Become a Member

What the heck is “NanoCrystal Electricity?” Will it “Magically Power Everything” and “pay out 78 times your money?”

Checking out the latest wireless electricity teaser from Michael Robinson's Nova-X Report

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, January 17, 2018

Michael Robinson this week is pitching his Nova-X Report with a promise that “we’re about to witness one of the most massive rollouts in history” as a new “magic electricity” ends the days of wires and plugs and dead batteries and makes us all filthy, stinkin’ rich.

So what the heck is he talking about? The promise is large and glorious, and designed, of course, to get you to hurry up and subscribe to Nova-X Report (which is his “entry level” report, $39/year currently) … and that promise incites daydreaming, with thoughts of cars that charge wirelessly, without big bulky high-voltage plugs… blenders that make you margaritas on the beach… coffeemakers that work inside your car.

That’s all in the service of picturing a world in which you own (a piece of) the core technology that makes wireless charging possible… which feels glorious and exciting. So let’s sample a few clues from the ad and see if we can name this stock for you, shall we? Here’s some of Robinson’s pitch:

“Now is the time to take this new energy VERY SERIOUSLY.

“As we speak, this tiny Silicon Valley firm is rushing to get their NanoCrystal Electricity technology fully adopted.

“They already have the three biggest multi-national manufacturer of electronics and chips on notice…

“Including Dialog Semiconductor, which has ponied up $25 million as a partner.

“If that isn’t a promise that this is going to happen any day now, nothing is.

“But it gets even more exciting.

“The company just announced they are currently working on integrating their remarkable technology with 56 other tech firms.

“This is just the beginning of a massive roll-out.”

Sounds pretty exciting… and with the Consumer Electronics Show getting lots of headlines, we can all imagine the cool new things that could be powered by wireless electricity. More clues?

“This tiny firm is about to have a sales bonanza!

“I added up the cash major industries are targeting for NanoCrystal Electricity. This includes electronic devices, electric cars, medical, military, and retail.

“I then estimated that this company locks-in a minimum of 20% of it all…

“For over $5 billion in revenue potential over the next couple years.

“Since this company is only three years old with only $4 million in sales so far, that translates into a 125,091% increase in revenues…”

That’s hooey, of course — anyone who starts out with a massive number for sales in a major industry and then says, “if this tiny company takes ‘just’ 20% of that market, the numbers will be astronomical!” is just using shock-and-awe math. Taking even 1% of a giant industry with a new technology is a gargantuan accomplishment, so take that with a huge grain of salt.

But, of course, “downplay” isn’t in Robinson’s vocabulary:

“We know they’re the leader in a revolutionary new technology…

“They should trade at a giant premium…

“They should have high operating margins (own the IP, outsources the heavy lifting)…

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“Reasonably, half the company profits should drop into the stock price…

“Meaning this stock could pay out 78 times your money.

“And not over the next decade – over the next two to three years.”

So that’s the bold, headline promise: $1,000 to $78,000 in three years. Something to keep track of when we come back and look at this teaser in the future.

Why is all of this supposed to be happening now? What’s the urgency? Robinson says there’s an imminent catalyst:

“A green light on their NanoCrystal Electricity is expected any day now from the FCC.”

OK, so I’ll spare you my look at all the rest of the clues… because I need to jump in here and say that’s a little disingenuous. This ad just started running (as far as we can tell, at least) this week… and the ad is dated “January 2018” … but Energous (WATT) actually got their first FCC approval for an over-the-air transmitter at the end of December.

So yes, the Thinkolator identified that Robinson here is touting Energous (WATT), the wireless charging startup that’s been the subject of wildly overpromising hype-filled newsletter ads since it showed off its first prototype “over the air” charging system at the Consumer Electronics Show three years ago.

And there’s a reason for the excitement, of course — by all accounts, the technology is real, and consumers really do want to be able to charge their devices without plugging them in. After those two basic realities are covered, though, the actual investment prospect and product development timelines become radically more complicated.

Partly that’s because the company has a well-documented history over overpromising on its development timeline… and pundits and newsletters have loaded up on that overpromising, magnifying the impact on the stock price. The last time I had anything to do with Energous stock I was short the shares for a little while in the Summer of 2016, when a couple newsletters were loudly promising that Apple was on the verge of announcing that they would use Energous’ WattUp wireless charging in the iPhone 7 (which was, of course, a patently ridiculous claim).

