Become a Member

Revealing “Greenland’s Gift” as teased by Penny Stock Millionaire

What is Alex Koyfman teasing as "The 30-Cent Stock That Could Return 682%"

Alex Koyfman: “Hidden away in the coldest regions of the North Atlantic, about 700 miles northeast of Newfoundland, lies a desolate, forbidding tundra.

“It’s more than three times the size of Texas, and yet only 56,000 people dare to live there — giving it the lowest population density of any nation.

“From the surface, this wide expanse of desolation doesn’t look like much.

“It certainly doesn’t look like the most strategically important piece of real estate on the planet.

“But that’s exactly what it is.

“You see, locked within a 278-square-mile section on the southern tip of the giant Arctic island known as Greenland is a unique group of minerals, concentrated unlike any other deposit on earth.”

Exciting, right? Ever since the natural resources markets collapsed with falling commodity prices we’ve seen a shortage of these kinds of “desolate terrain/Indiana Jones” teasers — and I admit that I kinda miss ’em.

So it’s nice to see that someone is again teasing us about a secret gift on the remote island of Greenland (which is now a semi-autonomous country, though low oil prices are keeping them tied pretty closely to their former colonial owner, Denmark), and one that’s going to make us stinkin’ rich. We don’t even have to jump on the roof of a speeding truck or snowshoe across the harsh and forbidding frozen mountains… what could go wrong, right?

The pitch is from Alex Koyfman for Penny Stock Millionaire, which will run you about $499/year if you’re inclined to subscribe (don’t do it just to learn the name of this company — I’ll tell you that in a moment, free) — he’s previously teased us about some biotech stocks for this letter, but today we’re looking at rare earth minerals — which were kinda like the story-driven “junior biotech” stocks of four or five years ago, when it seemed like any stock that could get pitched as an “end China’s rare earth metals monopoly” opportunity doubled or tripled.

And yes, there are a couple deposits of rare earths in Greenland (some are found alongside uranium, too, which has presented a challenge in the past), and those companies have been teased from time to time during the on-again, off-again periods of rare earth mania … so which one is being teased by Koyfman today?

Well, the basic pitch, as with most mining companies, is that the discrete land position they own is incredibly valuable because of what it might produce someday… here’s some more from the ad:

“They’re called Rare Earth Elements, or REEs for short. And this prized piece of land contains more than $273 billion worth.

“Without them, some of our most important modern technologies would not exist.

“In fact, they’re so crucial to modern circuitry that industry insiders came up with a nickname for REEs: “technology metals.”

“From hybrid car batteries to wind turbine motors to missile guidance systems…

“Metals such as cerium, promethium, europium, and many of the remaining 29 Rare Earth Elements are essential to all modern electronic devices…

“This chunk of land isn’t controlled by any nation. It’s controlled by a single company — and not some giant multi-billion dollar corporation with interests scattered all over the globe.

“This company is small… Tiny, in fact. Less than $25 million market capitalization as of today…

“Its stock, which trades at $0.30, is priced so low because the company is technically still in its development stage.”

Well, given the relatively small number of companies exploring in Greenland that’s actually enough clues… but let’s get just a wee bit more from the ad so we can be completely certain… apparently, this company is doing something besides just exploring for rare earth elements deposits:

“Just a few weeks ago, this company did something that nobody has ever managed to do on the island of Greenland…

“It actually produced a product — a key raw material used in the production of plastics, fiberglass, aluminum alloys for car bodies, and a multitude of other high-demand consumer products…

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“And it was some of the purest ever — the product of a unique, highly efficient yet chemical-free refinement process.

“Now it’s partnering with one of the biggest materials companies in the world — I bet you’ll recognize the name when you see it a bit later — to produce fiberglass from this material in huge quantities.”

They might actually have some revenue? That would be a novelty, indeed.

And he teases us that they’re really on the verge of something big happening in the very near future, just as soon as Greenland warms up enough for them to do more work this Summer…

“Right now, my brand-new recommendation is poised to make a triple-digit leap as early-stage limited production — like the kind I told you about at the beginning — moves to full-scale production….

