“This Tiny Company Has the $100 Billion Cancer Cure” sez Penny Stock Millionaire

What tiny stock are they pitching for "The Breakthrough: Curing Cancer Through Enhanced Immunity."

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, August 12, 2015

There is little that makes investors (and human beings, frankly) perk up their ears more quickly than talk of a “cancer cure” … each of us has either been touched personally by cancer, or seen friends or loved ones hurt or killed by one of the many forms of this ugly disease, and we know that a cure would be both a boon for mankind and a millionaire-maker. A hot new cancer-fighting blockbuster drug like Avastin or Herceptin is the holy grail for biotech investors, who hope that their little stock could turn into the next multi-billion-dollar Genentech or Amgen or Celgene.

So, naturally, the investment newsletters like to use the promise of a hot new drug to get our attention — particularly when they can pitch us about a top-secret little tiny company with some heretofore misunderstood breakthrough that mainstream investors just don’t get, but which is going to (so they say) generate gains of 10,000% for investors who are clever enough to (subscribe to the right newsletter for $499) and buy the right stock.

This time around, the spiel is for a newsletter called Penny Stock Millionaire, from the Angel Publishing Folks and edited by Alex Koyfmann — the last few teaser stocks of his that we’ve sniffed out over the past year or so have mostly been genuinely teensy companies, with market caps well under $100 million (sometimes under $20 million), and so far one of those picks is up by about 30%, one is down by about 25%, and one is down by just a few percent… so perhaps this one will break the tie?

Let’s see what they’re pitching… here’s what got my attention:

“Early investors are poised to see gains of 4,000%, as this small company has found a way to destroy cancer… for good.

‘We’ve seen these drugs working in a wide range of cancers… we are at the beginning of a new era in treating cancer’
— Dr. James Larkin

“… it ALL revolves around the Didiscus oxeata, more commonly known as the Caribbean sea sponge.”

You could be forgiven for writing this off as the “son of Stellar” — those who got sucked into the Stellar Biotech story about their “cancer cure” (among other things) based on the immunotherapy potential of the Megathura crenulata, another noncharismatic ocean creature, had plenty of opportunities to lose money on a story that was long on high-end excitement and short on financial specifics… but this is apparently not someone who is creating a colony of sea sponges, but someone who has found a way to synthesize the active compound found in these sea sponges in a lab… so they don’t have to be either farmed or hunted to extinction.

That’s the goal for many of these appealing compounds with medical uses that are discovered in nature, of course — find a way to synthesize them so you don’t have to create giant tanks of mega mollusks and talk them into reproducing, or raze the rainforest looking for more plants or frogs, or extract ingredients from more charismatic animals like horsies and bunnies.

So what’s this compound? Apparently it’s something called curcuphenol — here’s a bit more from the ad:

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“For nearly a decade, medical researchers around the globe have relied on a chemical compound known as curcuphenol.

“Curcuphenol is simply the scientific name for what amounts to secretions from sea sponges…

“… as of right now, curcuphenol only comes from one place: the Didiscus oxeata, a.k.a. the Caribbean sea sponge.

“And these sea sponges only grow in one very specific part of the world: off the coasts of Jamaica and Colombia….

“… dozens of important drugs rely on curcuphenol…

“In the medical field, it’s used as an HIV treatment, a tuberculosis medicine, an anti-malaria drug, and an anti-microbial, among others.

“This may not seem very exciting, but think about it: It’s not a stretch to assume that because it’s so scarce, curcuphenol extracted from the Caribbean sea sponge sells for well over $100,000 an ounce.

“However, it’s been found that curcuphenol is also a key component in the fight against cancer.

“But due to the high expense of harvesting these sponges, it’s no wonder companies haven’t been able to develop a cancer cure (until now).”

So that’s what we’re looking for — the lab who synthesized curcuphenol and is developing some way to use it in cancer treatment. And yes, it’s probably going to be super-tiny.

Any more clues that we can feed to the Mighty, Mighty Thinkolator to get our answer? Just a few…

They have these two folks working in their lab:

“A PhD recipient from the Swiss Institute for Cancer Research in Lausanne, Switzerland who’s spent more than 30 years researching cancer and immunotherapy treatments.

