Become a Member

“Chi-Tab — Can You Make a Fortune from China’s Newest Computer?”

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, February 10, 2011

I certainly don’t mean to impugn those without sight or hearing, but if you can read or listen, and have ever given your email address to any kind of financial website, chances are pretty good that you’ve been pitched this week about the “Chi-Tab” by Frank Curzio for his pricey Phase 1 newsletter at Stansberry and Associates.

The ad is long and full of interesting stories, as most of them are — and it is very light on specifics, which serves mostly to make your friendly neighborhood Gumshoe work a bit harder than usual. I confess that I did have to dust the snow off the Thinkolator for this one.

The basic pitch is that tablet computers, which they tease as “Chi Tabs”, will be a huge market, particularly as firms fight to sell them to the emerging Chinese consumer. This includes the iPad, of course, but also all the competitors that we have seen so far and will see in far larger numbers in the year ahead … so probably half of the ad is about this general premise: tablets are irresistible, and we’ve always yearned for this kind of simple computer, but only recently has technology caught up to demand to develop desirable tablets that people around the world will clamor for.

I won’t argue with that, and it’s not news — it may or may not work out for all the tablet companies out there, but clearly this segment of the market is quashing the short-lived “netbook” lite laptop, and maybe it will replace the idea of a desktop computer for emerging market consumers who are currently using their cell phones to access the web.

And then we start to get allusions to the one stock that Curzio is teasing as his play on the “Chi Tab”:

“The most important factor of all, is that it doesn’t matter which one of these 25 companies wins the ‘Chi–Tab’ race because we’ve found one tiny firm, which could easily shoot up by many multiples – no matter what.

“You see, this Chinese–based company makes a highly specialized microchip that controls a critical function in the “Chi–Tab.”

“I won’t get into the details of this function. It’s that specialized. But let’s just say without it, the computer wouldn’t operate. That’s why this firm has protected every conceivable aspect of their technologies. For instance, they have over 606 patents worldwide. And over 770 pending!”

OK, so not a lot of clues, but there are a few in there that might be useful, particularly the patent stuff.

Perhaps a few more crumbs for us sleuths, Frank?

“The bottom line is, no company who’s serious about dominating the Chinese “Chi–tab” market can even compete without the technology this company specializes in.

“That’s why it’s clients already include Acer, Apple, Dell, Fujitsu, Hewlett–Packard, Lenovo, LG Electronics, NEC, Samsung, Sharp, Sony and Toshiba, just to name a few.”

And then we get the one clue that provides a real definitive answer:

“According to one analyst, the more ‘Chi–Tabs’ sold, the better this small company will do: ‘The main thing is, [the company] is much smaller… So even selling a few million [‘Chi–Tab’s’] makes an enormous difference in its ultimate revenues and profits.'”

The person quoted here isn’t a traditional Wall Street analyst, but he is certainly a well-followed writer. And just to keep you squirming for a moment longer, let me toss in the only other clues that I saw sprinkled in this long letter/presentation:

“In the next few months, TWO of the largest computer manufacturers in the world are planning to launch their versions of the ‘Chi–Tab’ in China

“I won’t name names… but these guys are both FORTUNE 500 companies…

“And – get this – our tiny ‘Chi–Tab’ specialist supplies both of these companies!”

Do you have room for one last clue? We’re also told that this company has a market cap of $233 million — I don’t know what day they measured this, but the ad is brand new this week, we should be able to assume that it’s still within shouting distance of that number.

So which semiconductor company is this that’s apparently got some kind of hot “Chi-Tab” technology?

From those clues, the mighty, mighty Thinkolator tells us that this must be … O2Micro (OIIM)

There are a few areas where this comes up as an odd match — O2Micro, for example, claims that they have thousands of patents, not the 606 granted and 770+ pending that the teaser tells us about. Their big area where they apparently have expertise and a nice patent position is in power control, both for powering devices and, more specifically, for powering LCDs efficiently. So that would certainly be a key for tablet manufacturers, though I have no idea whether their patents or technologies are any better than anyone else’s — it seems unlikely that their way of powering an LCD is the only way, since if it was they’d be a lot bigger.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


But we can get to the 606 and 770+ numbers from public sources — there was a SeekingAlpha republished bit of analysis on OIIM that claimed 606 patents for this company and 775 pending patents, you can see it here, those numbers are from 2009. If you want the actual reported numbers from the company, in their last quarterly report from about a month ago they claimed, “O2Micro International maintains an extensive portfolio of intellectual property with 15,621 patent claims granted, and over 16,000 more pending.”

