

The stock has been teased at least once a year or so by a variety of different newsletters, and you can see why it’s a great story — the military biofuels stuff is kind of cool, and there was real R&D funding for that and may be again in the future (though I wouldn’t count on it, the strategic imperative was “reduce reliance on foreign oil” but booming US oil production and low prices have dampened that imperative), and the end markets for their cosmetics and food additives and specialized oils are potentially huge, everything from cooking oil to drilling lubricants that can be made better, more robust, cleaner, and without fossil fuels… but though the story is pretty compelling, the business has been anything but. They have been beset by the costs and delays of their complicated projects, including their ambitious joint venture refinery in Moema, Brazil that’s taken years to get built and running and is still having significant challenges, and they’ve almost run out of that easy early funding from the IPO and research grants and there’s not much indication (to me, at least) that the company is ready to stand on its own as a commercial venture.

The question, really, is whether Kent Moors the self-proclaimed “ultimate energy insider” is right about Solazyme finally becoming a good investment, after so many years of disappointments and delays — either because the company has advanced to the point of commercial production and can start to fund its own operations, or just because it’s now so much cheaper than it was in past years and might eventually become a good business.

Are they really going to hit commercial scale soon, and begin to think about making a profit?

There’s no evidence of that in the numbers yet (they have consistently had expenses that are 2-3X their revenues over the past four years), but past results don’t necessarily tell us whether they’re on the cusp of something better. And analysts aren’t much help, since there are only a few analysts making forecasts and they’re all over the map (and they’re probably trying to get a piece of the capital raising that SZYM will probably need within the next year or so, too) — but even though analysts, on average, think revenues will climb by 150% next year, they still expect the company to lose $1.10 per share in 2016. That’s better than last year, and probably better than this year will turn out, but that’s still a lot of money for a company whose shares trade right around $2 (and which has already had “losses” of more than $6 a share over its 4+ years as a public company).

The company has indicated that they expect revenue to rise substantially in the second half of 2015 and into next year, but from their results so far they’re probably going to fall short of their own forecasts for the rest of 2015 — particularly if their cosmetics line, Algenist, doesn’t resume rapid growth from here (indications are that growth might be slowing down for that product line, which is the only profitable product and brand Solazyme has so far).

They have two major refineries for producing their algae oils, both of which are nowhere near being profitable operations — the Clinton plant in Iowa, and the Moema plant in Brazil. They have a few different branded products they’re trying to build, including Algenist and AlgaPur in cosmetics (Algenist is their brand, they sell AlgaPur as an ingredient that’s being tried by BASF, Natura and Unilever) but also a culinary vegetable oil replacement called Algawise (higher smoke point, lower saturated fat than canola or olive oil) protein/fat replacement powders that are branded AlgaVia, a biodiesel called Soladiesel, a drilling lubricant called Encapso. Some of these are actually commercial, as in things that are being bought by customers as ingredients for products that are actively being produced for sale, but those sales are still quite tiny compared to the size of Solazyme’s investment and in most cases, with the possible exception of Algenist, they aren’t really mainstream… I think it’s probably fair to call many of these test or pilot projects, and in many cases — like Soladiesel — they’re competing with other “alternative” fuels from much larger and more established producers (biodiesel, in that case, which can apparently be made much more cheaply and quickly from vegetable oil than from algae so far).

So I have a hard time seeing it, frankly — I appreciate that these algae oils could theoretically work as a major feedstock, once many, many more large refineries are built and optimized (they have two now, both joint ventures, and neither can come close to paying for itself yet), but that requires both many more years of R&D and expansion investment and — unless there’s some commercial breakthrough where consumers demand AlgaVia and pay huge premiums to get AlgaVia products — a major societal push to create oil from non-petroleum and non-canola sources. This will probably require subsidies either by customers or by the government for a very long time (or, as we’ve seen over the last few years, hundreds of millions of dollars of investment by SZYM and their competitors), particularly where they compete with the dramatically larger and more efficient fossil fuels industry. Even with oil at $100, few were clamoring for Solazyme’s biodiesel… with oil at $40, someone who doesn’t care about profits (like the government) would have to push to get biodiesel’s share of the market to grow.

