Become a Member

A “Rule Breaker” and some “Cloud Disruptors”… A Smorgasbord of “Secret” Fool Picks

Checking in on a new teaser pitch from Tom Gardner's Motley Fool Cloud Disruptors 2020, as well as a "recent IPO" spiel from brother David Gardner's Rule Breakers newsletter.

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, April 13, 2020

The Motley Fool put together a new push for Tom Gardner’s “no. 1 technology investment” late last week, including yet another “presentation” with Tom Gardner, Eric Bleeker and Tim Beyers, so we’ve gotten quite a few questions… and I also got a few other questions this week about a David Gardner teaser pitch, so we’re going to double up and cover both of those today, a little more briefly than usual.

The first spiel is all about “Cloud Computing” as the Fool sells their Motley Fool Cloud Disruptors service. I looked through the clues to see if they had added anything since we covered a similar ad five or six weeks ago, and there isn’t a lot to add… but they do throw one or two new ideas out there in the email teasers.

The first wave of Fool “Cloud Computing” promotion was actually selling a different service, IPO Trailblazers, but it was sold with the same kind of “presentation” with the same people, and built around five cloud computing ideas that they called the “FAZER” stocks, since everyone loves a good acronym… the idea being that the cloud will be the next big thing after the FAANG stocks.

Here’s the Quick Take I shared with the Irregulars back on March 2, when I covered that teaser pitch:

Irregulars Quick Take
Newsletter: Motley Fool IPO Trailblazers
Stocks: Fastly (FSLY), Appian (APPN), Zoom Video (ZM), Elastic (ESTC), Roku (ROKU)
Travis’ take: This is a teaser ad for a presentation the Fool is doing tomorrow about “FAZER” stocks that could be the “next FAANG” ideas, small growth stocks to hopefully repeat the success of huge past winners like Netflix. I like Roku and Fastly and now own both (Trade Note: I just bought ROKU for the first time today after researching it again for this article, mostly because of the accelerating sales growth), and I find Elastic appealing but haven’t bitten yet after their “bounce back” quarter… Appian and Zoom I don’t find personally appealing, Appian because I don’t know what the real long-term opportunity is and growth is very weak given their valuation, and Zoom because I don’t understand how they can be meaningfully better than lots of other videoconferencing tools and justify their 50X sales valuation.

So I can’t tell you for sure whether those five IPO Trailblazers ideas are also Cloud Disruptors recommendations, but I’d guess that most of them are (those are two different services in the Fool’s “Discovery” series of products — which generally cost about $2,000 a year, are nonrefundable, and offer somewhat of a “portfolio guidance” service and a model portfolio instead of just monthly recommendations, but the sales pitch for them is so similar, recently, as to be almost identical).

But what I can do is look at the few hints that Eric Bleeker dropped in his email, which gets its “urgency” from the fact that our “work from home” and “social distancing” world has changed dramatically and created a new surge of business for cloud computing stocks.

Here are a few of the details from the email I received last week:

“In January The Motley Fool announced our ‘No. 1 technology investment for the new decade’ …

“…. We believed it had the potential to grow 33X in the coming decade and beyond…..

“Now, I’m writing you today with an important update to our ‘No. 1 technology investment’ because recent events have…. Frankly, caused growth rates to surge to levels that were simply unimaginable mere weeks ago.

“Here’s just a sample of some of the growth we’ve been seeing:

“A recent recommendation from Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner has seen demand soar by an incredible 1,900% since just the start of the year…

“Another Motley Fool recommendation whose shares have gained more than 440% just announced that demand for its product jumped tenfold in just two weeks time.

“Even a massive company like Microsoft has seen usage increase. It recently announced a 775% demand spike in areas where “shelter in place orders have been enforced” ….

“… the bottom-line is that the world will likely never be the same. Many stocks have rapidly fallen by 50% or more, and certain industries will struggle to survive this period.

“Meanwhile, changes like social distancing and workers across the country operating remotely are in many cases rapidly accelerating the growth of certain technologies and industries…

“Sometimes pulling forward what could have been a decade of growth into mere months (or even weeks!) of time.”

