Become a Member

What’s the “Tiny Oil Producer” that “Just Made the Largest Discovery in 36 years in Oil-Rich Alberta”

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, August 28, 2017

Oil is getting clobbered as Hurricane Harvey continues to flood the Gulf Coast of Texas, so I thought we’d take a look at an oil teaser today — and this one seems to be a new newsletter, or at least a newly branded newsletter.

The teased pick is from Chuck de Castro, who I’ve written about many times as he has pitched his Penny Oil Speculator, often hinting at super-teensy little microcap oil explorers, but the ad is for a newsletter called Penny Oil Winners that he’s apparently running for Martin Weiss now at The Edelson Institute (which itself seems to be the nameplate now for all the scions of the “hard assets” newsletters that the late Larry Edelson put out for Weiss over the years).

So presumably this Penny Oil Winners, which is “on sale” at about $1,000 a year, will be similar to Penny Oil Speculator — from the language of the ad, it sounds like it’s the same newsletter, it has just changed publishers and names.

What, then, is this secret stock pick they’re using to tantalize us? Here’s a bit from Martin Weiss to introduce it:

“Last time we recommended a penny oil stock like the one we’re recommending now, investors following our buy-and-sell calls could have invested a meager $3,000 and made actual profits of $74,520. This time, our new pick could do even better.

“It’s a tiny penny oil producer that’s just made the largest discovery in 36 years in oil-rich Alberta, Canada.”

OK… so, not so sexy on a day when oil is falling by a couple dollars — but we’d like to be contrarian, right? So what other clues do we get about this little penny oil?

Weiss says the “street value” of the oil this company discovered is $23.7 billion… which is an odd term, it’s not like they’re drilling for heroin or making black-market deals for crude, but it does supply a hint because he says that $23.7 billion is 485X the market cap of the company they’re recommending.

And we have the power of math on our side, so that means the market cap is somewhere near $49 million.

What about other clues? Here’s more from Weiss:

“Right now, you can buy its shares for about 50¢ each. If their follow-up test wells confirm half or all of the $23.7 billion of oil — as we expect they will — those shares could easily explode to $5 or $10….

“Based on a recent study by a top independent petroleum engineering firm, this company’s deposit could hold as much as 485.5 million barrels of oil….

“…this is the highly-valued, light, sweet crude oil that’s easy to refine into gasoline and diesel. It sells at a premium to the more common, heavy, sour crude oil….”

So who is it? You can check out Weiss’ ad/article if you want to get more of the gist, but that’s enough clues for us — Thinkolator sez this is Ikkuma Resources (IKM in Canada, PRCYF OTC in the US), which last had its day in the sun back in 2014 when it was still called PanTerra Resources, before the collapse in oil prices in the second half of that year (which led right into a reverse split and a name change in the fall of 2014).

Ikkuma is indeed a perfect match for this — trading at about 50 cents (US), with a market cap of $49 million, and a “large light oil discovery” that they’ve been advancing this year that’s described in their recent press release here.

The more interesting thing is that Ikkuma has just made what they call a transformational acquisition to expand their business — they’re selling control of their infrastructure assets and using some of their cash and/or debt facility and some equity to buy (for about $34 million) a bunch of producing natural gas assets in the Central Alberta Foothills, in addition to adding some to the oil pools they’re trying to develop. The deal is explained in a press release here, but it looks like it will add to their debt but otherwise improve pretty much every metric otherwise… including more than doubling their cash flow per share.

The cash flow from those assets will be used, it appears, to develop their light oil discovery — so you get some exposure to both oil and natural gas, which is good or bad depending on where you think those prices are headed. That doesn’t mean the company will be worth $23 billion anytime soon, of course — the proven developed and producint reserves are currently valued, with a 10% discount rate, at $230 million (that’s on a pro forma basis, assuming the deal goes through and the projections about natural gas prices are accurate)… so the company is trading at a discount to that estimated value, but companies pretty much always trade at a discount to the value of their future production.

And that’s a nice base level of production, I guess, for a company that has ambitions of developing the much larger light oil discovery they’ve made in the Narraway area, in the Northern Alberta Cardium and Badheart formations. So the story is interesting and logical — a producing natural gas field that’s generating cash flow, with some potential for growth, and a place where they can reinvest that cash flow into developing a potentially large oil field. A nice, logical story doesn’t necessarily mean it’s going to be a winning investment, of course, and I haven’t looked into a lot of little junior oil players lately so I can’t say that I’m sure about whether this one is cheap or dear in comparison to its peers… there are probably a lot of inexpensive-looking oil stocks out there these days.