Of course, Solazyme realizes this — that’s why they’re shying away from biodiesel, effectively just staying involved as a way to put a pin in a future possible product line… and it doesn’t help that they’re even seeing that their high-end lubricant products, like Encapso, require high oil prices (meaning, lots more drilling activity) to thrive. Their strategy shift means that they have become ever more dependent on commercializing their higher-end cosmetics and food ingredients, and while the scale of production should be jumping pretty substantially over the next year or so it remains to be seen whether anyone can guess at when those products become profitable enough to offset the high cost of convincing customers to use their products, let alone the actual production costs and continued R&D investments.

Four years after going public, this is still a start-up trying to revolutionize several industries — it looks to me like it’s going to take several more years of patience. And I don’t have Kent Moors’ contacts and have only looked at the stock for a couple hours this afternoon, but I don’t see any sign at all of big military contracts boosting them anytime soon or of a renewed alternative energy push from the Pentagon — even if they were going to get additional biofuels funding, you’d think the military wouldn’t go out of their way to fund Solazyme’s major capital sponge, the Moema joint venture with Bunge, because that’s a foreign venture in Brazil and that kind of makes the “domestic energy security” talk sound silly.

It’s arguably a bit unfair to apply conventional financial metrics to an industrial biotech startup like this, but it is at least positive that the shares now trade at 3X sales instead of the 16X sales you would have paid a couple years ago when the Motley Fool was teasing the stock at about $15, or 9X sales last year when Jimmy Mengel touted it at $7 as the “God Complex” company.

Compared to those two, $2.25 looks pretty good — and they have plenty of cash to get through the next five or six quarters at their current burn rate — but the stock has traded fairly close to the current price for most of the past year (since the November 2014 collapse), and most of the rational-sounding analysts seem to be emphasizing the need for patience (there are some interesting recent free articles from the Fool on SZYM here and here to give some perspective, and there’s a nice, positive non-investing article about the company here). I wouldn’t go in with the expectation of good news or profits anytime real soon… but then again, I’m not an advisor to oil sheikhs and I don’t hobnob with heads of state.

It’s also possible, given the huge predictions from Moors for short-term gains, that he’s recommending something other than buying just the straight equity in Solazyme — SZYM does have options trading, so you could perhaps get a bit more leverage by selling puts or buying calls if you think the stock is going to do well over the next six months or so, or trading around a position… though most of the contracts don’t seem to trade in enough volume to absorb the action provided by a newsletter recommendation.

For his predictions that you could see gains of 10,000%, I assume he’s just extrapolating something far out into the future, when Solazyme might conceivably grow to become a major supplier. I suppose that’s theoretically possible, even if my lack of imagination means I don’t find it exceedingly plausible — by way of comparison, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), which we now think of as a long-standing and indispensable giant in the ingredients industry, took 35 years or so show 10,000% gains in its stock price… and at the beginning of that spurt, in the early 1970s, they were already quite profitable and had annual revenues of about $7 billion (inflation adjusted).

Of course, what Kent Moors and I think doesn’t matter all that much — it’s your money, after all, not his or mine. All I can tell you is that his teased “Polymorphic Oil” stock is Solazyme… the rest is up to you. So what do you think, ready to bet on the microalgae oil future with Solazyme… or not so interested? Let us know with a comment below.

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

85 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
william stevenson
Member
william stevenson
September 3, 2015 6:13 pm

thanks for the info on Solazyme. I was struck my Dr. Moore’s apparent effort to raise a quick million just based on that ad. something’s fishy.

TheMerlin
Member
TheMerlin
September 4, 2015 6:09 pm

I’m always bothered by these hype’s where they take a bazillion words to say what could be said in a simple paragraph. I listened to Bill Bonner last night…know exactly what I was doing where he went on and on and on. I remember when he started his company and was looking for editors who could write HYPE for an offering and/or to get you to sign up for a newsletter. Bonner has become a multi-millionaire doing this and those writing the hypes make out very well too. So, any time I see an Agora hype or a Steve Sjuggerud – Stansberry Research because if I recall correctly he was associated with Bonner early on…I just pass. What gets me is how they fabricate. I’ve gotten to where I can see through them without my crypton glasses. It’s all just one big business preying on those looking for the Goose and the Golden Egg. Stock Gumshoe and the members comments are far better than any of these Charlestons.