So that all sounds like they’re just promoting the same kind of “cloud computing” stocks as they were in January, just using the same stock ideas to tout a new service, but there are also two hints about specific stocks in there. Let’s look at them individually:

“A recent recommendation from Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner has seen demand soar by an incredible 1,900% since just the start of the year.”

That one is Zoom Video Communications (ZM), which was one of those FAZER stocks in January. My thinking about it hasn’t changed, though David Gardner continues to double down on it and extoll the huge opportunity they have to maybe become the foundational video conferencing technology on the back of this coronavirus explosion in demand.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


The big risk, recently, is that Zoom’s security flaws have come to the fore during this explosion in use — particularly through “Zoombombing” when people either maliciously or foolishly jump in on other peoples’ conference calls, but also other security flaws that people have been warning about for Zoom since it became a “hot stuff” new IPO last year (one of the more attention-getting notes was that U.S. Senators were advised to stop using Zoom last week). The CEO came out a week or so ago with a “mea culpa” announcement and a promise to refocus on security, but the narrative pretty quickly shifted to, “hmmm, maybe the reason Zoom is the easiest and best service is that they skipped the security work that other videoconferencing companies did.”

I don’t know how it will work out a few years from now, obviously, but Zoom clearly has a huge opportunity thanks to the coronavirus — without spending any extra money on marketing, their usage did indeed surge by 1,900% in the first few months of this year, so even though they gave the service away free to some users (like schools) and the revenue might not surge by that degree immediately, that’s a huge number of consumers who are getting used to the service and generally finding it useful. That has to be balanced by the security backlash, and the company will be monitored closely to see if their security improvements come through as promised, but that kind of new account signups and new visibility is incredibly valuable if they can capitalize on it. Not valuable enough that I can swallow paying 50X revenues for the shares, but maybe you’ll be more inclined to follow David Gardner on this than I am, he certainly has a better record for long-term tech investing than I do.

In case you’re curious to follow up further, David Gardner also featured Zoom as one of his podcast stocks in the free Rule Breaker podcast last week, and my memory is that he indicated on that podcast that he had most recently recommended the stock for Rule Breakers in the $120s, so it’s still close to that neighborhood.

And the other one?

“Another Motley Fool recommendation whose shares have gained more than 440% just announced that demand for its product jumped tenfold in just two weeks time.”

That one is Teladoc (TDOC), another of the “obvious” beneficiaries of the coronavirus because it is dramatically increasing demand for its telemedicine services. The stock has soared, but it’s still fairly small (market cap around $10 billion), and I’d still say that they’re the leader in this space… and also the company that is best-capitalized among the telemedicine players (the other meaningful ones are all private still).

I’ve written about Teladoc a few times this year, starting in January when I bought back into the shares because of management improvements and an appealing new acquisition, and then following up a few times because several newsletters started teasing the stock thanks to its obvious connection to the coronavirus outbreak. Here’s what I noted about a month ago in an updated article about Teladoc:

“I wouldn’t buy just because of this coronavirus scare, but I do think it’s possible that the coronavirus and the possible increase in use of telehealth services will speed up the adoption of telehealth in general and “normalize” that kind of virtual health care interaction for more people, and that would be a good thing for the company as they build their business in the long term. It doesn’t mean they automatically get to hold their early advantage in the market, Teladoc is clearly the leader among “pure play” telehealth companies, but other big tech or healthcare firms could certainly try to develop their own systems, and some already have,

“Amazon, for example, launched Amazon Care in partnership with a local clinic last year, and is pushing it out to more employees during this viral crisis — and it’s entirely possible that if the market decides that Amazon is going to coordinate with its Haven partners (JP Morgan and Berkshire Hathaway) to push Amazon Care out as a national offering for employees, or get more aggressive and release its own telehealth network for anyone to use, then Teladoc might fall 30% that day. People are terrified of competing with Amazon or the other mega-tech stocks, even if the specialized company might end up “winning” anyway (remember Facebook’s plan for dating that was going to crush Tinder and Match.com? MTCH shares cratered by 20% in moments after Facebook announced that service at its developer conference in May of 2018, and then fell again last last year as Facebook dating prepared to roll out after a test run, but if you had bought MTCH shares on the highs the day before Facebook’s 2018 announcement, with the unluckiest buy date possible, and held through all those big swings, including some wild ups and downs, you would have still beaten the market after six months or a year, and as of today your return (about 45%) would be triple the returns you would have gotten from the broader market.