Now, of course, the story has changed a little bit, because Energous has gotten perhaps the first really good news they’ve had since they made the partnership deal with Dialog semiconductor back in 2016 and added to it last Summer. They announced in late December that the FCC has certified its first “over the air” charging transmitter. Here’s part of that press release:

“The company’s WattUp Mid Field transmitter can deliver power via radio frequency (RF) energy to WattUp-enabled electronic devices at a distance of up to three feet. As the only technology that can do both contact-based and non-contact-based wireless charging, as well as charge multiple devices at once, WattUp is highly scalable and automatically charges devices, as needed, until they are topped off. While older charging technologies allow for only contact-based charging, Energous is the only company to achieve Wireless Charging 2.0 to-date, which is the ability to charge devices both at contact (including fast charging large battery devices such as smartphones and tablets), as well as power-at-a-distance. Similar to WiFi, the WattUp ecosystem ensures interoperability between receivers and transmitters, regardless of the manufacturer, making the entire ecosystem flexible and accessible for consumers and manufacturing partners….

“This represents the first time FCC equipment certification has been awarded to any device that charges wirelessly at a distance, and operates under Part 18 of the FCC’s rules. The FCC’s Part 18 rules permit higher-power operations than are permitted under the Part 15 rules that have been used to approve other at a distance charging devices.”

I haven’t seen what Energous was presenting at the CES this year, but they were reportedly there (and the CEO got some press, including this video interview) and they have talked up the release of the first WattUp-enabled products, including some new hearing aids and Myant’s SKIIN smart clothing line… both of those are still using the existing “near field” charger, which is essentially a contact charger that requires you to be within a centimeter or so of the charger, much like the current Qi standard chargers (such as Apple has adopted for their first iPhones that use wireless charging, or for the Apple Watch), but the promise is that although these are contact chargers, they use the same technology as Energous’ Mid Field and eventual Far Field transmitters and will be able to receive power from those future transmitters as well. So your $80 smart underwear will be backward-compatible.

The current forecast for availability of those distance transmitters is “late this year, early in 2019,” according to the CEO in that interview, and they say they’re “more comfortable” with those projections now that the chips have been produced and they have some over-the-air certification. I’m probably a little too cynical about Energous, given the several waves of massive hype I’ve seen from and about the company… I love the idea of “charging at a distance,” and Energous certainly gets most of the press in that space (though there are other technologies, including Powercast, which also uses RF power transmission, and Ossia’s Cota), but clearly there are technical or consumer challenges or this fantastical stuff we’ve been hearing about for years would be everywhere by now.

What are the analysts expecting? Well, some of them have probably been burned before, too, from the years of “a product is right around the corner” talk, but Oppenheimer’s analyst reportedly has an estimate for $3.9 million in revenue for 2018 and “material” growth in 2019, with a “bull case scenario” of maybe generating close to $400 million in revenue by 2021. That’s a pretty different scenario than Michael Robinson’s, both envision “20% market share” but Robinson calls it a $25 billion market (with $5 billion in revenue for Energous) and the Oppenheimer analyst apparently foresees a $2 billion market (with $400 million in revenue for Energous).

On the flip side, of course, there’s also still a lot of pessimism from the short sellers — Andrew Left, in particular, has been vocal in his criticism of Energous, but there are others as well… though the FCC approval may well have generated a “short squeeze” a couple weeks ago (short data that I see is usually pretty old, shortsqueeze.com says about a third of the stock is still sold short).

I think Energous’s WattUp is still a possible technology advance in search of a breakthrough product. Rosy scenarios for WattUp require that it get some kind of critical mass building, which very likely means that at least one high-profile and high-volume product is needed, and I have no insight into what product that might be or when it might happen. I expect we’ll probably see Apple rumors for WATT again this year, too, though I think anyone expecting Apple to be the first adopter of WattUp is likely to be disappointed. Apple hasn’t been much of a risk-taker on that front, they tend to prefer to perfect proven and established technologies.

The good thing is that they are very small, with a market cap of $400 million or so, so even though their finances are rickety and they keep selling equity every time they have good news that drives the shares up (as most cash-burning companies do, wisely), and even though the insiders are steady sellers (as is typical of tech startups, where stock is a major part of compensation), there’s almost always an optimistic scenario lurking under the surface if you’re willing to take the chance on the technology and the management team.

WATT is not particularly appealing to me, and I think Michael Robinson is way out in left field with his projections in this ad, since the meaningful technology won’t even be available for purchase within a year, let alone taking 20% of the market in three years (and is a long way away from being ready for high-power applications like car charging… with even cell phones arguably being a little bit of a stretch at this point), but stock speculators are hopeful and optimistic folks… maybe this one will work out.

And Robinson throws a few extra “bonus” recommendations on the pile that are secondary plays on the huge gains he sees for Energous and for wireless charging in general, including some chipmakers and such, so he’s very likely also recommending Dialog Semiconductor (DLG in Eurpe, DLGNF OTC in the US), which fell 30% in the past month on bad news about Apple orders, and perhaps Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM), to whom they’ve also been linked in the past… WATT will not have a material impact on either of those companies’ income statements over the next year, though there is potential that Dialog will eventually get a boost, as the chip manufacturer, if Energous actually builds a very large business someday.

