“The single most controversial recommendation we’ve ever made…” (Frank Curzio)

Sniffing out the stock recommended by Stansberry's Phase 1 Investor as "The Most Controversial and Undervalued Gold Stock in the World?"

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, March 4, 2013

Phase 1 Investor is the big kahuna newsletter at Stansberry & Associates, the $5,000 newsletter that they typically discount to $3,000 when sending out promo emails …

… and they market this letter so heavily that Gumshoe readers flood our inbox whenever a new Phase 1 teaser ad runs.

So … another of their teasers hit the inbox heavy over the weekend, and it sounds like a doozy.

Here’s how Frank Curzio introduces it:

“I’ve recently discovered a very interesting, and possibly a very profitable, situation with a small gold stock I’ve been watching…but I want to be clear from the start:

“What I’m about to share with you may be the single most controversial opportunity you’ll ever see at S&A…

“As a matter of fact, this situation is so controversial and this stock is so small and volatile that we hesitated to even share this fascinating story.

“But for the right people, the situation is potentially so lucrative that we’ve decided to share the details in this presentation and let you make your own decision. Fair enough?”

OK, well that’s reasonable — that’s pretty much what I have to tell you every time I write about a stock: I can tell you about it, but if you’re dealing with individual stocks, even non-controversial ones, then grown-ups have to make financial decisions for themselves. Most folks who would subscribe to a newsletter this expensive are experienced enough to have internalized that info … but someone who wanders by Stock Gumshoe because they’re curious about this heavily promoted teaser might think it’s a guaranteed winner just because an expensive newsletter is recommending it.

I’m writing as I go and haven’t ID’d the stock just yet — I’m sure we’ll get to that in a few paragraphs, given the well-rested power of the Thinkolator on a Monday morning, but we’ll just throw out that “caution” flag here before we even get started. Expensive newsletters often recommend riskier picks or smaller stocks, given their generally smaller audiences, but they don’t necessarily perform better than inexpensive newsletters every time they pick a stock. Phase 1 has had both good and bad picks over the years, and some of them have been failures based at least partly on political/legal/regulatory risks like they’re talking about with this teaser (Groote Resources, for one). The last really successful mining pick of theirs that I think we covered was about a year ago, the Carlin Trend explorer Gold Standard that shot up dramatically early in 2012 on good drilling results … before coming back to earth in the second half of the year for reasons that I haven’t followed (it’s now back down to close to where Curzio first suggested it, don’t know if it’s just the collapse of all gold juniors or if there’s some company specific issue).

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


So that’s the fair warning before we begin — what, then, is Curzio teasing this time as “The Most Controversial and Undervalued Gold Stock in the World?” Some hints for you:

“Here’s the Story…

“Recently, a major gold discovery was made in an unusual location. It also happens to be home to a popular tourist destination. As a matter of fact, about 30 MILLION people have visited this place over the past 10 years and none of them realized how close they were to one of the largest gold discoveries of the past decade.

“According to veteran journalist Michael Theodoulou:

“No one had considered prospecting for gold there because the area had been ignored for so long.

“That is, until a veteran geologist with a small mining outfit, based out of Australia, realized the land near this instantly recognizable landmark could contain incredible amounts of gold and other precious minerals. He began exploring the area and learned quickly that his instincts were correct.”

And then we get into a few things that almost approach being details:

“As it stands right now, this could be THE largest gold mine on the planet

“NOT owned by a major mining firm.

“And here’s where it gets really good…

“One of the mining industry’s leading consulting firms, Roche Process Engineering, has independently reviewed and verified the size and recoverability of this massive gold deposit in a Definitive Feasibility Study. International consultants agree this massive deposit is in the league of the world’s largest gold mines. In plain English, that means there’s real gold – A LOT of real gold – in this deposit.

“The mine has already produced over 600,000 ounces of gold and is expected to ramp up to over 400,000 ounces per year by 2014. That’s enough gold to make this one of the top 25 producing gold mines in the world.

“The total value of the gold in this enormous deposit (as much as 15 MILLION ounces and growing) is conservatively estimated at nearly $25 BILLION – 25 times the market value of the small company that made the discovery.”

OK … so, huge deposit, company that’s worth roughly a billion dollars, already producing. More? You betcha!

“What makes this situation even more remarkable is that practically no one is paying attention to this situation, except for a handful of the world’s smartest industry professionals.