“I’d guess that the increasing adoption of telehealth is going to become an unstoppable trend, perhaps accelerated by this particular outbreak but quite likely to keep growing even without coronavirus, and that this underlying trend will benefit Teladoc nicely in the long run even though they’re not going to be the only provider or network.”

Another risk is that the big push for telemedicine and virtual doctor visits has also loosened the regulations for those kinds of visits. Where an insurer or the government might only have approved of a doctor/patient virtual visit on an approved and regulated platform before, like Teladoc’s, now they’re so desperate to keep patients at home that they’re allowing and approving insurance coverage for virtual visits using standard videocalling tools like Skype or FaceTime or, perhaps, even Zoom. I assume that once the crisis passes those rules will tighten back up again, and the purpose-built video platforms like Teladoc will be preferred over generic video calling services like Skype, but that’s not guaranteed. Right now, Teladoc and the other established providers are facing such dramatic demand that they can’t keep up, but once the dust settles it will be interesting to see how the market shakes up. I’d be willing to keep adding to TDOC on dips, and most recently bought in March at about $125, but I don’t feel compelled to “chase” the stock at this point. Certainly David Gardner would disagree, since one of his criteria for Rule Breakers is that he wants to buy stocks that have surged and proven that they’re popular with investors.

(And yes, Teladoc was also another one of the “5 Stocks for the Coronavirus” picks on the Rule Breakers podcast last week — if you’re curious about that and don’t want to sit through the podcast, the other three were Sea Limited (SE), a SE Asian gaming/ecommerce company, and the fairly self-explanatory “stay at home” picks Roku (ROKU) and Peloton (PTON))

So I don’t know whether the “Cloud Disruptors” service currently recommends all of these stocks, but it seems very likely that their initial portfolio would include Teladoc (TDOC) as well as the “FAZER” stocks Fastly (FSLY), Appian (APPN), Zoom Video (ZM), Elastic (ESTC) and Roku (ROKU). I agree that cloud computing will be a clear growth trend for many years and own some of these currently (ROKU, FSLY and TDOC), though the valuations are always challenging so investors should certainly expect a lot of volatility — which means that if you like them, there will probably also be terrible days when it’s easier to justify buying them.

And I also said I’d add another pick to the “smorgasbord” here — this is the teaser pitch I’ve gotten a few questions about in recent days, under the subject line “This Stock Could Be Like Buying Amazon in 1997”:

“You see, I recently stumbled onto a practically unknown (yet publicly traded) company following so closely in Amazon’s footsteps that it has seriously caught the attention of David Gardner — a legendary investor who actually did buy Amazon back in 1997 and racked up over 36,624% gains in the process…

“While you can’t go back in time and invest in Amazon alongside David Gardner, I believe I’m offering you the next best thing…

“The chance to get in early on David’s new recent-IPO stock.

“First, the stock has already shot up like a rocket ship, more than doubling in the past year.

“Second, the company has nearly doubled its paying members over the past four years.

“And it has dominant market share, owning four of the five top brands in its space.

“Even more exciting, management expects double-digit revenue growth going forward.

“That’s the type of growth and market opportunity that gets David Gardner’s heart pumping.”

So this one is a pitch for Rule Breakers, the “growthier” of the relatively low-cost entry-level newsletters from the Fool (the other one is their “flagship”, Stock Advisor, which includes picks selected by both David and Tom Gardner each month).

And it’s pitching this as an “Early Bird Stock Event” because they argue that “early movers have the best chance of success,” so I’m a little disappointed to have to reveal to you that this is an old and oft-touted stock from them, not a brand new idea — what they’re pitching with this “recent IPO” is, in fact, the same “recent IPO” they started touting almost exactly four years ago, Match Group (MTCH).