“A world-renowned expert in biomarkers for Alzheimer’s and Oxford University graduate who’s discovered the ‘control room’ for immune system response in humans.”

And some more specifics about what this curcuphenol can be used for…

“Murray Aitken, executive director of the IMS Institute, says of this special class of drugs:

‘We’re at the edge of a major breakthrough in terms of cancer treatment.’

“The best part is that this type of drug is exactly the kind that’s made from the chemicals in Caribbean sea sponges, and it’s exactly the kind that has in-the-know investors licking their chops over the company I’ve been telling you about.

“Aitken goes on to say, ‘Few had options before, but we are seeing many new drugs become available in the future.’

“Two drugs similar to the ones Aitken describes are Opdivo by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Keytruda by Merck.

“These two drugs are primitive versions of the drug made by the tiny company I’ll reveal to you in a moment.”

Well, he’s not going to “reveal it to us,” of course, because we’re not going to be sucked in and write a check for $499 just to hear about a “secret” little company… but we can reveal it to you with just a whisper more in the way of clues. Here’s a bit more from the ad…

“The type of treatment I’m talking about is called cancer immunotherapy, and it’s designed to use a special class of chemical compounds (like the kind derived from sea sponges) to make cancer cells visible to your immune system.

“This is why Aitken and the rest of the IMS predicts cancer spending will continue to grow by 8% over the next couple of years…

“And it’s why investors in the tiny $6 million company I was recently tipped off about are doubling down on their positions.

“This company is going to change the game for this type of treatment, and it could even have its hands on the ever-elusive cure for cancer….

Nobody Knows About This Opportunity.”

And, of course, there’s lots of stuff that you’d think a copywriter would be a little embarrassed to write…

“Not only has this company discovered an endless supply of cancer-curing chemicals, but it’s also positioned itself to corner the most valuable cancer market in history…”

And plenty of ridiculous hyperbole, comparing this company’s breakthrough to the discovery of DNA, or penicillin, or AIDS drug cocktails… and liking this company’s breakthrough and potential to companies like Gilead, Biogen and other long-term 10-20,000% gainers in calling this one an “easy 4,000% gain.”

But what is it? Keeping in mind that this is a $6 million company so no one should be pitching it if they have more than five subscribers, and I shouldn’t even be writing about it for you — there’s little chance that a stock this small could absorb 100 enthusiastic new investors without making the price go entirely irrational.

Still, we like to solve our puzzles — so I can tell you that the Thinkolator identifies this one as bioMmune (IMU.V in Canada, BIMUF OTC in the US).

I’m tempted to tell you to run, full speed, away from any company that uses stupid capitalization in their name… but that’s probably just my inner grouch talking, certainly silly names are commonplace in the markets, and endemic to biotech as they try to cleverly include their technology in the name.

So who are these guys?

Well, the two hinted-at scientists at BioMmune are Dr. Wilfred Jefferies and Dr. Reinhard Gabathuler, who are also the headline science names at larger (but still teensy) BiOasis (BTI.V in Canada, BIOAF OTC in the US) — the other name common to the two companies is Rob Hutchinson, who is on the board of each and was one of the founding shareholders of the “blank check” company (MC Partners) that raised money back in 2012 as a capital pool and, about a year later, raised more cash and acquired BioMmune.

This is really an early stage R&D company, as you can probably guess from the fact that it has a $6 million market cap (C$8 million) — they did just raise another million dollars a couple months ago, which should see their research through for a while unless they’re really planning on stepping up the pace. They couldn’t have waited all that much longer, their filings indicate they were down to about $80,000 at the end of May and they’ve been burning through something like $150,000 in the average quarter recently. And yes, those numbers are raw numbers — they really had only 80 thousand dollars in cash at the end of May, which means that everything on the books looks like a rounding error if you’re used to looking at larger companies.

What’s the technology? Well, it looks like much of the research at the company is based on screening their library of marine compounds for immune response activity, specifically for those that can help increase MHC Class 1 expression in cancer molecules and therefore help the immune system to recognize them, one step in helping the immune system fight off cancer — which is the broad aim of immuno-oncology, certainly a huge area of research and a probably revolutionary jump forward in fighting cancer (that’s what the big picture quotes from Murray Aitken are about in the ad, the huge spending on cancer research and the advancements being made in general, certainly not specific to BioMmune).