“That’s due mostly to the fact that this is a risky venture… in a very risky place.

“As of this writing, shares of the small company sitting on this giant golden treasure are trading for practically nothing (under $1 per share) compared to the value of the precious metals it controls…but for reasons I’m about to explain, that could change very soon.”

Then we get to the hints about the controversy — the reason this stock is trading at this price, we’re told, is that there’s a lawsuit hanging over them. And it doesn’t sound like it’s the typical regulatory problems for a gold miner or explorer — it’s not environmental problems, or land ownership issues, or lying financiers. Here’s more from Curzio:

“Well, right now, this small gold company is at the center of a major legal dispute over the rights to mine the gold. This is an unusual case. It’s not a dispute between the government and the small gold mining outfit. As a matter of fact, even though the small gold mining company is at the center of the dispute, they are not even a party in the case.

“The case was filed by an activist attorney who believes the contract the government signed with the small miner is unfair. He thinks the government should be making more money from the mine. And that’s why he challenged the contract’s validity in court.

“The courts recently ruled the contract to be 100% legal and valid. However, the contract contained a provision that required the company to obtain approval from specific government officials before gold could be mined.

“Based on the information provided to it, the court found insufficient evidence that the proper approvals were obtained. And for that reason, the court ruled the company’s mining lease invalid.

“Both the government and the small gold company disagree. They insist the proper approvals were obtained. But for unknown reasons on which we can only speculate, the documentation was not provided to the court. And therefore the court made its ruling based on insufficient information.”

So we’re told that to a large degree, the future for this company rests on this legal case. Short version: They win, people jump back on board the undervalued stock; They lose, the company owns nothing of value and the stock plummets. Curzio seems pretty confident that it will work out for them:

The London Telegraph reports the small mining company looks as if it has a good case. And analysts following the situation agree as I’ll show in a minute.

“Another article refers to the lawyer behind the case as ‘a well known trouble maker’ and calls the lawsuit ‘spurious’ and ‘a waste of everyone’s time.’ The author, a professional money manager who has been following the situation closely also says it is ‘highly probable’ that this small gold mining company will win the case.

“But of course, this outcome is not guaranteed. Anything could happen. And if the ruling goes against this promising gold miner, it could lose the mine and shares could tank.”

Curzio even gives a long laundry list of reasons why he believes the company will win, and the mine will continue to grow — I’ll share the headlines here, you can go read his ad if you want all the detail:

  • “Reason #1: The local government has a significant financial interest in the project.
  • Reason #2: The government has thrown its strong support behind our small gold mining company.
  • Reason #3: The mine is critically important to the nation’s developing economy.
  • Reason #4: The government desperately wants to attract foreign investment.
  • Reason #5: The government has made no attempt to shut down the gold mine.
  • Reason #6: Analysts following the story expect this small gold miner to win too.
  • Reason #7: Funds and Institutional Shareholders are loading up on shares.
  • Reason #8: Insiders are buying—hand over fist.”

And one final set of clues to feed into the gaping maw of the Mighty, Mighty Thinkolator:

“These guys have been operating successfully in one of the most challenging environments in the world for over 15 years. The geopolitical situation in this country scares most investors away. Yet the executives of this small mining company have overcome the instability of this region and built the world-class gold mine I’ve told you about.

“To date, it’s the only producing gold mine in the entire country which gives this growing gold miner a significant first-mover advantage. The company continues to overcome all obstacles and deliver results as promised. They recently confirmed their plans for another record year in 2013. They also reiterated their goal to ramp up production to 450,000 to 500,000 ounces of gold per year.”

Enough? Indeed … so we cogitify, thinkolate, calculize and find that this is almost certainly … Centamin (CEE in Toronto, CEY in London, CELTF on the pink sheets).

And why is it so cheap relative to the potential value of their gold in the ground, and the level of progress they’ve made in developing the mine? Well, part of it’s that lawsuit … and part of it comes from a reminder of what the company’s name used to be: Centamin Egypt.