Yes, Match can still be called a “recent” IPO, though that’s only because “recent” does not have a legal definition. And yes, it has been a great pick for David Gardner… even with the recent dip, it’s up about 500% from April of 2016.

And this one, we’d imagine, could be a stock that really suffers during the coronavirus “Great Cessation” — Match Group owns that eponymous Match.com service as well as the much more important Tinder app and a few other brands in the dating space, and dating platforms are one of the purest and most dramatic examples of the power of the “network effect,” so they should do very well in general as they grow (everyone wants to be on the dating service that has the most possible matches)… but nobody is going out on dates right now, so it would not be surprising if membership and usage of their services tails off for a few months until we’re all able to be out smooching strangers again. They are, of course, responding to coronavirus with video chat options and other ways to meet up, and their membership might be stable if folks decide to keep their dating profile active even if they don’t use it for a few months, but it’s unlikely to be a particularly strong period of time for the company.

Which, of course, is why the stock dipped almost 50% from peak to trough during the first wave of the coronavirus panic. The price bounced back pretty quickly to reclaim some of those gains, but the shares are still below where they spent most of 2019. They are also in the process of fully separating from their owner IAC/Interactive (IAC), a process that might be delayed a bit but is still expected to finish up in the first quarter, so there may be volatility as that spinoff gets completed — though my guess would be that Match will be more stable than its former parent, since I’d say IAC’s other businesses are lower-quality and more challenged than MTCH and they’re looking for new investments.

Match did preannounce that their earnings will be at the low end of the range they had expected in the first quarter, but not disastrous, so I’m sure everyone will be watching closely to see what they say about the second quarter when they report (the next earnings release date for them should be May 8, so you’ve got a few weeks to wait for more news). They did note that the coronavirus tail-off in usage and new signups was most evident among their customers over age 30, which makes sense given the widely-angsted stories about younger people being slower to accept social distancing rules, but that could certainly change as the COVID-19 impact drags on.

I expect Match to own the dominant dating platforms for a long time, it’s hard to imagine anyone really taking market share and they’ve continued to buy up smaller startups, so it’s possible that this is a bargain buying opportunity… but I haven’t ever owned the shares or tried their services, so you can take that sentiment with a grain of salt.

At $67 or so, they’re trading at about 32X trailing earnings, which is clearly a steep valuation for a company whose earnings will probably be pretty close to flat, at best, in 2020… but analysts do see earnings growing pretty rapidly again starting next year, with the 2022 forecasts implying an earnings growth rate of about 15% a year from 2019-2022, so somewhere in the $65-70 neighborhood is probably roughly the most I could stomach spending on an established growth stock like Match (that would be a Price/Earnings/Growth ratio of about 2). It’s not an easy buy, but you can certainly make the case given their market-leading position and the high margins enjoyed by a software company with a strong network effect.

That’s just my thinking on a few recent Motley Fool teaser pitches, though, and when it comes to your money it’s obviously your thinking that really matters — so whaddya think? Have any favorites among those “FAZERT” cloud stocks from the Fool, other stocks in the space that you like, or an opinion about the “recent” Match IPO and its potential? Let us know with a comment below.

Disclosure: of the companies mentioned above, I own shares of and/or call options on Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, Roku, Teladoc, and Fastly. I will not trade in any covered stock for at least three days, per Stock Gumshoe’s trading rules.

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

36 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
maclin
Irregular
April 13, 2020 1:33 pm

Travis, I would like to start a new subject if I may? Have you looked at Casey
Research’s , Teeka Tiwari, pitch on crypto currency ( he calls “Tech Royalty).
I Would like your take ! Maclin

Add a Topic
753
Add a Topic
4280
👍 40
chaszz
Member
chaszz
April 13, 2020 3:19 pm
Reply to  maclin

I have never seen Casey recommend anything that didn’t go down, although admittedly I haven’t followed him a whole lot. But he seems to me to be all he-man, machete-wielding path-breaking outsider contrarian tough guy, with very little real original insight to back it up.

Add a Topic
753
👍 28
Carbon Bigfootnsume..
Guest
Carbon Bigfootnsume..
April 13, 2020 4:28 pm
Reply to  chaszz

Diamond Fields in the 80s Casey’s big winner 59,000%. I made a tidy sum.