“Up until several years ago, two other mining companies — Lynas Corporation and Arafura Resources — were also major contenders to threaten the Chinese Rare Earths monopoly.

“But after these companies barely survived the global downturn, the Chinese swooped in with emergency financing.

“The infusion of capital saved these companies’ hides, but it came at a price.

“When it was all over, these two companies — and their vast Rare Earth deposits — were in Chinese hands… leaving my brand-new recommendation all alone to challenge the Chinese.

“Once production ramps up in Western Greenland — which could happen this summer as the weather warms — this operation will remain securely at the top of the food chain by producing at least 50,000 tonnes of Rare Earth Elements and lithium annually.

“With an expected annual production of that magnitude, this $30 million outfit would have grossed a staggering $720 million — in last year’s market!

“But even if it was running at only quarter capacity, and even if costs ate up an almost unheard-of 90% of gross revenue (for REEs, 50% is closer to normal), the share price would still hit about $2.00.”

OK, so that’s getting a LOT more specific. We can feed all that into the Mighty, Mighty Thinkolator and get to our usual 100% level of certainty for a teaser answer: This is Hudson Resources (HUD on the Venture exchange in Canada, HUDRF OTC in the US). And if I had to guess, I’d say Koyfman recommended it to his subscribers on March 24 or 25, since that’s when the stock surged from 30 cents to 50 cents for a few days, it has come back to earth now a little bit and trades for about 44 cents as I type (those are Canadian cents, so HUDRF recently traded for about 36 cents in US$ terms).

Sound familiar? Yes, Hudson Resources has been teased by this publisher before — well before Alex Koyfman or his Penny Stock Millionaire exited, Brian Hicks teased the stock as the “Saudi Arabia of the Arctic” in 2009 when it was around C$0.60 and Ian Cooper teased it a year later as “Greenland’s Giant Killer” for his Pure Asset Trader when it was trading near a dollar (and moving wildly with all this attention).

And yes, the big picture story is pretty much the same for Hudson Resources as it was five years ago — still a big rare earth minerals deposit at the ends of the earth, still dependent more on investor sentiment about rare earths and the Chinese monopoly than on actual financial operations.

But there has been a bit of a twist… while for a few years from 2007-2011 or so they were REE-focused as they explored their Sarfartoq project (before that they were looking for diamonds) to define their neodymium (and other REE) resources, they switched their focus starting in 2012 or so to a non-rare earth minerals resource, their White Mountain anorthosite/calcium feldspar deposit that would apparently be much, much easier (and faster, and cheaper) to bring to production. You can see their most recent investor presentation here, it looks like this product is destined for use as a replacement for kaolin in fiberglass production and as a primary source of alumina.

The last rare earths/Sarfartoq press release from the company was more than two years ago, though they’ve likely been doing some quieter work on that project — since mid-2012 the attention has all been on the White Mountain project.

They have indeed tested their anorthosite product with a potential large customer, Owens Corning, and they were able to make E-glass with it (a form of fiberglass, apparently) so that was termed a success. Their current plan has them bringing on some major offtake agreements (pre-funding the project with customer commitments), getting financing for actual mine construction, and starting production probably late in 2016. It’s a fairly simple project, there’s no refining or leaching or anything yucky like that — they basically just smash the rocks and ship the crumbled bits to customers, and there’s a deepwater fjord right next to the deposit so the transportation should also be fairly simple.

Which is not to say that it’s guaranteed to be an easy start-up, easy to get offtake agreements, or easy to get financing… or that it will be profitable. I have no idea what the economics of aluminum or kaolin/fiberglass production are or what the pricing will be like.

They completed a preliminary economic assessment recently for the possible production of alumina from White Mountain, for that they give themselves a net present value of the project (aluminum alone, not the fiberglass ingredient production) of about $200 million. So that’s one possible number to build upon.