Add a Topic
4389
Add a Topic
6137
Add a Topic
2626
terry
Member
terry
September 19, 2015 8:23 pm

I don’t hink it is solazyme he is referring to they are not in the mid west I think I found the stock he is referring to

Add a Topic
5971
terry
Member
terry
September 19, 2015 8:30 pm

I don’t tjink solazyme is the stock moors is talking about

Add a Topic
5971
Eliot
Member
Eliot
September 3, 2015 6:30 pm

I just love this column! Cuts right through all the bureaucratic BS and nails it on the head.

frank
September 3, 2015 7:10 pm

it is a couple of years that dr moore is trying with this stock if we can call it a stock, also Michael robinson has been pushing klh wich is not going anywhere, and a couple of days ago the company made a reversal split without any guarantees that the stock will make to the Nasdaq market .

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
1251
Phoenix2006
Phoenix2006
September 3, 2015 7:42 pm

I have been a subscriber of his for a year or so. Impressed by his HUGH CREDENTIALS, NOT SURE WHAT IN. Any way, I jumped on several of his issues & I can say, I never made a dime! The last few months ,all I get is sell this & that. I’m out.
Bill

๐Ÿ‘ 21
Peter Barrett
Member
Peter Barrett
September 4, 2015 3:35 am
Reply to  Phoenix2006

A always Travis Johnson cuts through all the spurious garbage and gives us a much more balanced view; the quality of his research is incredible.
I subscribed to a few issues of the Doctor and learnt the hard way so I am also out.
The US share research newsletters take first prize for repeating the same thing is dozens of different ways and I think Kent Moors is possibly the worst of all the tip sheets .
We have one in the UK called Research Investments, it is written by Dr Mike Tubbs a Physicist, who has spent his working life in R & D departments of large companies.
His recommendations have beaten just about every fund manager in the UK hands down and have saved my portfolio from oblivion. Very few of his tips turn into losses, you get a newsletter every week but you won’t get a new tip every week, however, you very rarely get a recommendation to sell . It costs Cยฃ400 ($260).

Good investing

Peter Barrett

Add a Topic
1567
Don
Guest
Don
September 8, 2015 9:53 pm
Reply to  Phoenix2006

I used to read his summaries and he appeared to have millions with the way he talked
but he lives on some road in Pennsylvania out in the boondocks and now I just go
straight to Stock Gumshoe for the latest song and dance.

Add a Topic
5971
Ed McLeod
Member
Ed McLeod
September 10, 2015 5:41 pm
Reply to  Don

Don says:
> … but he lives on some road in Pennsylvania out in the boondocks … <

That's not necessarily a negative. If I had billions, I sure as heck wouldn't want to live in Maryland or New Jersey (or Connecticut or New York, either). Something like 2400 acres in western PA or southeastern OH sounds pretty good, given the times. Maybe I'd keep a 2nd home in FL for wintertime.

Dave Miller
Member
Dave Miller
September 3, 2015 8:13 pm

Love you Travis. What a great service you provide ! Keep it up, PLEASE ! Dave

๐Ÿ‘ 21793
PATRICIA ANN VASQUEZ
September 3, 2015 8:24 pm

DO YOU THINK IT COULD BE Sasol (SSL) MADE FIRST IN AFRICA AND NOW A PLANT IS SOON TO OPEN IN THE U.S.; BUT I THOUGHT THEY WERE BUILDINGT THE FIRST ONE IN LOUISANA.. OR MAYBE THE LITTLE OKLAHOMA DRILLER, LAREDO PETROLEUM (LPI) THAT’S DRILLING FOR $12.00 BBL JUST GUESSES. I TRIED BOTH BEFORE; BUT ALSO SOLD THEM. THEY WEREN’T AS GREATAS MR. MOORS IS STATING. GOOD LUCK!

