Become a Member

Mampilly’s “Bigger than Amazon and Google combined” Stock Tease

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, January 26, 2018

I know a lot of my readers follow Paul Mampilly pretty ardently, partly because of the fact that his publisher, Banyan Hill, is one of the more aggressive promoters in newsletterdom these days, and partly because he made some very strong picks with his first, heavily promoted service — particularly the teased pick of STMicroelectronics (STM), which his publisher has been pushing pretty heavily, off and on, for more than a year and a half (first covered here, back before his publisher changed names to Banyan Hill).

So today we’ve got a quick bonus solution for you, before I get back to working on my Annual Review for the Irregulars… though really, I should call this one a “guess,” not a solution, because he doesn’t drop enough clues to give us any real certainty. What’s he recommending now?

He’s pitching “New Energy” as a “Mega Trend” for his Profits Unlimited subscribers — meaning renewable, portable, storable energy. And this is what he says about his stock:

“This month, I told my readers in Profits Unlimited to buy into the company that’s leading the new-energy revolution … and that it’s going to be bigger than Amazon and Google combined.

“You see, this company has products that touch every aspect of new energy, from getting its energy from natural sources, to storing it so it can be generated locally and finally, to making it portable so that it can be used for travel.

“With those aspects combined, this company is set to disrupt three massive industries.”

The basic argument is that this company is “disruptifying” those three large energy markets, like Google and Amazon and Netflix disrupted their established markets (advertising, retailing and television) in building dominant businesses that sucked the life out of the older players in the industry (my words, not Mampilly’s).

And he concludes:

“Right now, the energy, utilities and transportation industries are about to go through what Netflix, Amazon and Google did a few years ago to their various industries.

“The old is about to get wiped out, and the new is about to take its place.

“This is an extraordinary opportunity to make massive gains if you are willing to buy into the new companies, like the one I just recommended to my Profits Unlimited readers.”

So what’s he actually recommending? My guess — and it is a guess, this time — is Tesla (TSLA). I can conjure up no other company that has meaningful business in both generating renewable electricity (through Solar City), storing electricity (batteries, including the PowerWall as well as the utility-scale projects they’ve attempted — notably in Australia), and disrupting transportation (through high mind-share and evangelism in electric vehicles).

You’ve probably heard of that stock, no?

So what do you think? Tesla is the very definition of a “battleground” stock, there is no way to estimate what you think the company is worth unless you look a few years into the future and believe that Elon Musk will succeed in creating a much higher-volume electric car manufacturing company and cross-sell those Tesla owners on Powerwall home batteries and Solar City rooftop solar installations.

To my mind, there is no reasonable way to use real or near-term numbers to justify the price of Tesla shares, though analysts keep trying, you have to use forecasting and belief — which doesn’t mean Tesla can’t succeed, it just means that you have to see the future to believe it will succeed, you can’t base your assessment on the rate of growth or the current or anticipated cash flow. To a large degree, Tesla shares are a bet on Elon Musk’s vision of the future and his ability to muscle the rest of us into his vision, and that has worked extraordinarily well for many years.

The numbers that you might use, were you to be so inclined, would probably be the 2019 numbers, the first year that analysts foresee Tesla making a profit. The analyst estimate is for earnings of $4.40 per share in 2019, on $26 billion in revenue (though the range of estimates is huge for both). At that rate, Tesla would be trading at about 2X 2019 sales and 77X 2019 earnings.

The only company with a somewhat similar business that’s in any way comparable on those metrics, at least that I can think of after some brainstorming, is Ferrari (RACE) on price/sales (much higher, about 5X), but that’s because its supercars are an incredibly high-margin luxury business (about 50% gross margin… Tesla’s gross margins in the low teens are squarely between Ford’s and GM’s, both of which trade at about 0.3X sales). Solar installers and product developers don’t trade at anywhere near those valuations, with the possible exception of favored US manufacturer First Solar (FSLR), which is really the sole beneficiary of the recently discussed solar panel import tariffs — solar installation is a growth industry still, but most installers are not particularly high margin companies and the few that are public trade at pretty cheap valuations.

But still, those are numbers that you can work with as you build your assumptions… although we should remember that analysts have been irrationally optimistic about Tesla’s earnings for several years (three years ago, the anticipation was that 2017 would bring $7 per share in earnings — in actuality, Tesla is likely to end the year losing close to $9 a share, thanks in some part to the much slower-than-expected rollout of their “Model 3” lower-priced electric car). Analysts have also priced in an estimate that Tesla will grow earnings at 35% a year, on average, over the next five years… so perhaps you can make that work in your brain if you use the imagined 35% growth number and the guesstimated 2019 earnings number to say that the 2019 PEG ratio could be not much above 2. Which ain’t so bad.

But really, you’ll probably find yourself stuck if you justify an investment in Tesla based on their current or forecasted financials, because it’s not a stock that is driven by analysts — it’s driven by Elon Musk and the power of transformation and imagination as he upends the fossil fuel industry and the car industry and changes the American landscape for the better. You either believe in that and say “Elon will make it happen,” or you look at the numbers and say, “this is the most ridiculously valued industrial company I’ve ever seen.”