Sound like your cuppa tea? Excited about the possibilities? Exhausted by the hype? Let us know with a comment below.

Disclosure: I own shares of Apple, but am not invested in any of the other companies mentioned above. I will not trade in any covered stock for at least three days, per Stock Gumshoe’s trading rules.

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

280 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Smater Than You
Guest
Smater Than You
February 24, 2018 7:39 am

You all talk too much! If it can’t be communicated in a paragraph or two, it’s BS
Start off with explaining technically the giant leap from where we are today to magically powering high voltage, high current devices through the air. Then, let’s hear about the huge health threat that needs to be evaluated and approved.

Add a Topic
571
brett
Guest
brett
February 26, 2018 1:41 am

stop the silly things about harm from radio waves. while short waves like gamma rays and x-rays will harm you, radio waves are longer then your body disruption of DNA is nearly impossible. crystal power has been around for a while; you can probably still get crystal radio kits where you can listen to the radio with no battery. Heck, I can even wire up a battery charger today just on radio waves that are everywhere. Don’t bother buying this stock though, you can’t make a profit on electricity without wires, because if you do not pay its impossible to turn off the power to any user without turning it off for everyone.

Add a Topic
899
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Joe Smith
Guest
Joe Smith
February 28, 2018 9:07 pm

This more than likely will use energy transmitted by microwaves, a very dangerous proposition !!! indeed !!! you microwave oven operates around 2.2 or 2.4 gigahertz, that’s also the resonant frequency of a molecule of water, which is why food heats up in a microwave oven !! its also very inefficient for distance transmission!! Somebody is just trying to make money (in stock market) with this idea !!

Add a Topic
540
Add a Topic
5971
Charles SWVA
Guest
Charles SWVA
March 3, 2018 8:45 am

.
Never mind the money blather, is the technology real and will it actually become available in out lifetime. Should Rossi and his E-Cat dread this?

Albert Einstein
Guest
Albert Einstein
March 5, 2018 3:32 pm

Proving once again that there’s a sucker born every minute….

You folks need to get a course in fundamental physics. This is bogus.

Buzz
Guest
Buzz
March 5, 2018 9:34 pm

It CAN work but there’s a couple of problems. Low frequency inductive charging requires HUGE amounts of power at low efficiency. Some microwave power transmission solutions show promise at the risk of rendering you childless (which, as a father of two girls may not be a bad thing!) My new 2018 Honda Accord Touring has an awesome cordless charger but to use Android Auto, you have to plug in a cord, which seems counter intuitive……. I design RF products and feel that this technology can work eventually. I just think we’re a decade away

Ronald Bax
Guest
Ronald Bax
March 21, 2018 8:34 pm
Reply to  Buzz

If you read the studies, the sperm count in industrialized nations has dropped 52% in the past 39 years. The causes weren’t mentioned. That makes tau = 32 years. If you continue that exponential decay, the sperm count will have decreased 90% in another 128 years. Just in case it’s E or B-Field related, I’m going to start selling mu metal underpants. While mu metal can also shield your credit cards – that stuff – as sharp as a razor blade – will be right next to your………….

Ronald Bax
Guest
Ronald Bax
March 21, 2018 8:47 pm
Reply to  Buzz

As an electronics engineer who spent his last 30 years working for some of those very same Silicon Valley companies – I listened to the presentation with a critical ear, in case I might have missed something. It has to be one of the longest-winded Shaggy Dog stories I’ve ever heard. Sorry if I miss the opportunity.

Ronald Pichler
Guest
Ronald Pichler
March 6, 2018 2:08 pm

Crystal radios work. Tesla had a wireless power system which was not efficient. More distance = Power loss (less efficent). Charging batteries, OK- Turning a motor, nope!

Jimbo
Guest
Jimbo
March 8, 2018 2:44 pm

Wow!….. So some day we can have hundreds of amps whipping thru the air enroute to their destination? Mabye the military is interested!

Ronald Eadie
Guest
Ronald Eadie
March 9, 2018 11:36 pm

why is it that these company gurus get to say all these good things about upcoming stock prices that never exist just to sell their product you buy a product the stocks are not there and you left with a bill because the company tells you where not Traders we just give out information is that false advertisement of what Michael Robinson is pro claiming all this good stuff what a joke

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
1251
Libby Murray
Guest
Libby Murray
March 10, 2018 2:37 pm

What about NANO?

kjseibert
kjseibert
March 13, 2018 5:33 pm

Its really quite interesting that many of the naysayers are experts on everything except the company they are trashing. Energous has a deal with Dialog. Lots of smart people at Dialog including engineers. Dialog is a billion dollar company. And yet, so many without even doing one shred of DD slam the technology as impossible why? Because it has never been done before? Because they are smarter than the CEO and everyone on the board of Dialog Semiconductor?