Chuck P
Guest
Chuck P
April 13, 2020 1:56 pm

I have been a subscriber now for 3 years to Motley Fools stock advisor. I got the pitch to join their cloud disruptors subscription for the $2,000 and I took a “Rain Check”. Not going to spend that kind of money for these assclowns. Their letter has no “Deep Research” and is very weak on the numbers and forecasts. Its filled with alot of mumbo jumbo that they have gotten from other sites and very little of any true “Meat & Potatoes”. I won’t be renewing with them. They remind me of the elixir salesman who sells the product out of the trunk of his car.

Add a Topic
477
Add a Topic
10671
inve5tor
Irregular
inve5tor
April 13, 2020 2:30 pm

I’ve been a subscriber to Rule Breakers for 3 years, only because they offered a $50 per year deal. That subscription ran out at the first of the year and I had no intention of re-upping, especially at full price, but they offered another two years at the same price so I went ahead and signed back up. They did turn me on to Trade Desk so I have to give them credit for that. One thing you can count on is being invited to other portfolios every couple of weeks or so. I’m not going to sign on to any of these other high price offerings they push but they usually will try to whet your appetite with at least one name. Supposedly, Tom Gardner’s favorite cloud stock is Appian, and yes it was also teased as one of their FAZER stocks, too.

As for Match, it may be a current Rule Breakers recommendation, but it’s not listed currently as one of their best buys today. Those are DOCU, QDEL, TWLO, TTD, SE, FSLY, and ETSY.

Add a Topic
421
Add a Topic
4914
👍 45
spaceguy
April 14, 2020 10:11 am
Reply to  inve5tor

I had a subscription to the same many years ago, and did okay with some of the suggested picks. I then moved over to the Stock Advisor subscription, thinking I would let them trim down the entirety of the market to a few good suggestions I could then pick from, but have been really disappointed at their suggestions. It seems like when the stocks are finally suggested, they have already made a long run up. And they do seem to be just recycling a lot of the same picks. Maybe they have moved on from their investor first approach of the 90’s to a make money through marketing and subscriptions approach.

Add a Topic
477
👍 5
kitkat73
Member
kitkat73
November 8, 2020 3:18 pm
Reply to  spaceguy

I have the exact same observation. I also really dislike the lack of price guidelines. There gets to be a point where Tesla and Zoom cease to be good buys although the companies are still quite sound. They tend to make it appear that any entry to ownership is good, nevermind the share price. They will also ride a failing stock all the way down before they finally issue a sell. I also take issue with the way that subscribers will pile onto somebody’s comment on the discussion boards if someone voices displeasure over a pick’s performance. They don’t bat 1000%, but act like they do. Arista is a good example. Someday they may have their place in the sun, but it won’t be 2020, and probably not 2021 either. There’s also the recycled picks. It appears that if they don’t have a new stock to recommend, they’ll rehash something like The Trade Desk. I would much rather read research on an unfamiliar company, with the conclusion that they aren’t quite convinced enough yet to issue a buy for it.

👍 28
Matt
Matt
April 13, 2020 2:36 pm

Thank you Travis, I find your articles to be spot on. This morning I just added to my positions in Fastly and Appian. Hoping the fools are right, no insights. I am baffled by the hype on Zoom ?? There are plenty of face to face chat apps.

chaszz
Member
chaszz
April 13, 2020 3:10 pm

I had the opportunaity recently to do some research on Teledoc, as a patient. I had two doctor televisits with my orthopedist, who is an employee in a very large doctors’ group with over half a million patients and 75 locations in the northern suburbs of NY City. Let me say first that I would not touch the bureaucracy of this group with a ten-foot pole, except that the doctors are good and all my specialists are on one computer system so they all see everything about me, a boon for a senior. Otherwise their phone system is a disaster and other bureaucratic kinks are evident everywhere. Maybe Teledoc is not capable of scaling up to a practice this big, because the app was merde, to use a French word that may pass muster here. The first time nobody could get it to work, so we made an appointment for that afternoon, which did work. The second time, it did not even pretend to start working, so we had an old-fashioned phone call.
In the software industry, the word for scaling up to larger usage loads is robust, and Teledoc was not nearly robust, more like on life support.