Neither is wrong until the share price says its wrong. People have been ardently betting against Tesla because of its wild valuation for five years now, to their detriment, so for now the short side is wrong. This year, I don’t know which way that will turn — presumably a lot will rest on the ability of Tesla (or lack thereof) to really mass-manufacture those Model 3 cars that have been pre-ordered, I expect that if the current logjam loosens, as Tesla says it will, and they begin to deliver those new cars as promised, the stock will probably react well to that… if there are further delays, the stock will probably disappoint. Throw in the new tariffs on Chinese solar panels and whatever you think the future government incentives will be on electric cars or solar power, and you can make your own guesses.

But really, it’s about belief in Musk’s future — buy that and you’ll want to own the stock, doubt it and you’ll find no rational reason to own Tesla at this price. You can make your own call on that, all I can do is guess for you that Mampilly is recommending Tesla to Profits Unlimited subscribers (and, indeed, it has been recommended over and over by growth-stock services over the years). If you’ve got a call on Tesla, let us know with a comment below.

Disclosure: I own shares of both Alphabet (Google) and Amazon, but not any other stock mentioned above. I will not trade in any covered stock for at least three days, per Stock Gumshoe’s trading rules.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

106 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter Whimsey
Irregular
Peter Whimsey
January 26, 2018 10:14 am

$40 is about where I bought some puts- oy vey!
But it has been probably the most fascinating stock I have ever followed- watching the bears and bulls fight it out. I get several emails a day from Seeking Alpha and few days go by that there is not an impassioned article pro and at least one con. I personally think that Jim Chanos is going to make a lot of money on this one, but I haven’t bet either way for the last 300 points, and have no intention to do so.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
3551
Add a Topic
2599
👍 10
Steve Jensen
Member
Steve Jensen
January 26, 2018 10:17 am

The only real question on Tesla is, When will it implode and others pick up the pieces.”

schubrrw3212
January 26, 2018 1:04 pm
Reply to  Steve Jensen

Brilliant thinking, Steve!

The basic issue in “New Energy” is that there’s not any new energy in it. The entire subject is about how to deliver existing energy in other ways. Can batteries outperform generators in cost? A century ago, copper was cheap and sulfuric acid was pricy, so we built enough generators to cover peak demand and used the cheapest energy to run the generators that cover the base load. Nowadays we have two competing new battery technologies taking on lead-acid: Nickel Metal Hydride and Lithium Ion. That resulting 3-way race, is unpredictable. The outcome depends on the cost of the different metals that go into each battery type. Prices must rise until either more metal is mined, or landfills and scrap heaps get stripped to recover recyclable sources of metal. Nickel, copper, cobalt, lead, and lithium are all in play. Complicating matters, zinc has enormous industrial value but many of the best potential zinc ores contain lead. Lead toxicity is a concern, that has pushed it out of the consumer electronics business. Mandatory recycling laws in the European Union make it very difficult to dispose of lead, so someone must volunteer to make batteries from it, just to take over whatever lead batteries Tesla’s gigafactories displace. The main advantage a lithium ion battery has is that it is lighter to carry than a lead battery…reasonably the Tesla Powerwall should be designed to use lead batteries, because houses don’t need to be portable. Yet Tesla is pushing the Powerwall as an outlet for it’s lithium batteries, an exercise in sheer vanity.

At some point, I think the zinc shortage will compel additional lead use.

Under the Obama Administration, there was a standing US Government order to stockpile 1 billion bullets, made of lead. Temporarily that stabilized the lead market, giving zinc miners an outlet for their byproduct lead. If China retaliates in the current trade war (in which Trump accuses China of dumping solar cells on the market for less than it costs China to make them, which squeezes out competition so China can then raise the price), this superfluous order for unnecessary bullets could be treated by China as a US subsidy of Tesla’s Gigafactory, giving an excuse for a prohibitive tariff on Tesla products sent to China.

China could severely inconvenience Silicon Valley’s microchip business if it embargoed sales of tungsten to the US….they control about 80% of the world’s supply. But Elon Musk talks a good line of bull***t and markets can remain irrational longer than anybody can remain solvent…so short interest in Tesla should be pursued with caution.

Right now, the fortunes are to be made in the junior mining companies that go exploring for new sources of copper, cobalt, nickel, lithium, and zinc. In the time it takes for TSLA to go from a $340 stock to a $700 stock to a $40 stock, some junior miners will go from a 50 cent stock to a $12 stock and then collapse back to $5 and get acquired by a metal smelting company. I’d prefer to ride the 50-cents to $12 move and sell out of it at $9, and do it several times, rather than wait for TSLA to reach it’s peak and then nosedive.

Add a Topic
1576
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
964
👍 78
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 3:49 am
Reply to  schubrrw3212

The “new” in new energy is renewable. Fossils are extinct, which might be a clue to “old” energy resources.

Jcat
Member
Jcat
May 29, 2018 2:34 am
Reply to  schubrrw3212

What are the best junior miners to buy now?

saint stephen
January 26, 2018 10:22 am

I don’t like companies that don’t make money. Why pay for the future today?