Curcuphenol is the first one of these compounds BioMmune has identified, tested (not in humans, but in the lab and in animals), and synthesized… and they say it can be cheaply and easily synthesized, as can four other (unnamed) compounds they’ve identified as prospective. This is part of their work, but it’s mostly what was teased so I focused on that — they have apparently applied for patents relating to Curcuphenol and three other compounds as of last Fall, but I don’t know whether they will end up really “owning” those compounds or the specific method of synthesizing them… or if, assuming that this particular compound does end up being valuable, there might be multiple other methods that are effective.

So yes, the teaser is about a real company that is doing real work with a compound with potential cancer immunotherapy applications that really does come from marine life — in this case, one of the compounds was originally identified in that sea sponge. But be very, very careful — investors are usually accustomed to investing in or speculating on companies who have developed drugs and tested them on animals and applied for FDA approval to test them on human beings or, preferably, have already tested them and are working through the multi-year process of defining the safety and efficacy of the drugs in clinical trials. That’s not what this company’s doing, and it’s not even very close — this company is far too tiny, and the research far too early, to even think about the FDA. Maybe the technology is amazing, maybe it will turn out to be important — and maybe, if it is important, it will turn out that this company has valuable ownership of the intellectual property in that eventuality… but it is extraordinarily early, this is stuff that would normally be done in a University lab (and indeed, that’s where much of this work was started, at the University of British Columbia), and it’s so teensy and “not ready for prime time” that it probably shouldn’t be a publicly traded company. Not that this means the company is bad, just that companies who have to raise a million dollars to get through a few more quarters of lab research aren’t really designed to meet the expectations and disclosure requirements of publicly traded stocks.

And that’s about all I can tell you — I have no idea whether the stock will rise or fall in the month and years to come — it has risen 30% or so just from the attention from this newsletter in recent weeks, I expect, and it may well rise further for a brief while just because I’ve written about it for you today (one reason I’ve published this after hours, so folks can at least have a few minutes to think it over while the stock isn’t trading), but there’s no rational argument that you can really make about whether this company should be worth $10 million versus $100 million or whatever other number you wish to invent — it’s a research lab run by some scientists who are also working on other projects (and at other companies), they’ve identified some promising things in the cancer immunology space, but it’s also a brand new and tiny, tiny little company with a ridiculous little market cap of $6 million … by way of comparison, immuno-oncology giant Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) earns roughly that much in profit every single day, so if BioMmune has a breathtaking technology that is in hot demand among all cancer researchers and has proven their ideas enough that they’re likely to rise by 4,000% in any foreseeable future, well, why wouldn’t someone who follows this area incredibly closely and has cash to burn (like BMY or dozens of other large biotechs and pharma companies) have snapped them up? Odds are, it’s either because these firms like to let little speculative R&D firms burn their cash on science and wait until something is proven before striking, thus reducing risk, or that this earth-shattering 4,000% gainer (insert sarcasm emoticon here) just fell through the cracks up there in Vancouver, and it’s been left to little ol’ you to be the beneficiary.

You can make your own call, of course — it is your money. You can see their SEDAR filings here (that’s the Canadian equivalent of SEC filings in the US, quarterly reports and the like), and their investor presentation from March here if you want a little more info on this one, and feel free to let us know what you think with a comment below.


Irregulars Quick Take Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)

27
Share your thoughts...

avatar
17 Comment threads
10 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
23 Comment authors
Travis Johnson, Stock GumshoeTracy HartfordMedMuseRobert Keiperejay Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

DrKSSMDPhD
Member
👍47654

It’s quite close to junk science, and the company will go under, I predict. The whole raising class I MHC expression is premised on weak data, and it is fatuous to assert that doing such a thing to a tumor will call in an immune response. Gross oversimplification by the company and the teaser writers. The compounds in question function for their aquatic makers as antifungals.

Add a Topic
5916
stronguard_d
Member
👍4
stronguard_d

I only had to read the first sentence to realize I agreed. Although, I guess I am pretty skeptical of cancer cures anyway, just because cancer seems freaking invincible sometimes. Also, how would an anti-fungal compound even begin to fight a tumor?