Secondarily, you could use the rough numbers for the anorthosite production and its ability to replace kaolin clay in e-glass/fiberglass — they share these numbers in their investor presentation (200,000 tonnes of anorthosite per year initially, rising to 500,000 tonnes in several years, and the fact that kaolin is priced at $85-200/ton), and get that the possible revenue from production could be anywhere from $17 million to $100 million. Presumably the costs would also be up there somewhere near the $115 million/ton that the alumina production would cost, or some substantial portion of that. Other than to say, “hmmm, production costs and shipping costs are going to be a big deal,” I don’t really know how specific you can get about assessing the value of the project… but there is at least some underlying potential economic viability there, with the first green flag to be waved probably being the fact that someone ends up, in the next few months if their projections are accurate, giving them the $100+ million in initial financing that they’ll need to build the mine.

Hudson is a tiny company, with a market cap of about C$35 million, and they have probably less than a million dollars in the bank so they’ll need to raise funds pretty soon — presumably they’d like to do that after they have good news to report that can boost the share price a bit (like financing, or an off-take agreement with a fiberglass manufacturer… or a zealous endorsement from a widely circulated investment newsletter). And, of course, if the world manages to create another “rare earths bubble” in the rare earth element stocks, as we’ve seen twice in the past decade, the stock could rise with that kind of enthusiasm even if their rare earths project is currently on the back burner.

With that, I’ll leave you to do your own thinking and research — let us know if Hudson appeals to you, or if you have other ideas in the sector that Gumshoe readers should be considering… just use the friendly little comment box below. Don’t worry, it won’t bite.

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
hendrixnuzzles
April 9, 2015 1:25 am

Thanks, Travis. Virgin resources await.
We should add Greenland and Iceland as new states.

👍 9968
TomCat
Member
April 9, 2015 11:54 am
Reply to  hendrixnuzzles

Greenland is made up of more glaziers and ice than Iceland. Their names should be reversed……Iceland has more forest and green than Greenland!

Fencer
Guest
Fencer
April 10, 2015 12:35 pm
Reply to  TomCat

When the Vikings were exploring for new lands, (a mini population explosion in their home country ) , they quickly found Iceland and started a colony. Greenland was another thing altogether being more hostile. I think it was Leif Erikson who, to encourage settlers, called it Greenland. The settlements didn’t succeed but Erikson apparently went on to explore Labrador and the North Eastern seaboard of the US.
He mentions luscious fruits, scented airs blowing, wonderful timber but surprisingly no rare earths – so I’d beware of this one!

Add a Topic
494
ginridge
Member
ginridge
April 11, 2015 2:57 pm
Reply to  TomCat

Glaziers??? Do they have an abundance of windows in Greenland? 🙂

👍 13
AJ
Member
AJ
April 9, 2015 9:18 am

Any connection to Greenland Mining and Metals???

theonlymaskman
Guest
theonlymaskman
April 9, 2015 10:38 am
Reply to  AJ

No, other than it is another development company in this space with their Kvanefjeld deposit in Greenland with rare earths, uranium and zinc.

Add a Topic
520
Add a Topic
560
modernrock
Irregular
April 9, 2015 9:29 am

This is an incorrect thinkolator.

👍 255
👍 21780
canonfodder
canonfodder
April 9, 2015 9:59 am
Reply to  modernrock

Your statement leaves us wondering if you got cut off or something while writing. Did you really mean to say that the Gumshoes choice of Hudson is wrong? Do you have a replacement company?

👍 82
👍 21780
Observer
Observer
April 13, 2015 2:04 pm

From one “in the know,” the Thinkolator is exactly right. Interesting to learn Hudson has been hyped for a number of years.

theonlymaskman
Guest
theonlymaskman
April 9, 2015 9:48 am

I would throw NioCorp Developments into the ring as a potential near term REE (niobium) producer from its Elk Creek, Nebraska deposit. The deposit is featured by the company as the only Niobium deposit under development in the US and the highest grade Niobium deposit in North America also containing Titanium and Scandium.