Add a Topic
372
👍 341
manhattanmadman
manhattanmadman
January 26, 2018 10:43 am
Reply to  saint stephen

$tesla

Why pay for a stocks future potential? Because with Tesla I can buy solar roof tiles to power and heat my house. I can add their wall battery and keep energy stored. I can buy a car that charges off that battery and never buy gas again.

With Tesla’s products I’m never paying for energy again. If things go well I can even sell back energy into the grid.

I’ll pay for the future because this is th future.

Think back to how much money you have pumped into your car or house to keep them running. Many American households can save $10000 per year.

Think about transportation companies running trucks all day long and the amount of savings when they run only on solar.

Think about the environment. America is falling behind fast.

I’m Long Tesla.

Add a Topic
372
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
👍 140
viktor69
Irregular
January 26, 2018 11:27 am

I’m all in for EV’s and alternative energy and really hope we’ll stop burning fossil fuel soonest but, what I fail to understand is why Tesla will thrive in such an environment? There are plenty of companies that produce EV’s (I see some Renault’s through my window actually) and many more when it comes to solar panel and the like. And those companies show a profit unlike Tesla…to me the current stock price reflects just Mr Musk’s vision, nothing more. The journey from visions to reality requires an excellence in implementation, not really Tesla’s strength.

Add a Topic
33
Add a Topic
5971
👍 83
existentialist
Member
existentialist
January 27, 2018 11:11 am
Reply to  viktor69

Because project managers and financial analysis are cheap and you can’t buy a “vision”. Why does Apple do well in the smartphone sector when they took 3 years longer to implement biometrics?

Torospartan
Torospartan
January 28, 2018 5:45 pm
Reply to  viktor69

If we don’t burn the fossil fuels what will we do with them? There are many things produced from Crude Oil (Furniture, Clothing, Insulation, Plastics, etc). Even EV vehicles use a lot of plastic. Batteries are ok in cars but I wouldn’t fly an airplane that didn’t use jet fuel and If I lived in a cold environment would not want to have to rely on a battery for heat instead of using heating oil.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
359
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 4:45 am
Reply to  viktor69

Elon Musk’s vision brought the planet to the realization there is a better way than perpetual air, H2o & soil pollution, perpetual oil wars, 9/11/01, Exxon-Valdez, Gulf Horizon, emf drop across the grid, distributed generation vs black & brown outs, TMI, Pripyat & Fukushima, a tile roof protecting us & the home while powering us & the home, negative electric utility rates charging our stationary & mobile batteries. If Tesla never makes a dime of profit & goes bankrupt, it will have been the most profitable venture ever produced by mankind, because it introduced us to the sustainable, which fossil ventures cannot do, mathematically or otherwise.

At the end of the driveway, across the street, there is a house with solar panels on the roof, which charge 2 Tesla PowerWall batteries on the garage wall, which charge the Nissan Leaf & Chevy Bolt batteries in the garage at night. If the grid goes down, that house will be the only one not dark at night & able to charge cell fone batteries, computer batteries & car batteries.
Until the grid is up & running again, combustion engine cars won’t be able to pump fuel with dead electric fuel pumps at the gas staion, while the Leaf & the Bolt keep on trucking. The next day, the cycle repeats. That is the real news. The rest of it is fake.

Add a Topic
359
dcohn
Member
February 17, 2018 11:20 pm
Reply to  viktor69

There is no fossil fuel. Oil is a natural renewable energy of Earth our planet.

There is zero evidence it is from degraded dinosaurs and so utterly stupid to even consider that animals turned to oil floating on too of the land.

Google it. There is tons of scientific evidence explaining exactly how oil is simply part of the geology of the planet. By lying and saying how rare it is Rockefeller or whichever animal of Greed at the time basically created an impassible monster for over a century now.

Is it really not much more logical if you think about how much oil there really is. Many huge Wells would never run out if they pump it at the same rate it creates itself.

It’s all a scam. But why believe any scientific evidence when we can say it’s from dinosaurs 2 billion years ago. Much more logical as we spin around 1000 mph on our planet and worry about spending too much money we don’t have.

Elon Musk has made it very clear and I agree with him and Jim Carrey. We are spiritual beings and these individuals we act as are constructs. We are all ONE and Love is our true nature.

Something has driven us from our true selves and we are in terrible pain as dark times prevail. As we become awakened and return to our heart space we will attain the bliss that is our heritage. We are creators or our destiny but we have list our way.

The solution is Love thy Neighbor. The solution is to Love no matter what. If someone is rude to you feel their pain. Help them deal with their issue. Obviously this is difficult to do. Good does not come easy. Something very nefarious has driven our species to such troubled times.

Look at the drama everyone has. They stories about their boss or their illness or the government or some news story that must be true if it was on TV or WSJ or Fortune Magazine.

People watch the news and believe it. No evidence at all since you were not there yet they would never lie to you.

Everything on TV is made up as a story. If something similar occurred it was driven by the story first not vice versa.