Yes there will be energy loss. But considering the ridiculously low cost to charge your smartphone it seems probable that the lost energy might be worth the convenience. A quick Google search will tell you “If you fully drained and recharged your phone everyday, then over the course of a year you would have to feed it about 2,000 watt hours, or 2kWh. At an average price of 12 cents that means that your phone uses about one quarter’s worth of electricity per year.” Personally, I’d pay 100.00 extra in electricity a year to never have to plug my phone in and have it always be charging when I am in the room.

Now to the dangers. Energous’ tech creates a safe charging environment by creating a “pocket” of energy and by having the transmitter shut off if it senses a living object in the path of the charge. Energous CEO has claimed in the past that if cell phones are safe then their technology is “an order of magnitude safer”.

Energous tech is the only technology to have obtained both FCC part 15 and part 18 approval. The FCC is in the business of determining what is safe and what is not so I tend to believe them over pretty much everyone here. The FCC chair Ajit Pai heralded Energous’ FCC Part 18 approval on Twitter…”The @FCC has approved the first-ever wireless, “power-at-a-distance” charging technology. @Energous’ #WattUp could allow multiple devices to be recharged up to 3 feet away, regardless of manufacturer. https://ir.energous.com/press-releases/detail/596/energous-receives-industry-first-fcc-certification-for … cc @MartyMobile”. Note how he tags Marty Cooper, father of the cell phone who sits on Energous’ board. Again, kinda smart people here.

Now, is it guaratneed? No. Is it worth some money from my speculative tech bucket? Yes. In fact, my personal cost average is 11.00. Not claiming to be a genius, just trying to make money. Which I am with Energous.

Add a Topic
372
👍 13
Gary
Guest
Gary
March 14, 2018 5:20 am

It will kill everyone !…It will fry your eyes like eggs !

Add a Topic
4656
Add a Topic
5470
Linkerj
Guest
Linkerj
March 14, 2018 11:03 am

Thanks for you realistic thoughts so many investors chasing dreams and i’m Not going to be one of them

Well written article thanks

Add a Topic
4656
Magic Dragon
Guest
Magic Dragon
March 14, 2018 2:19 pm

With all these microwaves going everywhere in the world, how can the companies who create them determine who pays for the electricity? If I drive my electric car across the country, how can the microwaves distinguish between my car and the millions of other cars on the highway? Billing will be a nightmare.

backoffice
Irregular
March 18, 2018 4:25 pm

Imagine that ice cold beer in a tent, I can almost see the foam. Don’t spill any on grandma’s paisley shawl. Buy some shares you don’t want to be a jabber now do ya?

👍 450
Jose A. Colon
Guest
Jose A. Colon
March 22, 2018 9:37 pm
Reply to  backoffice

I notice,I keep getting the same,discussion about this nanocrystal power.is there any information about the small company,that has the patent for this new energy ??

👍 21795
Johnny Nosebeter
Guest
Johnny Nosebeter
March 25, 2018 12:55 pm

NICE PUMP AND DUMP, SEE YA!

david mills
Guest
david mills
March 27, 2018 3:12 pm

first I like to thank you for the information on this company, and from the little information I have been able to find on my own and from Paul Mampilly I think I will take a moderate chance on this company.

Add a Topic
2799
James Hill
Guest
James Hill
March 28, 2018 7:07 pm
Reply to  david mills

Better look at the insider trading first!
The company has also made no revenue…its a scam. I almost bought stock until I read a finding alpha story that went in depth.

Add a Topic
5971
Wayne Schindler
Guest
Wayne Schindler
April 2, 2018 6:21 am

May take a Tad longer but it is the real deal. They have had this technology before Tesla figured this all out. We will able to power anything electric.

Robert
Guest
Robert
April 2, 2018 11:21 am

I have read a large number of comments made concerning the Nano Crystal Electricity so called possible hoax. You know I truly don’t know what to think!! When my grandparents were alive and I told them that one day I would by walking down the street while talking on the phone,… they would ask me if I was taking any drugs. If I also told them that l will one day have a computer in my home and making a paycheck as well as paying my bills without ever leaving the house,… they would say I was crazy. If I told them that my kids will be able to ride with me in my car and watch tv while the car provide directions to a friends home in another state,… they would have disowned me. So that being said, I can only say anything and everything is possible. We invest in the dreams of others and can only pray that whom ever dreams that we invest in becomes true.

R. Lain
Guest
R. Lain
April 8, 2018 11:05 am

I must say that it sounds very much like Tesla’s Broadcast Power. Hope they are paying the royalties to the Tesla family after the hard time given to the inventor.

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x