Add a Topic
430
Add a Topic
22
๐Ÿ‘ 21793
ccarter
ccarter
September 3, 2015 8:26 pm

I can’t stand this guy or anything to do with Money Map Press. How the hell he/they can sleep at night is beyond me. Don’t need to spend $3500 for bad advise when I can get it for free. Stay away from this guy.

Add a Topic
605
Moose West
Guest
Moose West
September 8, 2015 11:10 am
Reply to  ccarter

$3500 can buy him a very comfortable pillow to help him sleep at night.

PATRICIA ANN VASQUEZ
September 3, 2015 8:30 pm

NOT A REPLY— A QUESTION. DOES ANYONE KNOW ABOUT THE STOCK/SYMBOL FOR OBAMA’S SECRET PIPELINE? OR THE SMALL COMPANY IN LITTLETON, COLORADO THAT IS SUPPOSE TO MAKE US ALL RICH ON THEIR LITTLE GOLD CHIP FOR THE CREDIT CARDS. STOCK /SYMBOL PLEASE -THANK YOU! I HATE TO PAY THOSE BIG BUCKS THAT THEY WANT WHEN ALL OF OUR HEADS MAY FIGURE THE ANSWERS. HUH?

Add a Topic
210
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
372
๐Ÿ‘ 21793
LV Hayes
Member
LV Hayes
September 6, 2015 4:03 am

The little company in Littleton is CPI Group, which has no symbol because it is privately owned and unlisted. According to MoneyMapPress gurus, CPI intends to have an IPO in the near future. Meanwhile, some of them have been hawking “patent stakes” in CPI, but their own customer service reps could not tell me how to acquire these. I don’t know if this is an outright con or somebody is just confused, but I’m rapidly losing confidence. BTW, I bought 2 “wonder” stocks recommended by PiledHighandDeep Moors and both have lost money ever since. Caveat emptor, as the Romans used to say.

Add a Topic
636
altomaremarie
altomaremarie
September 3, 2015 9:03 pm

So Dr. Moors is essentially a blatant liar. Just goes to

show you- never trust a guy who still uses a Rolodex.

๐Ÿ‘ 16
pam day
Guest
pam day
September 3, 2015 9:20 pm

His ego is what drives ne away from his service ! thank you Travis for all you do!

Dave S
Dave S
September 3, 2015 9:53 pm

Forget about any quick entry into the ultra slow food industry either. No one in the food industry is entertaining any nonGMO or nonorganic products right now not to mention the need for 2 years of R&D and product evaluation before pulling the trigger on any new ingredient.

Ronald E. Baker
Irregular
Ronald E. Baker
September 3, 2015 11:59 pm

Everyone is discovering “Dr. Kent Moors” really is a charlatan and windbag. It takes time, but this guy must be exposed and debunked again and again. He claims to be a “Professor” at Duquesne Univ. in Pittsburgh. Look that one up and you’ll find his name isn’t listed in any function there. How can anyone who reads up on this guy believe a single word of his hyperbole? He is downright dangerous to the interests of retail investors, with scam promotion after promotion. Like the price of oil is set to rise when it hit $50 per bbl earlier in 2015; or Coober Peddy, a huge opportunity for oil & gas in Australia, find out all for a $750 membership in his oil inner circle.

Add a Topic
1567
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
๐Ÿ‘ 21793
Brian
Guest
Brian
September 4, 2015 10:35 am

Professor of Political Science – yep, great credentials to make him an energy insider!

Ian S
Ian S
September 7, 2015 5:21 pm
Reply to  Brian

Kent is an oil expert. Snake Oil. In one of his pitches he describes flying to England for a meeting with Oil insiders at Windsor Castle, about 20 miles from my house. His description of the weather was completely false, showing he was never in the area at the time. He is less often correct than a stopped clock.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
jake
jake
September 7, 2015 9:16 pm

Travis, I just checked the Duquesne website and found that although Moor is not listed as a faculty member, the school does show five or six papers he has presented this year. What is not shown is where they were presented whether they were presented at public policy or political science meetings. I have “kind of” followed Moor for several years and kept wondering how he was able to maintain his teaching and research responsibilities and at the same time whiz around the world meeting the rich and famous and discussing a multitude of energy companies. I am very skeptical of Moor’s professional activities, but then again perhaps I should be humbled for the Duquesne University website does show that he recently has had a book published.