And that quote from an analyst? That was basically about how this company can move more than Apple, because it’s a lot smaller than Apple, another of the arguments that Curzio was making in the ad. The analyst in this case is James Altucher, and the quote is from a blog post that he made for the Wall Street Journal — you can see the whole article, “Three Tech Companies I Like Better than Apple,” right here, but the salient quote without redactions is:

“02Micro International (OIIM) does the LED lighting in the iPad. The more iPads Apple sells, the better 02Micro will do. The main thing is, 02Mirco is much smaller than Apple. So even selling a few million iPads makes an enormous difference in its ultimate revenues and profits. And the company trades as if it were a virtual bankruptcy. It trades for only two times cash.”

That’s still pretty close to being true, by the way — the blog post came out in July, but OIIM still has more than $3 in cash per share and no debt, and the share price is below $8. Not two times cash, but pretty close to it, and if you take out the net cash position the stock is trading for just about 1X sales, which is very low for a profitable company (net profit margin is around 8% over the last twelve months). The stock goes for about 1.5X reported book value right now, also quite inexpensive.

So that must mean there are concerns of some kind, right? Perhaps even beyond just the basic worries that you’d have about any tiny stock in the brutally competitive semiconductor business? Probably, but I don’t know specifically what they are. They discontinued a line of network security products to focus on their power supply and control products last year, which had some impact on the numbers, and according to management commentary it sounds like they probably had front-loaded sales last year as customers restocked, though they issued some generic optimistic statements at the end of the fourth quarter earnings report — this is the quote from CEO Sterling Du that they offer by way of 2011 expectations:

“The year began on a high note and slowed down as the inventory correction ran its course. As we enter 2011, the supply chain looks much healthier and our products are well positioned to address both core markets and new areas alike. We’re looking forward to strong sales of power products and ramping up our business in new markets.”

The market cap is in the ballpark — it’s up to about $290 million right now with the stock at $7.90, but the shares were 15-20% or so lower less than a week ago and were near $6 before earnings in late January (Curzio has already issued this recommendation/report to current subscribers, apparently, though the S&A conference call to discuss it isn’t until next week, so perhaps those subscribers piled in and helped drive the shares higher).

And I have to leave you there — given the shortness of real clues there’s always some question, but the specific quote from Altucher helps me to be quite confident that this must be the stock Phase 1 is teasing. I didn’t know anything about OIIM before today, and I still have just the quick reaction of “looks cheap” and a basic understanding of what they do, which clearly includes a lot of power and battery management stuff that’s completely unrelated to tablets and consumer electronics. I have seen at least one person say that their chips power the LCD for the iPad, which if true (Apple usually tries to keep supplier agreements very hush hush), and if they have a competitive advantage that Apple can’t shift to another supplier or hack away at OIIM’s margins, could certainly help their numbers as iPad sales continue to go nuts … but I certainly don’t know if all the “Chi-Tab” makers will be forced to beat a path to O2Micro’s door. If you know this company or have any insight into the business, I’m sure we’d all be delighted to hear it — the comment box below isn’t there just for looks, you know.

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
hedy1234
hedy1234
February 10, 2011 3:12 pm

Travis Once again an excellent review. Stock is dropping today on volume that is 5 times the 10 day average- so likely new buyers while others are cashing out. I would buy after it drops and restabilizes.

Add a Topic
5971
EOR
Guest
EOR
February 10, 2011 3:38 pm

I had owned this stock for years and it has underperformed. I finally cashed out yesterday. Maybe its a mistake, but I think I can find better uses for the funds.

Add a Topic
5971
Kim
Guest
Kim
February 10, 2011 4:05 pm

Perhaps the differences in claimed patent numbers is down to definitions. A lot of patent regimes have a lesser kind of patent to "protect" incremental improvements where the inventive step is not great enough to warrant a true patent. Perhaps these are included/excluded in the count according to who is counting?

tomt
tomt
February 10, 2011 4:36 pm

Minor point, but there can be many claims in one patent, and the average probably is 10 or more claims per patent. hawking the number of claims as opposed to the number of parents smells like wall st. spin.

David
Guest
David
February 10, 2011 4:57 pm

How about Corning as a play on ballooning sales of ipads. Their glass, I think it’s called “Gorilla Glass” is widely used for its touch sensitivity, strength and endurance. Although I’m sure competitors will emerge in the not too distant future, at this time, I am led to believe, Corning almost has a monopoly.

Add a Topic
1291
Add a Topic
285
Add a Topic
1291
Michael Perine
Michael Perine
February 10, 2011 5:23 pm

Thank you Travis for revealing this teaser's stock. I listened to Frank's reading of his teaser just yesterday. Thx much for revealing this stock so quickly. I can't afford Phase 1 Investor @ $3,000/yr.! But, I can afford to buy OIIM. Because of your "sleuth" skill and devotion I am able to invest in this promising growth stock.