Wake up is our only chance. Love thy neighbor. Everyone. Every race. Every color. Welfare and bums. Once the people are all on the same team the rest is easy. The day will come for some. Others will remain blissfully unconscious and yes I am the crazy person. I am in good company. Elon Musk. Jim Carrey have both said the same thing I have been taught. So much I know nothing about. It’s beyond my ability to even grasp how vibrations create physical objects seen by multiple people. Yet do any of us really know what other people truly see when we both look at the same object?

/

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
2676
Add a Topic
359
👍 222
frank_n_steyn
Irregular
January 26, 2018 1:04 pm

Batteries have to be replaced.

👍 475
archives2001
archives2001
January 26, 2018 10:11 pm
Reply to  frank_n_steyn

As well as solar panels!

👍 94
Randall Hart
Guest
Randall Hart
January 27, 2018 2:40 am
Reply to  frank_n_steyn

I bought PRIUS HYBRID IN 06, ENGINE DIED THIS December, dealership said battery looked as good as new, we had 408000 miles on it.

Add a Topic
1614
glbcpa1
Member
January 27, 2018 12:53 pm
Reply to  Randall Hart

So, you immediately purchased a new one, right? Just curious to know.

Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 4:46 am
Reply to  frank_n_steyn

Bodies coming home from the oil wars have to be replaced.

Add a Topic
359
Torospartan
Torospartan
January 28, 2018 5:31 pm

First you will pay a premium price for that Tesla. Then you will pay higher maintenance costs vs a Toyota or Honda whose gas engines are classified as being pretty close to zero emissions vehicles. I live in SoCal and pay $24/mo for gas and about $96/mo for electric. My water/trash bills and cable/internet and cell phone bills are all higher. As far as environmental impact – 50% of a vehicles environmental impact is made in the production of the vehicle. EV vehicles have both higher production and disposal environmental impact that gas engine vehicles.

Add a Topic
372
Add a Topic
372
Add a Topic
372
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 4:49 am
Reply to  Torospartan

How many gas engine (non-hybrid) vehicles die at 400,000+ miles?

J.Dean
Guest
J.Dean
September 6, 2018 8:49 pm
Reply to  Loy

if people kept them they would last beyond that. My truck has 330k and counting. Most people buy or lease a new one instead of maintaining or repairing what they have. Another factor is keeping up with the Joneses. A gas engine with proper maint can last over 500K miles. Also note I have had one repair. Power steering pump failure. It is the one thing I have never flushed and ran synthetic fluid in. I will not do that again

J.Dean
Guest
J.Dean
September 6, 2018 8:40 pm

I can do all those things too. Only I would do it with companies that make a profit. They are not the only electric vehicle producer, solar company or battery producer. Tesla is however the only one who does all of those. They just do not do them well. Too many ideas and irons in the fire tearing him into multiple directions. If it weren’t for the hype people would have dropped his stock a long time ago. Think GE and it’s stock. GE is closer to profitable. It pays a dividend. Their products can be and are useable today. Their products are priced in line with their competition. It tanked because people thought it was too big and going in too many directions that it lost focus. Now look back at Mr. Musk and his company. The cars are over priced and not profitable. He has not met a deadline yet. The solar roof shingles are way over priced. The battery prices are unjustified. You can make an imitation cell in your garage for 2k when he wants 7 to 10k. I priced a solar system with Jinko panels and inverter to meet 100% of my electrical needs from 2 installers. One was $21k, the other $22k. Tesla roof system quoted me $54k. Rebates would have gotten me to around $38 to $40k. For the money I can get a 50 year metal roof, solar panels, battery back up and have over $12k to pay towards an electric or hybrid car. We have not even touched on the subsidies it has taken to run his dreams, or the ones necessary to set up a nationwide recharging network.. Another thing to think about is the environmental impact of his projects. How long will investors fund his dreams?

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 4:15 am
Reply to  saint stephen

Exxon doesn’t make money. It is on welfare – oil depletion allowance, carbon credits, depreciation allowances, no charge backs for zero pollution remediation & oil wars, etc. Renewables will never be granted the welfare of a depletion allowance. Fossils will never have access to free resources such as gravity, temperature differentials, wave & tidal action, wind & sunshine. Renewables will be profitable because mining, oil wars, drilling, shipping, piping, refining, & a 2nd shipping, + air, H2o & soil pollution can never compete with free resources & zero emissions. There is a century of book cooking that lets markets say fossils are “profitable”. Just how profitable was Exxon-Valdez, Gulf Horizon, TMI, Pripyat & Fukushima? How profitable is the voltage drop across the grid vs distributed generation? How profitable are rising fossil generated electricity rates vs falling wind generated electricity rates? When have you ever heard of a fossil fuel power plant producing negative electric utility rates, which wind power plants have done recently on occasion? Your companies which “make money” are cooking the books & using smoke & mirrors.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
359
dcsipp
dcsipp
February 1, 2018 8:48 am
Reply to  saint stephen

It’s called investing. Albeit with risks.