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
rkeiper12
Member
👍0
rkeiper12

Agreed. This stock will go the way of StellarBiotech and the methura crenulata. Their is an immune boosting neutraceutical which is widely used in Europe on cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy which has an excellent track record. One can thoroughly research this nutritional supplement online (there is tons of available data on this supplement. It is called Avemar here in the U.S. In Europe, it has a different brand name. Avemar is produced by a company in New York and the price runs about $200.00 per month. You can unveil the production company’s name by searching online.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
3397
baxenden
Member
👍14
baxenden

I think big pharma is making far too much money on ‘treatments’ to ever allow a cancer CURE to come to market. Yep, I’m that cynical.

Add a Topic
3397
LKH
Guest
LKH

That’s one of the problems of allowing sectors that should be operating in the “public interest” to operate only privately….Profit trumps public interest, so even if someone does find a “Cure of Cancer” (people claim they have all the time), if it interferes with both drug company and other medical industry profits on cancer, it is likely to be ignored. Same for almost all chronic diseases. Goodness, medical schools don’t even teach people to think about “curing diseases”; they teach people to control symptoms with pharma…..

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Anamorph
Member
👍1033

Guys, please. If you don’t understand what an incredible gold rush any kind of cancer cure would be, or the difference between medical school and medical research, please come over to Dr KSS’ section of SG and read up a bit. There are dozens, maybe hundreds, of companies working on treatments or ‘cures’ for cancer, which is an excellent and necessary thing because ‘cancer’ is not one disease but many, possibly even several disorders at once. It is incredibly complex and most of those companies will fail, in fact billions of dollars have been wasted in attempts at cures that… Read more »

Add a Topic
210
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3932
richingv
Member
👍23
richingv

there is no way big Pharma will allow a cancer cure, too many people will be in the soup lines. That is why I don’t donate to cancer research because all the billions that have been donated have resulted in early detection at the best.

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
aunt_barb
Member
👍18
aunt_barb

Great job, as always, Travis! The irregular gummies won’t fall for this pitch, but you’ve undoubtedly saved many thousands of dollars for many, many site tourists. Keep on keepin’ on; we appreciate your creative diligence. And thanks to Dr. KSS for weighing in over here. Having you both together puts a “Prime” stamp on the bottom round of this one.

Add a Topic
3932
aunt_barb
Member
👍18
aunt_barb

“….this one.” refers, of course to the masterful critcom, not the putrid pitch.

sct2ali
Irregular
👍114
sct2ali

I subscribed to Penny Stock Millionaire some time back (for a lot less than $499), but have no plans to renew. Koyfman has had decent results with his recommendations to date, but making only 15% or 23% (closed trades), or even 61% on one stock, with highly speculative picks (and thus, one would think, prudent “conservative” investments in each one), is not going to make anyone a “millionaire” any time soon. (The four picks I have invested in are all down, but not by much from my own purchase prices – which obviously colors my view of the “service.”) Interestingly,… Read more »

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
899
SuperOwl
Guest
SuperOwl

I’ve only found stock gumnshoe recently and have been impressed by the tile if fact and logic over hype. I received an email (unsolicited) about this “opportunity” and did a bit if my own research into it as i’ve been involved with cancer research in the past.
The review here is spot on!
It also seems a good bet that anything that promises thousands of percent return is highly suspect … As I’d anything that costs 20 or 30 cents.
Nice job, think-o-later.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
3397
AlRawnaq
Guest
AlRawnaq

I agree with Dr KSS, having been involved in Cancer Research too. This company should have never got to the IPO stage, highly speculative and too far from phase 1 trials to to even speculate whether their drug candidates have a chance of therapeutic success. Avoid unless you like flushing money away!

Add a Topic
3932
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
636
SuperOwl
Guest
SuperOwl

That last post should have read “rule of” instead of “tile if” in the fist sentence. sometimes these auto-complete things have a way of getting ahead of my writing skills. Sorry!