Peace,
Michael Perine
Lost Wages, NV

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
4arepublic
Member
4arepublic
February 10, 2011 6:47 pm

Travis- this comes from today's S&A Digest:
" New 52-week highs (as of 2/9/11): CARBO Ceramics (CRR), HMS Holdings (HMSY), O2 Micro International (OIIM), Take-Two Interactive (TTWO)."
Thanks for the info on OIIM- it was down a bit today, but sounds interesting.

SageNot
Member
SageNot
February 10, 2011 8:57 pm

I haven't been here in awhile Travis; but your thinkolater is right on again! Are you thinking of taking it public, after you secure a patent or copyright?

Dlst
Dlst
February 10, 2011 11:42 pm

Why would they use a word -for-word quote from Altucher (well-known analyst) and thus give away the company name so easily? Plug that quote ('So even selling a few million makes an enormous difference in its ultimate revenues') into google and Altucher's blog is at the top of the list of links (well, now just under Gumshoe's)! Thanks—haven't gotten the tease yet.

Add a Topic
5916
dalelama
dalelama
February 11, 2011 7:54 am

Travis thanks for the quick answer. For what is worth Curzio has produced excellent results for me, He recommended NUSMY when it was 1.36, I got on at 1.66 and rode it to 3.5 in about 7 months.

DockJS
DockJS
February 11, 2011 2:55 pm

OT does anyone know anything aboutAmarok Resources-gold mines

Deb R
Deb R
February 11, 2011 3:41 pm

Travis, you truly are the 'Sultan' of gumshoe-ers …but I could just as easily see you in the middle of a dirt main street with a six shooter on your hip ready to whitle the man in black down to size! lol Well, bottom line is I'm really happy to have joined your membership. thank you for all you do….great reveal on the Chi-Tab issue

Jimster
Guest
Jimster
February 11, 2011 9:15 pm

Not so fast, I think you may want to listen to that grueling presentation again. I think your market cap and the number of patents were off by a factor of ten. I am quite convinced the stock is a PRKR. I think you must listen to the presentation again and verify that I am wrong. There is only one chip company on the major exchanges that fits. Check and tell me if I am wrong. PRKR If you tippitoe in in small increments of 2000-3000 share at a time you won't drive it through the roof before you get enough shares to make you happy. I am no expert, and I caution you I MAY BE WRONG BUT I GOT A TON OF PRKR ON MY BET IM RIGHT.

Add a Topic
5971
Frank
Guest
Frank
February 11, 2011 9:26 pm

Chi-Tab is something like Tablet with energy, if you translate Chi as universal energy. A Chinese member here should be able to translate better. Power is not too different from it either. Maybe that is why Frank Cuzio called it Chi-Tab.
I just read about the Indians from India saying they will make the Tab for less than $35 and the other Indians saying they will never make it for that, because the Chinese will get there first.

Good job Travis.

Add a Topic
247
jimster
Guest
jimster
February 11, 2011 9:54 pm

I am wrong . Just listened to presentation again. Sorry, PRKR is not it, my bad.

bowmacwood
Guest
bowmacwood
February 13, 2011 1:01 pm

OOIM . I listened to the recent conference call and I sure did not hear much of anything about TABLETS or NETBOOK opportunities. I mostly heard about opportunity in the Automotive business. Sounds like their "big thing" is chips that control POWER to LED stuff that is becoming huge in automotive. I dunno, I was pretty sure that the CHITAB was OOIM but after the C Call, I am not so sure.

Add a Topic
285
Joe
Guest
Joe
February 13, 2011 2:14 pm

OIIM is the stock he’s talking about. But I would not buy it until it re-treats at least 20% from here.

Add a Topic
5971
bowmacwood
Guest
bowmacwood
February 13, 2011 3:56 pm

Hey Joe, how are you so sure that OIIM is what Curzio is pumping? Are you a Phase 1 subscriber? I do certainly agree with you that a pullback is required before buying. Like I said, I listened to the C call and they do have a "broad" customer base BUT it seems their chips are very cheap and "commoditized" from a pricing standpoint. It also appears that Anaylysts are happy they dumped their underperfrming network biz.

Edward
Guest
Edward
February 15, 2011 7:14 am

Where can i find this teaser anybody have a link

streek53
streek53
February 15, 2011 7:59 am

http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1102DILCHIV

Note that he gives the name of the first buyer in China (it escapes me at the mome, but it's there), so I copy/pasted it to a Bing search, and the results noted that the guy bought an ipad. See for yourself.

Add a Topic
108

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
34
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x