๐Ÿ‘ 2
phil wojo
Guest
phil wojo
September 4, 2015 3:00 am

Many of us had wondered about the dramatic drop in the price of oil. It was as if someone realized that we were about to experience a major shift to an alternative. Kent”s commentary is quick to point out that this product comes from thin air No animals, vegantables or mining extracts were harmed in its creation. No cost of ingredients? No ingredients? Only a rollodex professor could imagine the wonders of how it provides the substance of everything. Its “polymorphic”! Fans of Marketwatch will remember the columns about the world’s long term need for agriculture to support the growing population, and how the big thinkers have largely ignored the issue. Here we have something from nothing to provide the substance of sustenance. Soon we will see it provide a mere 10,000 % increase in value. That alone rivals the increase in money supply at no cost! Wow.. We should seek a better snail blue blood, now polymorphic oil salesman.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
25
Add a Topic
359
๐Ÿ‘ 21793
Gerhard
September 4, 2015 3:12 am

Hi Travis
Thanks again for nailing it as soon as the BS is touted. This is the one service I will stay a paid-up member of as long as I have investments in the USA.
Kind regards from Pretoria (South Africa)

Gerhard

Add a Topic
22
Doc
Guest
Doc
September 4, 2015 5:57 am

Travis, could Moors be used as a contrary indicator in as much as one might consider shorting any and all of his hyperecomendations, or are the stocks he pushes generally to thin to realistically short?

Add a Topic
899
Bill
Member
September 4, 2015 6:19 am

Travis you are a genius!!!!!!!!! I tried to find this out for myself using Google and could not.
You balanced insights are greatly appreciated. I will subscribe to the irregulars!!!!
Instead of SZYM could it be AMRS Amtris @$1.71 and a market cap of $170m?

Bill
Member
September 4, 2015 6:54 am

Apologies the correction … Amyris Inc(NASDAQ:AMRS) Market cap $263 m

๐Ÿ‘ 21793
Frank A
Guest
Frank A
September 4, 2015 1:20 pm

Thanks for your analysis. Indeed it is good to counter Moors hyperbole.

Jodie
Guest
Jodie
September 4, 2015 1:28 pm

Okay, I’ll admit that I’m a newbie and am trying to learn the lingo and my way around the stock market and did pay Keith Fitz-Gerald $79 for his high velocity windfalls. What I hate is all the emails like the one you are talking about. 300 people my ass. And I really do think it is a way to line their pockets with money. I simply delete all the other messages. “You have 24 hours, no wait, you have 12 hours, no wait, I’m giving you a second chance so you have until tomorrow.” What a bunch of BS. What I’m not going to do is buy SZYM! Thank you for your honest opinion.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
372
Add a Topic
906
๐Ÿ‘ 21793
goon_69_36330
Member
goon_69_36330
September 25, 2015 3:41 am
Reply to  Jodie

I am right there with you Jodie. I paid the $79 for Fitz-Gerald’s windfalls as well. I can’t delete their emails fast enough. And like you said, it’s always giving me another chance to get into something else. If I wanted to get into it I would have at the beginning. I will be deleting his future emails except the ones that have lower priced stocks on them. I did make my money back on two of his stocks he has recommended, but I may take my $300 and run and make sure I cancel my subscription immediately. This is the website I need to be on because this is filled with everyday people who cut through the BS. Thanks Travis. I am glad I found your site.

Opposeablethumb
Irregular
September 4, 2015 2:40 pm

If I had a legitimate stock to invest in I would not need $3500.00 to tell you.
I would invest all my money into it and then tell everyone in the universe for free.
Why would I only want to make a measly million on a cant’ miss once in a lifetime opportunity?

Add a Topic
5971
๐Ÿ‘ 1313

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x