👍 5
Dan
Guest
Dan
January 26, 2018 10:24 am

I recently drove from Michigan to Colorado, making my first stop for the night in Ogallala Nebraska at the Lonsome Dove hotel. In the parking lot behind it were 8 very impressive charging stations for Tesla cars only with two cars plugged in. I don’t travel or stay in hotels much so this is the first anything from Tesla I’ve seen. I was surprised and impressed. The investments are costly I’m sure. The cars are pretty sharp and it appears you can drive across the country and find places to recharge.

tomtom73
Member
tomtom73
January 26, 2018 10:35 am

All the schemes for electric vehicles and non-carbon fueled electric generation are based on foolish government money grants/incentives/tax incentives. Even with government favors the schemes barely break even or get close to making a profit.

Also, the battery storage technology has hit a wall, even with lithium as the periodic table of elements offers no successor element that will work. Electric vehicles will have a limited range and will be dependent on an electric grid or infrastructure not much different from what we have now. Few want more hydroelectric dams or nuclear plants and carbon fuels are about the only way to do 24/7 and quick startup for peak loads.

Tesla may have an interesting niche product for those with extra disposable income or status seeking but don’t bet on it for the mass market.

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
2096
Add a Topic
996
👍 121
andrea
Guest
andrea
January 26, 2018 11:11 am
Reply to  tomtom73

agreed, hydro fuel cell innovation is much much better and safer, and has a better distribution of “fuel” ( salty water) installed at excisting gas stations ( cheap ). Hydro fuel cell. keep an eye on it!

Add a Topic
540
ves
Member
ves
January 26, 2018 12:48 pm
Reply to  andrea

that’s why Ballard is the future.

Chet
January 27, 2018 8:23 am
Reply to  tomtom73

For millions of years man dreamed of going to the moon. For thousands of years man talked about doing it. For a couple of hundred years he was working on it. A few decades ago he stepped on the moon.
For all that time there was an abundance of people would come forward and vehemently point out all the reasons and ways that man would fail at this goal…still, man kept focusing on what was working and leaving behind the failures and all the naysayers.
If I’m not mistaken, the leading cause of carbon in our atmosphere comes from the cars we drive. How then, can ANY efforts made and from ANY source be considered a frivolous waste of time and effort unless those considerations be for self serving, if not down right nefarious reasons?
Trump favors the fossil fuel industry and his tariffs on solar panels is a not so thinly vailed proof of that to be sure.
He has been after a war since he took his oath of office. This trade war he has launched may not cost us any blood on the outset but it will surely hurt Americans where they can afford it even less…their pocket books.

frank_n_steyn
Irregular
January 28, 2018 1:42 pm
Reply to  Chet

“For millions of years man dreamed of going to the moon”, more like dreamed of where’s the next meal going to come from.

👍 475
pieter132
pieter132
January 29, 2018 5:52 am
Reply to  Chet

It is never been shown in the press but many scientist are coming out and showing the carbon hoax, invest accordingly

http://humansarefree.com/2017/09/31487-scientists-say-global-warming-is.html

Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 5:02 am
Reply to  Chet

The Flat Earth Society thinks Tesla is a failure.

dcohn
Member
February 17, 2018 11:30 pm
Reply to  Chet

Believe they went to the moon huh.

And no other country ever wanted to go. It was just a few trips and then we decided against going anymore.

China went i forgot but no humans or animals.

Van Allen belt that has some enormous radiation that even today they talk about being unable to get past.

How did the tin foil ship protect those people again? What’s the Secret Space Program is not on TV so it must not exist.

https://steemit.com/news/@an0nkn0wledge/the-origins-and-50-years-of-evidence-of-a-secret-space-program

Add a Topic
108
👍 222
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 4:59 am
Reply to  tomtom73

What gasoline vehicle doesn’t have limited range? How do you pump gasoline when the grid is down? Distributed generation with renewables is the end of the grid. Negative electric utility rates are the end of utility companies. Have you heard of wind power producing negative electric utility rates? There are search engines where you can look it up. Why would you want fission new culler power plants when there’s free sunshine & wind? I think combustion engines, both internal & external, have hit a wall as unsustainable.

CHARLES F. MOORE
Guest
CHARLES F. MOORE
May 19, 2018 9:35 pm
Reply to  tomtom73

I know a person who has a Tesla. She said they advertise a range of 250 miles on a full charge but driving in the City is about 210 miles. I live in a large City of about 3 million people and she said there is only one Service center for Tesla.

StockMidas
January 26, 2018 10:41 am

Spot on with TSLA Travis.

Never thought I will say it about a $57 Billion company but in this instance investing in TSLA is probably a bit of a punt. But the FOMO will probably prevail – Mr Musk is no idiot by any stretch of the imagination and TSLA will continue to attract a large investor basis.

👍 260
caseydalpal54
caseydalpal54
January 26, 2018 10:45 am

I have traded it with CALLs and PUTs, made a little money but never considered actually owning any shares. I missed out as well. And almost every time I PUT it I should have CALL’ed it … LOL

👍 2
redbear
redbear
January 26, 2018 10:47 am

TSLA is one you throw some pretty penny and hope 10 years from now, it is where it wanted to be 10 years ago. I did it with a nice list and been handsomely rewarded with amzn, Goog, Aapl, nflx, fb, pcln just to name the obvious. Added TSLA 2 yrs ago, but let’s see 10 years from now.