Also, the integration of Teledoc into the practice’s own in-house management software system was amateurish. Don’t know who did that work, presumably they shared it.

I’d assume there are competitors. Maybe they have spent more time building more robust software and hardware systems for these ever-expanding doctors’ groups. I’ve done well with TDOC, but will be watching closely to see if it starts losing ground to a competitor, and then will dump it faster than a software screen can crash.

Add a Topic
6215
👍 28
👍 21775
quincy adams
Guest
quincy adams
April 13, 2020 3:30 pm

I, too am in the middle of a 3-year “best deal” Stock Advisor subscription and so far, have noticed that many of their “hot” recommendations are joined with a common thread…they don’t currently make a profit and have little chance of doing so in the next 12 months. To justify the cost of my subscription, I took a flier on the resurrection of Blackberry (BB) they touted. I sold it a short time later with minimal loss and after checking today’s price, a buy-and-hold on that would be down over 60%. While it’s an engaging service, I feel that I might do just as well getting advice from any of my neighbors passing by while walking our dogs.

Add a Topic
477
Add a Topic
5866
Nathan
Nathan
April 13, 2020 7:28 pm
Reply to  quincy adams

I agree…I joined and recently unsubscribed 2 weeks later…most of these new picks are common knowledge and are already the next big thing , I haven’t seen them show a stock under $10 that’s going to go to $100 nd beyond.

👍 22
vivian lewis
April 13, 2020 4:41 pm

there is a real security issue with zoom because its meetings are now often being interrupted by people showing sex acts and dirty pictures, not what businesses and educators will put up with. another risk is that it uses a lot of linkages going via China because it has run into so much new demand.

Add a Topic
108
👍 21775
backoffice
Irregular
April 13, 2020 6:45 pm

most of their hype is on past deals , not much going on in the here and now and also a lot of re-plays on stocks they’ve made a killing in.

👍 450
atyson
atyson
April 14, 2020 5:24 am

Match Group and IAC/InterActiveCorp were the subject of a short attack by Kerrisdale on 13th Feb,2020 “two companies trying to break apart before an FTC lawsuit that alleges a disturbing level of civil fraud and a parallel DOJ criminal investigation leads to the market dumping them both.”

👍 15
👍 21775
John
Member
John
April 14, 2020 7:29 pm

https://www.kerrisdalecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Match-Group-MTCH-and-InterActiveCorp-IAC.pdf

The claim is that Match exploited messages from fake accounts to encourage users to sign up for the paid service.

Mario
Mario
April 14, 2020 5:30 am

I keep hearing about this SEA company so I am checking with my friends in Asia (1st time I heard about SEA was from Stansberry at the end of 2019). I think before buying Fastly I will do a comparison with Cloudfare to see how they are growing customers that pay >$100,000 YoY

Add a Topic
49
julian_satran
Member
April 14, 2020 5:54 am

I owned for a while TDOC (until the management scandal). I was doubtful of their value add and never looked back. I witnessed recently that all health-care providers where I live (in Israel) switched on their “telemedicine” services without too much fuss. They don’t have yet tele-sensing for things like EEG and ECG but some Emergency Help services have them for years as a subscription service. I don’t see a bright future for a TDOC except for geographies where there are no well-established health care providers.

Add a Topic
6215
Add a Topic
258
👍 65
samwiebaux
Guest
samwiebaux
April 14, 2020 8:16 pm

I told my broker at Wells Blankety Blanko to dump 100,000 Grand into AMAZON at 87 bucks a share in 2008 (or so) but the broker was miles away and I had SITUATIONS at the time and the KKKrooks failed to do so!

So, what would that be worth today if it HAD BEEN DONE as the IDIOT had been ADVISED to do???

Kinda hurts me to CONTEMPLATE that one!

samwiebaux
Guest
samwiebaux
April 14, 2020 10:38 pm

Is FOOL the same as IMBECILE, or IDIOT, or ANY NUMBER of LESS PRODUCTIVE terms that I am beginning to think this bunch of mushy old BANANAS emulate while sit back with their cheap scotch while they ROBBED ME OF MY EARTHLY GAINS and called it STOCK (SOCK?) ADVISOR, OR FOOL TAKERS, aptly named, as I CERTAINLY FEEL THE FOOL!