Yes, this is that same Centamin Egypt that was teased by a few folks several years back — one of them almost six years ago in a pitch called the “Gold of the Pharaohs”, covered here when Stock Gumshoe was still wet behind the ears. I later did take a small position in those shares, but was stopped out of them pretty quickly when the stock was falling in the Summer of 2008 — so I missed out on the huge run Centamin had with gold’s rise and the beginning of actual mining at their site in Egypt in 2009 and 2010. The stock topped out around $3 a little over two years ago and bottomed out below 50 cents in a quick collapse when the legal stuff went against them in December, so there’s plenty of volatility despite the fact that it’s a pretty big junior producer.

These shares are followed far more closely in London and Toronto than they are here, so you can see some of the usual kinds of chatter about them on the Motley Fool’s UK website here. Goldman Sachs reportedly has a 130p price target on the shares that would require the stock to rise 150%, and there have been many other folks calling notice to the undervalued shares. Of course, there are also regulatory and operational risks that probably exceed those of most gold miners — there’s one bearish article from a UK pundit here if you’d like a bit more perspective. There’s also a fairly thoughtful piece from Arab Finance here on the legal challenge that quotes the company as anticipating some response to their legal appeal early this year and hoping for a resolution during 2013 — even though almost all miners are suffering now, and Centamin has other issues beyond just their exploitation permit (like rising fuel costs, and customs “intransigence”), a positive legal decision would almost certainly be a positive catalyst for the stock. As Curzio noted, a negative decision, which seems, according to many analysts, to be unexpected now, would be very, very bad for the stock.

Centamin has been operating in Egypt for a long time, with an exploration project at Sukari for a decade or more before they started to build the mine, and plenty of delays along the way for water, fuel, customs issues and anything else you can imagine. The specific lawsuit that’s impacting the shares now is apparently an activist lawsuit focused on reserving Egypt’s wealth for the Egyptian people — the same lawyer filed similar suits in recent years to overturn land sales or similar deals by the Mubarak regime. I have no idea how this one will end up working out, and it is clearly politically sensitive in a country where the political climate has definitely changed significantly — dealing with a young democracy is not nearly as certain or simple as dealing with an entrenched dictator like Mubarak.

Centamin has a pretty good Q&A on their website here about the lawsuit (which has not stopped production at the mine), and they also have a recently updated investor presentation here about the potential of Sukari and their ramp-up plans — assuming that the government or other outside factors don’t interfere, they appear to be in a pretty solid growth phase for getting up to their anticipated 500,000 ounces a year of production in 2015.

So … feel like taking a flyer on what might be a “double or nothing” bet on the “gold of the pharaohs” (at least over the next few months)? How do you weight the political and legal risks against the large size of the mine? Let us know with a comment below.

P.S. Many of the versions of this teaser ad start with a big emphasis on the fact that the “insiders are loading up” on shares of this stock. There has been a little bit of institutional buying from some major holders over recent months, but all the relatively large insider buying from directors and executives happened over the Summer, at prices significantly higher than Centamin trades for today. Insider buying in clumps like this is generally an indicator of a stock that will rise, but they didn’t know about the lawsuit then and insider buying does not guarantee a rising stock, it just improves the likelihood on average.


Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

54 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
takeprofits
Irregular
March 5, 2013 9:40 am

In a frenetic, irrational market like we have experienced since at least mid 2011 it is no wonder people are so polarized about both individual stocks and stock analysts/newsletters.

Nobody gets it right 100% of the time and individuals have different risk tolerances and while I owned Centamin Egypt a few years ago and made some money and have looked at it periodically since for a good entry point, given the current political climate in Egypt I would think it would be a very high risk speculation that is nor justified for the average investor when there are so many solid companies selling at 50% or less of their highs.

Am currently attending PDAC in Toronto and found a silver company with $50. Million in the bank, fantastic resources, great management selling for under .50c and others with a share price well below total assets. For people with available capital they are dozens of bargains out there so there is no need to tolerate high political risk.

If you spend enough time in doing your due diligence and have the courage of your convictions to BUY when sectors or companies are temporarily out of favour you can make a lot of money. If you follow the herd and only buy when everyone is euphoric and the uptrend is already well established you may well end up only buying near the top of a run and then selling in despair near the bottom in the next sell off.