Add a Topic
4065
Add a Topic
4065
Add a Topic
5916
Rusty Brown in Canada
Member
Rusty Brown in Canada
April 9, 2015 9:55 am

Thanks for another excellent write up, Travis.
Re your aside about “Canadian cents” they now exist only in theory or in the form of little brown coins in the bottoms of old shoe boxes across the land.
We stopped making pennies here in February 2013, and now they are as rare as unicorns. I have a hoard going back to King George IV and one George V I got in change a few years back, but they are no longer spendable, apparently.
I mention this in case anyone wants fodder for a bar-room argument any time as to whether a country can eliminate the penny and still manage to carry on business somehow.
Greetings to all from rainy, windy Canada.

Add a Topic
3102
Add a Topic
282
Add a Topic
635
arch1
April 9, 2015 3:43 pm

You mean I should not have been using those old King George I pennies for target practice?

🙂 just kidding. I wish they would quit using them here,,,you often see them on streets and sidewalks with no one picking them up. At one time you could buy a cheap cigar for a
nickel but now its not worth a dime. 🙂

Add a Topic
964
👍 7797
noni
Member
noni
April 9, 2015 10:07 am

If it’s incorrect, why don’t you enlighten us?

👍 22
Michael in Michigan
Member
Michael in Michigan
April 9, 2015 11:21 am

Have not heard much about Hudson Resources but have been following Greenland Minerals and Energy for years watching their political and financial progress on the Kvanefjeld Rare Earth Project. They have recently made great strides in rediness for their rare earth project. Readers may want to take a look at them also.

Add a Topic
1280
Michael in Michigan
Member
Michael in Michigan
April 9, 2015 11:23 am

Sorry, I forgot to mention U.S. symbol for Greenland Minerals is GDLNF.

privateerwolf
Member
privateerwolf
April 9, 2015 11:38 am

People interested in rare earth metals might also be interested in Nuna Minerals that are listen on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange.

http://greenlandrareearth.com/latest-news/

http://greenlandrareearth.com/latest-news/

also read this pdf-file

http://www.goldletterint.com/documents/pdf/GREENLAND_mining_27Jan2015.pdf

I am from Denmark, but have only heard about Nuna Minerals and London Mining.
There is also great interest from China for various minerals from Greenland.
China Hong Kong based General Nice Development Limited should be involved in a project of iron ore to around 2 billion dollars that will also involve thousands of Chinese workers..

The question about mining rare earth metals is still largely unresolved as far as I know. Greenland is expected to achieve a share of 20% to 25% of the total market share for rare earth metals, but there is a massive debate about mining is concerning the prospect of massive pollution, specially about uranium.
Also the prospect that Greenland stand to gain very little from the projects is debated. The Chinese controlled London Mining were heavily involved in the negotiations. But half the profit from the production would be removed from Greenland, and London Mining also planned to use only Chinese labor, not subject to Danish/Greenland labor regulations. That would mean no work for workers in Greenland.

While the Home Rule of Greenland have full control over minerals, oil and gas-exploration still needs approval from Denmark.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
108
Add a Topic
108
👍 2
Tim Hunter
Member
Tim Hunter
April 9, 2015 11:48 am

Travis, I’m glad you mentioned Brian Hicks–because when that guy touts a stock, I automatically know to STAY AWAY!! He’s a pure charlatan in my book.

Add a Topic
5971
Wolfgang
Wolfgang
April 9, 2015 12:32 pm

Hudson Resources (HUDRF and HUD)published a feasibility report that comes up with a present value of $2.00 per share just for the feldspar (alumina) project . They will finish the road to a nearby deep harbor this year. They expect permitting in the next three months. That is what moved the stock from 27 cent Canadian to 54 cents . The low since then has been 44 cents Canadian.

Add a Topic
1280
Add a Topic
5971
koifish46
koifish46
April 9, 2015 4:09 pm

Greenland Minerals and energy was touted by Jeff Opdyke of The Sovereign Society back in Jan.2011. He called it “The Mining Coup of the Century” He claimed it could hand you as much as 1,443% gains by Jan.31st of that year. Of coarse it didn’t and when I call Jeff about it he said it didn’t pan out the way he expected. It’s what these so called experts do to sell their newsletters. It pays to do your own research. The internet is full of information for free.