I PAID MONEY FOR THEIR ADVICE? WHILE, at the same time, I FEEL the GumShoe is far more erudite and capable of leading a gaggle of NEVER RICH OLD FOOLS on a STOCK SEARCH with which to finance ONE LAST LAMBORGHINI!

DECIDEDLY ORANGE!

timcoahran
Irregular
April 15, 2020 5:23 am
Reply to  samwiebaux

Orange?

👍 468
dbonweb
June 20, 2020 10:09 am
Reply to  timcoahran

Yeah, ORANGE???

👍 80
Michael
Michael
April 15, 2020 2:29 am

i bailed on MF six years ago after getting sucked into MF One — access to everything they publish. I was enlightened by the stark similarity in each advisory. They clearly have an easy to follow narrative template that their Brown University interns use. Became obvious the Next Big Thing multi-baggers were getting cranked out by these 20 yr old seasoned market veterans. Caveat: i’m picking on Brown because it’s one of the Gardner’s alma maters.

👍 4
Robert LaNicca
Member
April 16, 2020 4:15 pm

Travis, not related to the Motely Fool review (I don’t think) but have you looked into this 5G pitch?
https://secure.bonnerandpartners.com/?cid=MKT405688&eid=MKT413821&src=Taboola&assetId=AST117816&page=2
from Jeff Brown?

Add a Topic
6265
Add a Topic
5212
Janice McAllister
Member
Janice McAllister
April 20, 2020 12:17 pm
Reply to  Robert LaNicca

I am interested in what they are recommending also. I hate teasers like that!

Add a Topic
6265
👍 21775
samwiebaux
Guest
samwiebaux
April 19, 2020 6:17 pm

AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED, THE FATUOUS MOTLEYEST FooLS are those who are STUPID ENOUGH TO BUY THEIR so called INVESTMENT GUIDES!

I HAVE BEEN IN A SHORT TIME AND THEY SCREAM SELL this stock, ONLY WHEN IT SHOOTS UP THE NEXT FEW DAYS! ME THINKS THESE GOONS BUY ON THE DIPS CREATED BY THOSE OF US WHO ARE DUMB ENOUGH TO FOOL OW THEIR INSANE ADVISE!

I NOW KNOW WHY THESE GOOF BALL FOOLS GET RICH WHILE I STRUGGLE TO BREAK EVEN!

“PLEASE SHOOT ME IF I AM EVER A “MotleyENOUGHfooL” to EVER heed their advise again!

Bill
April 20, 2020 12:25 pm

Investing outlook.com is teasing Bill Shaw as follows “ “Events happening around the world are about to come together at just the right time to create a perfect storm, causing some of the world’s biggest investors to dump cash and stocks – and pile into this long-hated asset.
In fact, it’s already begun.” What would that be?

Add a Topic
5797
charlie1030
Member
April 20, 2020 1:03 pm

I don’t like Tom’s picks for the most part as I have consistently lost on his recommendations, but I do like David’s ZM, ZNGA, JD, ROKU. For me, Stock Advisor has more than covered it’s annual cost.

Add a Topic
8325
Add a Topic
5376
Add a Topic
6372
👍 187
charlie1030
Member
April 20, 2020 1:08 pm

A possible answer to Bill’s question is tomorrow’s Motley Fool presentation on a new service dealing with real estate.

Add a Topic
329
Add a Topic
409
👍 187
jblache
Member
jblache
May 15, 2020 1:16 pm

Made the mistake of doing the Fool’s Stock Advisor. A lot of push to purchase the various “stock portfolios”. Seems their focus has is up selling stock portfolios once you purchase the basic stock advisor. It is not all bad as there is some good information. Will definitely not renew with Motley. Now wishing I signed up with Stock Gumshoe for obtaining the “Real” information. Travis, you always seem to be spot on! Thank you!

Add a Topic
477
Add a Topic
1881

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x