If you’d like to dig in and start judging for yourself, you can start with the company’s latest investor presentation here — it includes that “transformational” acquisition. I’m favorably inclined to this one, given the undeveloped light oil and the solid cash flow from their existing natural gas wells during a time when natural gas prices are not particularly robust, but that could just be because I haven’t looked at their competitors to see whether their economics also look reasonable under the current pricing pressure — maybe all these little cash-flowing juniors are looking better now that we’re all afraid of oil stocks, I don’t know.

That’s just my two cents after skimming through the company’s details for a little while, and I’m certainly not an expert on the oil and gas producers of Western Canada… perhaps you’ve something to add? Think these folks have a great discovery on their hands? Are they overvalued or undervalued? What are we (or Chuck de Castro) missing? Let us know with a comment below.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
radco3140
radco3140
August 28, 2017 7:42 pm

Rich
Fortunately or unfortunately, I followed Martin’s dad back in the late 60’s early 70’s when Martin used to use his dad as (correctly) calling the great depression I think as a stock broker. That being said, in my opinion Weiss is another “gloom and doom” guy that correctly called nine of the last three downturns in the market. For what that’s worth…. which is probably what you would get following any other gloom “and doomer”

Add a Topic
5155
Add a Topic
5971
👍 27
Caulker
Caulker
August 28, 2017 9:09 pm

Followed Weiss and assoc. for quite a while and only lost money

clauschris
Member
clauschris
August 29, 2017 5:21 am

IKM is in the same – interesting – category as another Alberta-based junior oil exploration company, International Frontier Resources (IFR), which has great expertise in fracking of oil. I don’t know if IKM has the same level of potential, but it could very well be.

Let me know your views of IKM.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
2771
Add a Topic
359
👍 9
Pat Counsil
Guest
Pat Counsil
August 31, 2017 1:51 am

Can someone please tell me your thoughts on IKM ( what do the initials stand for?). and IFR (International Frontier Resources) ? At or near Alberta Canada. Hot or not? Straight up Truth or Consequences! Thank You barrels and barrels of oil.

Add a Topic
2656
Add a Topic
1515
Add a Topic
359
George Hill
George Hill
August 31, 2017 10:51 am
Reply to  Pat Counsil

Hi Pat,
Ikkuma Resources Corporation. It’s surprising you didn’t find that in Travis’s report. There is a huge hype that Travis reported on with some guarded optimism. I looked at all I could find on the web. There is a very detailed company presentation. It looked solid and sensible enough for me to make a modest bet by buying some. We have mainly dividend stocks, very few speculative ones, and are not big experts.

A tipping point for me was that a director bought 104 k of it a few days ago. So far the hype has not caused a spike in the price. That is surprising – but note those spikes are often short-lived.

I didn’t buy IFR. It seems too spread out geographically for me to think it is an easy company to manage. Do you go to Google Finance website? They have a short description of each company’s activities, and relevant links. (Also useless links re what the stock did in the last two days.)

Remember the old rule: don’t bet more than you can afford to lose.
Good luck, George

Add a Topic
899
Add a Topic
5971
vonster
vonster
September 4, 2017 4:52 am

Hi Travis, I just wanted to say I love your analysis of everything you dig into, It’s reasoned and comprehensive, usually tagging all the bags on your way around the bases. The one you missed in this article, is the major hurdle this outfit has to get over, is the fact that they’re currently attempting to operate in Nanootchka Nutley’s Alberta, That’s my little commie name for the watermelon. (Someone who’s green on the outside, but all pinko on the inside) However, with Nanootchka, she’s certifiably, clinically, textbook INSANE! She’s chosen a ‘Piss It All To The Wall’ plan regarding oil exploration, right down to, and including attempting to bribe the producers of the oil sands into leaving the black gold in the ground in an attempt to halt the carbon footprint that she fears is kicking the lights out! Her ‘sky is falling, Chicken Little’ b.s. would cost this province and by extension, the country $150 BILLION over 15 years, while only cutting global carbon emissions by .038% Did you get that figure? That’s not a typo – ANY of it! LESS THAN HALF A FRIGGING PERCENT! Now if that isn’t living proof that she’s stark raving nuts, you can throw me out!

However, given that the stock is only trading for 50 cents, I can’t leave it on the table, so I’m gonna buy up a dirty big gob of ’em! Besides, Nanootchka’s going to be put to pasture for the next generation in the next election, less than a deuce down the road, and all the sensible parties are using their ‘Death To Nanootchka’s Carbon Tax’ as a platform plank!

So once again, thanks for letting us know.

Add a Topic
2656
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
Tanglesome
Guest
Tanglesome
October 17, 2017 12:47 pm
Reply to  vonster

If the company has to face her as a hurdle, then why is it a buy for you?

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x