Add a Topic
1586
👍 20
lysander72
Member
April 9, 2015 4:46 pm

Financing is a major concern in this market. I am comfortable waiting to see if the company can raise money and at what price, there will still be time to jump in after that.

👍 18
hendrixnuzzles
April 11, 2015 8:45 am

For believers in Global Warming…get ready for a tremendous boom in real estate REITS and development based on Greenland coastline development. Soon we will be able to invest in oceanfront condo developments and infrastructure plays in Greenland, to say nothing of golf courses and casinos. Can’t wait to see the promotional pictures with
blonde and redheaded Nordic golfers zipping along in golf carts past walruses and
sea lions frolicking near massive glaciers.

Add a Topic
409
Add a Topic
2512
👍 9968
chris
Member
chris
April 11, 2015 3:33 pm

i’ve owned greenland minerals for many years, and the only direction the sp has taken is south….to the point where it is now testing zero. there seems little point in selling them, but i don’t smell a happy retirement anytime soon.
why would hudson resources suddenly be privy to jump the queue?
hot-air is readily available from many sources,..so not holding my breath.

Add a Topic
1209
Add a Topic
1280
david
Guest
david
April 12, 2015 12:43 pm

The thinkolator is correct but the newsletter should have recommended gdlnf in usa or ggg in Australia because they went to a 5 cent low all time low recently and as most of their political problems seem to have been resolved there is a huge upside potential at this time. I have 40000 shares and have held on through the troubles because what is the point of selling this low and I also understand the value of the resource holdings and future of their operations.

Add a Topic
1270
Add a Topic
1278
Michael in Michigan
Member
Michael in Michigan
April 13, 2015 2:52 pm

To “in the know” observer : Was curious as to wich statement the gumshoe was correct about that you were referring to?

Dennis D
Member
Dennis D
April 15, 2015 5:49 am

A little due diligence pays off. I never bother with triple digit returns or play of the decade garbage. If you can short these P & D pigs do it, then you will make money.

Add a Topic
899
Myron Martin
Irregular
April 15, 2015 1:13 pm

Invested in Hudson Resources years ago and made some decent profits early on, but then decided development would take too long and sold my holdings. Was also aware of the Greenland Minerals & Energy project but as I recall it was listed in Australia and this kept me from investing, (thankfully) but Greenland is an up and coming mining friendly jurisdiction that should not be dismissed out of hand. With ice free ports usable year round the mineral riches of the island will surely be developed, it may just take longer than a “buy & hold” strategy would justify. You have to know when to be in and when to get out based on the development cycle of the particular company and market demand for its resources.
My current investment in the country is with North American Nickel NAN-V on which I have also done well and will soon have reports on the 2015 drill program. This is a MASSIVE project that will take many years to fully prove up its potential. The story is that Manitsoq is a meteor crater like the Sudbury basin in Ontario and may well have as big a potential as Voiseys Bay in Nfld/Labrador. so it will take patience to unlock the mineral riches that show much early promise. From my perspective having been an early investor in the rare earths space it may well be time to re-invest in Hudson as well. Another Ree investment I am considering that was already a 10 bagger for me in the past is Rare Element Resources RES-v which I bought in Mar/09 @ .55 sold 1/3 on a double and then another 1/3 on a double again and finally my free trading shares at an intra day high of $14.55, a price it has never closed at, but under $2.00 with revised interest in the sector it may be time to re-invest.
The fact is several REE elements have been declared “critical” by both U.S. and European governments looking for domestic supplies rather than depending on China. At least half a dozen companies world-wide in which I have small stakes, are likely to hit it big time for patient knowledgable investors who diligently follow developments in the sector. NO, they won’t all be winners which is why i take small stakes and then only add to my holdings when companies make major steps forward in defining/developing their resource.

Add a Topic
1280
Add a Topic
1270
Add a Topic
964
gil
Member
gil
May 16, 2015 4:24 pm

Only recently discovered sg and really enjoy the discussions.
I have been looking at uk listed Potash miner Sirius Minerals (SXX)
Which looks promising but recently read that Motley Fool said they were running out of cash.
I’d be interested to hear any comments on sg

Add a Topic
392
Add a Topic
329

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x