Add a Topic
45
Tony
Member
Tony
January 26, 2018 10:56 am

I believe Mampilly is referring to ORA. Check it out.

StockMidas
January 27, 2018 7:55 am
Reply to  Tony

Travis is correct on this one – it is TSLA that Paul Mampilly is referring to.

Add a Topic
2799
👍 260
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 5:05 am
Reply to  StockMidas

Mampilly recommended ORA last year.

RUSS
Member
RUSS
January 26, 2018 11:09 am

TRY ORMAT TECH

Add a Topic
1071
👍 21779
Egidio
Member
Egidio
January 26, 2018 11:21 am

One of the things that most of us miss out, when trying to analyze a stock like Tesla is, in your face metrics, and then there is faith behind a visionary like Mr. Elon Musk, who believes in the betterment of mankind.
The young people,are the future, and as long they have faith in transforming the future to their way of perception, then there will always be a future in company like Tesla. For the betterment of mankind, then L, as a member of the old guard, my hat goes off to a visionary like Mr. Elon Musk who understands this type of ideology, and will definitely attract more and more people to his vision .

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
3239
Add a Topic
3239
BJI
Member
BJI
January 30, 2018 2:36 am
Reply to  Egidio

“betterment of mankind” my sweet patootie! He owns 5 houses in Cal and NONE of them, I think, uses a solar roof or solar panels. His plant in Nevada DOES NOT USE SOLAR PANELS! His EVs are priced out of the reach of those now driving the MANY TENS OF MILLIONS of vehicles in the United States that are MORE THAN 11 YEARS OLD!!!

Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 5:18 am
Reply to  BJI

He’s a tad busy to re-roof 5 houses on your schedule. His NV plant won’t be completed for years, so take a look at it then. And it could be powered by wind, another renewable. His Model 3 production has hit a snag, but it hasn’t gone the way of Studebaker, Packard, Hudson, Oldsmobile, Kaiser, Dusenberg, Stanley Steamer, Mercury, Whippet, Willys, Fargo, Desoto, Nash, Pierce-Arrow, Edsel, Airflow, Vega, yet. And all of them were priced out of the reach of Greyhound riders.

Add a Topic
5978
Moe
Guest
Moe
April 11, 2019 11:12 am
Reply to  BJI

The Gigafactory in Nevada uses a ton of solar panels, and is slated to run on 100% renewable energy (including wind) by the end of 2019.
https://cleantechnica.com/2018/08/27/tesla-gigafactory-to-be-powered-100-by-tesla-solar-by-end-of-2019/

Add a Topic
2676
pieter132
pieter132
January 26, 2018 11:33 am

Another development which is increasingly pushed by many western governments which if you analyse the energy capacity of
electric cars and their performance it really borders at insanity that our so called leaders push for such a wrong direction.

you can read the battery technology is still insane poor in 2017.

Battery capacity by 2030 is said to be 240Whr/kg. The energy content of propane is 13,900Whr/kg (availabe and guaranteed NOW) – some 58x more energy dense. Even after factoring in losses due to energy change the comparisons are still orders of magnitude different.
There is zero reason to move to EVs given the abundance of fracked gas (LNG) availability – the push for EV’s is the usual corporate/banking inspired scam to perpetuate the debt cycle by forcing change onto a market that doesn’t want it or need it.

Another development which is increasingly pushed by many western governments which if you analyse the energy capacity of
electric cars and their performance it really borders at insanity that our so called leaders push for such a wrong direction.

Still the world will move into EV just I would like to know how they ever gonna charge even 10% of the global car fleet if they would drive electrical.

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
653
👍 58
Random
January 26, 2018 12:50 pm
Reply to  pieter132

Things have moved on a lot in the last 10 years. According to Tony Seba, the cost of solar+battery storage will very soon (next few years) be not only cheaper in most markets than conventional generation, it will be cheaper than electricity distribution costs even if centralised power stations could generate power for free. Worth watching one of his talks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2b3ttqYDwF0

👍 51
aegetswil
Irregular
aegetswil
January 29, 2018 1:43 pm
Reply to  Random

What a great video. Very eye-opening!

👍 6
Kaypay
Kaypay
January 26, 2018 12:57 pm
Reply to  pieter132

What you are missing, Pieter123, is that the Gen xers and millennials do not want to use any type of fossil fuel, I have ten grandkids and everyone of them are far smarter then we of the baby boom generation. At the speed at which technology is advancing it is only a matter of time when EV’s will be able to run many hundreds or thousands of miles per charge. There is a future with out the old IC engine and the world will be better for it.

pieter132
pieter132
January 27, 2018 6:24 am
Reply to  Kaypay

@ Kaypay the Gen xers and millennials have it completely upside down. Have you every give it a thought what fuel runs the shipping industry globally, the road transport, rail transport many of these companies are selling a fantasy just the reality is different. Just try to run a container ship, truck with batteries they you understand only energy density. In the mean time let the gen xers and millenials dream on their smartphone, time will tell of course. Just a reminder 20% of the electrical power in the usa is powered by nuclear power which power is gonna replace this wind or solar? Not to forget to mine all this graphite, cobalt, nickel etc the good old diesel is required.