Joe lahr
Guest
Joe lahr

I read the headline and thought it was going to be about ADMD. Nope. Pharma will never let this happen, but radiogel might have a shot
http://www.microcapdaily.com/advanced-medical-isotope-corp-otcmktsadmd-in-focus-today/112671/

pere_joseph
Irregular
👍8
pere_joseph

Cure for cancer? Avoid it!! Keep your body “sour”. Applevinegar, Lemon and honey in your green tea. Stop eating/drinking sugars, (Soda’s, Dunkin Donuts, Snickers,etc etc). Forget the regular visits to the big M and the likes. The body and mind can heal anything. More difficult so in big cities :-(. But Travis, as 1 of your most loyal members I appreciate the work and analysisses you provide. Regards

Add a Topic
3397
Rusty Brown in Canada
Guest
Rusty Brown in Canada

I’d like to use honey as sweetener in my tea and coffee, but to me that comes under the heading of “drinking sugars”.
No?

Add a Topic
3838
Add a Topic
5916
Harold Hansen
Guest

I don’t know how you can say, “That’s why I don’t give money to the Cancer Fund…,” that’s a lousy
Response for someone that is just cheap!
How do we get anything done if we don’t give a little? By that tone, you wouldn’t give your friend a
Dime for a bowl of soup. Youre one hell of a skeptical bastard, sorry.

Add a Topic
3397
Mark
Guest
Mark

@Joseph, Cancer eats glucose, Being able to fast and avoiding all sugars when you are not fasting just might help. Their is this guy “Ty bollinger” If you goggle his name you can learn a lot about the subject if you or a loved one has cancer. @harold I usally don’t either, however Travis asked for the Jimmy Fund so I sent in a few bucks. To many dead cancer cell in your body at the same time can cause other problems (including death), I’m not a Doctor or anything. My brother recently passed from cancer so I been trying… Read more »

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
3397
Mark Power
Guest
Mark Power

The comment “The compounds in question function for their aquatic makers as antifungals” made by Dr.KSS MD PHD is quite interesting. There is an Italian oncologist Dr. Simoncini who has a credible and tested theory that Cancer is actually a cellular fungal infection of Candida Albicans. Candida ia an anerobic sugar loving fungus. He found Candida Albicans (or simiar strains therof) in over 90% of all tumors he biopsied. He wrote a book called “Cancer is a Fungus” (which I have read). His dirt cheap cure involves injections/infusions of sodium bicarbonate directly into the tumor. Candida is rapdily killed in… Read more »

Add a Topic
3932
Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
1358
emanigol
Member
👍2
emanigol

On one hand the myth of a magic compound that cures it all never dies. I remember when someone was selling a magic drop to cure cancer in Europe. He claimed he found it in his garage and it was a kind of organic solvent (well, at least it was organic, hate to give up on benzene). 30 years on, he still sells it. Then there is the lone scientist (like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burzynski_Clinic), who is misunderstood and criticized, yet holds the magic cure. These myths live off of a powerful placebo effect and the body’s “will to heal”. But my recent… Read more »

Add a Topic
3397
MedMuse
Guest
MedMuse

Rain Soul and Core,
Balances PH and works to detox and as anti inflammatory. Ck UTube ..

Harold Hansen
Guest

As a novice, I understand that it’s a lack of oxygen To our cells, and I’m not so sure cancer eats glucose, but what I understand is that it thrives on Refined sugar. Oxygen is supposed to kill it. My whole take on it is that it’s already been cured, The Govt has got a hold of the FDA, and it’s just another way for them to see the population go down. I know the don’t give a damn, that’s why they sent us to Vietnam Nam, to have us killed. It’s a strange world we live in. And if… Read more »

Add a Topic
3397
Add a Topic
1358
Add a Topic
3022
tim allen
Guest
tim allen

lemons yes cancer and many others love acid . Mayo clinic sites: ” 98% of all sickness can not survive in a PH+ body = pure lemon juice best w/.25 teaspoon/day sodium bicarb

Add a Topic
3397
ejay
Guest
ejay

i have been taken squalene for 25 yrs. they said it prevents cancer, still has my fingers cross taking my 2/day

Add a Topic
3397
Tracy Hartford
Guest
Tracy Hartford

Another biotech company worth taking a look at it is one that no other Philip Frost has expressed his backing on this rising biotech company. The company has developed a new third generation hepatitis B (HBV) vaccine called http://bit.ly/1G35L8G. It is has already proven to be 98% effective as it has been approved in 10 countries globally and the amazing thing is it’s been shown to be 100% effective on newborns. It has already been tested in 20 separate clinical trials on over 5,000 patients.