A good example I can cite right now is Molycorp which had been as high as $75. yet has been as low as just below $7. but paid about $11. for Neo Material Technologies which I profiled in a Gumshoe report a few year ago buying @ $5.59 and selling around $10. on the takeover offer from Molycorp. Molycorp is “out of favour” so I can now buy their stock for LESS than they paid for NEO which is still thriving, and a Chilean company just invested over $40 million in Molycorp, yet the market is afraid of the stock which in my view is totally irrational and mispriced, word to the wise, a bargain if I ever saw one.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
98
Add a Topic
443
Sagacious
Guest
Sagacious
March 6, 2013 12:28 am
Reply to  Myron Martin

Molycorp is down 77.5% over the last year and is still on its way down. If you like trying to catch a falling knife, then there’s a good investment for you. Sounds like the writer is down on his investment and trying to generate his own spike through Gumshoe. A minimum of “due diligence” is enough to avoid this recommendation. Just because a stock hits new lows doesn’t mean it can’t go lower. Anyone with a little investing experience has probably learned that lesson.

Add a Topic
1535
Add a Topic
5971
Harley
Guest
Harley
March 8, 2013 12:20 pm
Reply to  Sagacious

“Be fearful when others are greedy and Greedy when others are fearful” W. Buffett
You may eat your words!

olivan leach
March 5, 2013 11:55 am

We have lead our self to think that because some big stocks came from penny stocks its ok to buy this stuff. Sad thing is it don’t matter were the co. is from a dollar stock is like buying lottery tickets to the next million buck drawing. Or going dropping your money in the one arm bandits. If your ideal of investing is along these line’s more power to you,but I will bet you your going to be real sad and broke when you wake up and your just like the millions of fools who buy the lottery tickets. Over the Years I have known a number of people who I would call penny stock people. They tell the tells of the big hits they make,and yet there are all still looking for the next big deal. Yes there all so still broke just like the many who buy lottery tickets and pull on the one arm bandits. So good luck,but it better be a lot of luck for you to make a few pennies on this bird.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Bob
Member
Bob
March 5, 2013 1:12 pm

Question: Isn’t Centamin legal dispute with the Kyrgyzstan government, where it operates one of the largest mines in the world, not Egypt?

👍 16178
takeprofits
Irregular
March 6, 2013 9:35 am

SAGACIOUS: So you think you are a smarter investor than the Chilean company who is one of the biggest players in the rare earths space and based on their “due diligence” invested over $40 million in MOLYCORP when the stock tanked over some operational concerns? Apparently without doing due diligence on NEM, (now Molycorp Canada) which has 20 plants around the world, is highly profitable you still don’t think buying MOLYCORP for LESS than they paid for one of the best downstream assets in the business makes sense? Very astute, of course as a general rule of thumb you are correct about catching “falling knives” and any stock hitting a new low can still go lower, however that only applies if you don’t know the companies involved very well. Even if Molycorp is only now “fairly priced” based on its assets, when the market comes to its senses it will rebound quickly to reflect the underlying value which the Chilean company obviously recognizes.
Maybe you should inform yourself a little better by reading my original profile on Neo Material that was nearly a DOUBLE for me when Molycorp bought it. Given that I also have had 2 more DOUBLES on Molycorp via options your charge of “being down on my investment and seeking to generate a spike through Gumshoe” is just so much uninformed drivel. How do you KNOW that Molycorp is still on its way down as opposed to having hit bottom, do you have a crystal ball? You obviously don’t know the details and fundamentals of the stock since you say; “a minimum of “due diligence” is enough to avoid this recommendation.” REALLY, your comments actually prove that is exactly what you did, “a minimum of due diligence” and are looking only at the precipitous drop in price.
I have actually never owned stock in MOLYCORP because it WAS ridiculously priced, but now that it is at an equally ridiculous low I will be buying because the fundamentals justify doing so, and I could care less how many people reading this do as well, the MARKET will take care of contrarian investors who do their homework and buy “out of favour” stocks when they are “ON SALE” and hated by the market. If you don’t buy low and sell high how will you ever make any money in the market?

Add a Topic
1535
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
1535
John
Irregular
John
March 9, 2013 11:24 pm

Why the Stansberry bashing? As he himself says he does not force his editors to follow any of his own ideas; in fact he insists they think for themselves. I made enough just on Seabridge to pay for all my subscriptions (and I’m now getting back into SA). If you love to speculate then follow Curzio, if you’re more conservative then follow the bond recommendations. It’s you who has to decide what you want to do with your money.
I’ve been to Egypt. My money is not going there.

Add a Topic
372
Crookedneck
Guest
Crookedneck
March 13, 2013 9:22 am