Add a Topic
1278
Add a Topic
2575
Add a Topic
1113
👍 58
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 5:57 am
Reply to  pieter132

All ocean travel & shipping was wind powered for centuries. It will be again, when fossils become too scarce & or too expensive. Expensive is likely to come before scarcity, as negative utility rates (wind powered) have come before we’ve run out of money. New culler power was sold as “too cheap to meter”, but it hasn’t worked out that way at Pripyat, Fukushima & a number of others shutting down & not being replaced. Maybe you could help new culler power by storing spent fuel rods in your backyard swimming pool. They might even pay you a handsome fee for that service, billed to rate payers of course. Since we have new culler powered aircraft carriers & submarines, you could make all shipping new culler to save the air, H2o & soil pollution from combustion engines. Put a bug in Precedent Twitter’s ear.

Add a Topic
372
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 5:30 am
Reply to  Kaypay

Thank you!

dcohn
Member
February 17, 2018 11:34 pm
Reply to  Kaypay

Brainwashed by today’s curriculum in school to generate business in the planned industries.

We are slaves.

👍 222
ALFIE
Member
ALFIE
January 26, 2018 6:32 pm
Reply to  pieter132

You are completely correct on the energy density. In addition, half of all electricity generated is dissipated as heat. Then the charging of the battery uses half for heat. Then half of the battery usage is heat. this is a lot of losses!

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 6:14 am
Reply to  ALFIE

The low energy density comes from free sunshine, free wind & zero emissions. The high energy density comes from body bags coming home from the oil wars, the air, H2o & soil pollution, the superfund cleanup sites, acid rain, Exxon-Valdez, Gulf Horizon, the overthrow of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi by the Ayatollahs, the twice bombed WTC, the flaming of the Pentagon, a dry hole drilled in Shanksville, PA, the Precedent’s revival of black lung disease, cross-border drone assassinations watched in real time at the White House by President Obama & his Cabinet, the drilling, the killing, the flaring in the Niger Delta, & many other expenses most of which we have yet to pay for.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
372
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 5:28 am
Reply to  pieter132

Are you about to unveil your propane car? Musk just helped South Australia with a battery peak plant & is helping Puerto Rico recover with solar instead of kicking them after the hurricane. No matter how “weak” battery power is, it can be recharged free with negative utility rate wind power. What has propane or any fossil power ever done that was free as in no drilling, no killing, no flaring, no well blowouts, no shipping, no spilling, no refining, no oil wars, no body bags, plus waves, tides, temp differentials, winds & sunshine? Jello

Add a Topic
1270
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
glbcpa1
Member
January 26, 2018 12:28 pm

Apparently, he is making the recommendation of Tesla primarily on the “Batteries” as the vehicle sales will not make one rich.

👍 170
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 6:32 am
Reply to  glbcpa1

Tesla is vertically integrated, producing solutions for generation, storage & consumption of energy. It is revolutionary, disrupting & repartitioning industries & economies. Mr. Musk understands success is not always measured in money, as he is not American. A profitless, bankrupt Tesla, even in the long-term is still a success, having jump started the revolution. Viva revolucion!

SageNot
Member
SageNot
January 26, 2018 1:14 pm

Too expensive, no positive earnings & Tesla’s founder is now into space ventures which are expensive & who knows when they earn a buck?

Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 6:33 am
Reply to  SageNot

Too shallow analysis – based on Almighty Dollar worship.

kfoehr
kfoehr
January 26, 2018 1:25 pm

Jeff Bezos was a pioneer in online retail and later expanded into consumer electronics and cloud computing — all very big markets.

Steve Jobs brought innovative consumer electronics products to the new mobile computing market (a huge global market), creating some products that didn’t exist before, and creating a marketing edge for those products with outstanding design and user interfaces, and he created a new online music market to increase profits from those devices.

Now Elon Musk is going to grow similarly with solar panels, batteries and EVs, when the world is full of similar products and competitors? I doubt this very much. He needs a much better mousetrap to pull that off and I don’t see it yet.

When I was a kid the American car market was dominated by a handful of car companies, now practically every developed country in the world has at least one car company and many have two or more – most with EVs either on the road or planned.

Musk needs either a huge new market, like Bezos and Jobs had, or products significantly better than competitors’, like Jobs also had; otherwise, he will never reach the level of revenue and market cap those companies have achieved, imo.

Maybe TSLA will merge with SpaceX and he can do it through space travel – but Amazon is already there too!

Add a Topic
3345
Add a Topic
2962
Add a Topic
3239
👍 17
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 6:44 am
Reply to  kfoehr

Musk is making the world a better place in which to live, using physics, instead of the tactics of Ghandi or Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., or Mohammed Yunus or Malala Yousafzai. Money accumulators don’t make the world a better place in which to live. They only accumulate money & impose RPR, IPR, DMCA, EULA, patents, choke points & denial of access to the commons, such as the digital divide.

brown7228
brown7228
January 26, 2018 2:06 pm

I really am having a hard time investing in Tesla. Trump has put a tariff on solar. I was going to lease a 2018 Honda Highbred minivan guess what “you can’t get them in this country”. In a web site that rated the five best minivans there was an article about hydrogen as the coming fuel. I replied to him about the coming new batteries with graphene that are rated at 500 miles between charges. A battery with life use time of 150,000 miles. It’s also much lighter than anything on the market today. I also stated that I wanted to buy the Honda. His reply was that someone has the Patten on their type of battery and has no intension of manufacturing batteries. I have also read in the DOE web site they plan to build 10,000 fueling stations with Hydrogen by 2020, and 30,000 by 2030. The holdup is the effect of Hydrogen on the welded area and the steel. They are working on a coating a composite of graphene and some form of plastic.
Europe seems to be much further ahead on battier technology. Graphene is the key. I own Talga tlgrf) and Australia Company that has over 30 million tons of Graphene in Sweden In one of their articles they stated they can’t sell into the American market. I once lost $45,000 on Gasfrac that had a process of fracking with liquid natural gas. When it pumped out of the well they recover 95% and don’t create the Earth Quakes the water causes. The one thing I learned from this was you can’t fight the fed’s and doing what best for the country. If hydrogen is going to be the fuel of the future why would you buy Tesla? What I would like to see is the 500 mile charge battery with a fuel cell powered by hydrogen that charges the battery when needed. I figure less than 20 times a year for about 12,000 miles of driving.

Add a Topic
2576
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
👍 13
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 6:49 am
Reply to  brown7228

Interesting. Hydrogen storage could prove to be more problematic than electricity storage.

Martin
January 26, 2018 2:27 pm

Tesla is the stock that he was promoting

Add a Topic
5971
👍 164
Ralph DiMaio
Member
Ralph DiMaio
January 26, 2018 3:31 pm

Remember most of Tesla’s Products to be fully functional Still rely on coal, Gas, petroleum and nuclear power! So where is the big gain? maybe a temporary one at best! Solar cells, Hydrogen, Fuel from Salt water……burns 100% clean, we are making cars and trucks run on it now. Company, Clean Energy. Trading really cheap and growing very slowly.

Add a Topic
1337
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 6:56 am
Reply to  Ralph DiMaio

Across the street from the end of our driveway is a house with solar panels on the roof which charge 2 Tesla PowerWall batteries on the garage wall which charge the Nissan Leaf & Chevy Bolt batteries in the garage every night. Where is the coal, gas, petroleum & new culler power in that loop? And that’s not even counting wind turbines or hydro-electric.

Add a Topic
1337
JayBee
Guest
JayBee
January 26, 2018 4:02 pm

I have always believed that hydrogen will be the fuel of the future, maybe not so much for driving but for bringing cheap, clean energy to those parts of the world that currently have no access to electricity. I have been long for over a decade in a company called Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. (HYEG). They have a product that I call the “Energy Podule” that will bring a multitude of benefits to the most downtrodden people on the planet. I buy 10,000 shares of HYEG at a time, and it costs me maybe $1000 including commission. I could maybe buy 3 shares of Tesla for that same amount. You do the math. I would rather spend $1,000 to buy 10,000 shares in a visionary company (HYEG) that has 51 million shares outstanding, as opposed to spending $1,000 to buy 3 shares in a visionary company (TSLA) that has 168 million shares outstanding.

wheelsup
wheelsup
January 26, 2018 5:06 pm
Reply to  JayBee

Once Gov subsidies were removed, Danes were suddenly much less interested in green vehicles. EG, Tesla sold 2,738 units in Denmark in 2015 and just 176 in 2016.
I bought a Toyota Hybrid years ago only to find out that that I’d have to drive 100’s of thousands of miles to balance out the energy costs needed to manufacture both car & battery.
My grandfather was a patent lawyer for another visionary – Edison and though many of his “visions” were brilliant successes, many failed badly. So I remain a Tesla skeptic.

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
👍 17
Loy
Member
Loy
February 1, 2018 7:04 am
Reply to  wheelsup

It’s always stunning to see how frequently the cost of mfg a car & battery pack comes up since Musk revolutionized the production, storage & consumption of energy, when no one was concerned about that cost for more than a century. It’s like suddenly not being able to see the forest because those doggone trees keep getting in the way.

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Sherry
Member
Sherry
January 26, 2018 4:24 pm

Somewhere I heard about sneakers that will create energy as you walk to power your cellphone. If this can be done, then how about inventing tires that create energy to power your vehicle when the tires are rolling.

dcohn
Member
February 17, 2018 11:45 pm
Reply to  Sherry

The real Tesla in 1925 had that technology built and working. Free electricity for everyone plus unlimited distance. He created the wireless generator and the car with the receiver.

They easily could have made money but it also would have helped man grow free.

People would have more options to learn on their own. Control was not strict enough. They easily could have created codes on the receiver based on the sending signal but it was a life changing invention. Technology would have helped every man.

So dream on my friend. We live in a police state. You can argue and say it’s not but you know it is. The Patriot act ended our freedoms.

Add a Topic
570
👍 222

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x