Become a Member

Solving Mampilly’s “Tech Industry Set to Surge 76,000% (And the One Stock You Must Buy Today to Cash In)”

What's being teased as "This Tech Stock Could Triple Your Money in 2020" by the latest Profits Unlimited ads?

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, October 28, 2019

This article was originally published on Halloween, 2018, but we’re getting a ton of new questions about it so they must be running the ad heavily again. The ad has NOT been updated in any meaningful way, but some significant things have changed for this stock over the past year (though the stock price is right around where it was a year ago), so I’ll go through and add a few updates here and there as warranted.

Paul Mampilly is pitching his Profits Unlimited newsletter with a long spiel about artificial intelligence (AI), which seems to mostly be a tease from a presentation he recently made on stage at a Banyan Hill “Total Wealth Symposium” in Las Vegas (well, in September of 2018 — so it was “recent” when the ad started running).

And we like to think for ourselves, of course, so I thought I’d dig into the clues he drops and see if we can name that stock for you — maybe you’d love his newsletter, maybe you’d hate it, but if you subscribe to a newsletter just to find out about a secret stock… well, odds are pretty bad that you’ll be able to think rationally and independently about that stock afterward. Lots of biases get in the way, including: We all have a tendency to justify purchases, so you’ll probably want to love that newsletter because you just paid for it… and most investors end up being very strongly influenced by the first piece of information they receive about a particular stock, so if you buy into this “76,000% gains!” pitch without any context, you’re setting yourself up for disappointment.

So with that said, what’s the story? Mampilly here is pitching us on the huge growth in artificial intelligence… here’s a little taste of the ad:

“Major consulting firms predict this technology will create 2.3 million jobs in the next two years and give businesses the chance to raise profits, across the board, by nearly 50%.

“Which is why the big money is piling in.

“Microsoft has dedicated $12 billion to this technology.

“IBM is investing $15 billion.

“Google is spending $30 billion.

“Intel has already put up $32 billion to acquire multiple startups in this space, for the single goal of pushing this technology forward.”

And the 76,000% number that he throws out as red meat for us is just pulled from a big picture speculation:

“At $20 billion, this technology is tiny compared to the internet, smartphones and computers.

“However, the world’s leading researchers estimate it will explode into a $15.7 trillion industry in the next five years, growing bigger than all of these — COMBINED.

“That’s a 76,000% growth.”

You can throw around pretty much any numbers you want for that kind of big picture stuff, they won’t mean anything. Yes, we concede the artificial intelligence is a massive focus of most big tech firms, and is making its way into every part of the economy… but it’s almost impossible to even rationally guess at what the size of the “A.I. market” might be now, let alone what it might become, and we don’t even know what those numbers mean — Sales? Market capitalization? Profits? I have no idea. For context, the United States annual economic output, as measured by GDP, is just shy of $20 trillion. The world’s GDP (or GWP) is closing in on $90 trillion. Will AI, however you describe it, account for 20% of global economic activity?

But anyway, yes, we know that AI is big, and that tech companies and manufacturers and advertisers and product developers and pretty much everyone is trying to use artificial intelligence to make smarter decisions more quickly.

Man, maybe I should get me some of that AI. I do everything slowly, and am rarely as smart as I hope.

So how is one to make money from this idea? Mampilly says he’s identified a catalyst that will bring this technology forward… much like the assembly line was for the automobile, or miniaturization for the computer, or email for the internet. Something that turns a developing technology into a huge economic force.

What is it? Well, let’s see what he says:

“…. this company has developed THE catalyst that will cause the most important technology in the world to reach mass adoption.

“just like people doubted the use of the automobile, computer and internet, people have doubted this technology too!

“That’s because it’s been stuck in this range for the last 30 years.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“But they’re not focusing on the ONE catalyst set to usher in this breakthrough any day now.

“Nor have they zoned in on the one, little-known Midwestern company that holds THE KEY.”

He runs through a bunch of examples of big potential in medicine (diagnosing disease), law (document review), retail (inventory planning), self-driving cars, etc. And then we get more on this catalyst…

“AI Just Got Its BIG Catalyst….

“You see, in order for AI to work, it has to also be able to learn — and ‘retain’ — all the information it gathers and apply this knowledge to new tasks.

“To do that, it needs one thing … A LOT of memory.

“That’s really why AI has been stuck in this range for the last several decades.

“Over the last 30 years, computing power has risen exponentially, as much as a trillion-fold. And the number of internet users has increased 25,000% since 1995, generating quadrillions of bits of data.

“The company that can create a new class of memory — that will power artificial intelligence — will stand to become the most valuable company in the world … because that new class of memory will be the catalyst for AI launching it into mass adoption.

“And today, one company in America’s Midwest has done just that.”

Aha! Now we begin to get some specifics…

“This company is the undisputed leader in memory technology. Their memory chips have been described as ‘the crude oil of the 21st century.’

“… artificial intelligence will soon begin solving major world problems like pollution, disease and hunger. It will also give every business the chance to increase earnings by nearly 50%.

“Which is why I am convinced this Midwestern company is the No. 1 stock you should buy, as AI ignites a $15.7 trillion revolution, surging 76,000%.”

And we get a few clues about large investors in the company:

David Tepper, the highest paid money manager on Wall Street, has dumped 20% of his portfolio into this one stock — a $1.9 billion investment.

“It is the top holding in Vanguard’s popular Selected Value Fund, to the tune of $4.4 billion.”

And some big partners and financial details to throw into the mix:

“This company has already signed a $2.5 billion deal with Apple and an $8 billion deal with Intel. With this latest innovation, it expects its memory business to quickly grow to $62 billion.

“This stock trades at just five times earnings….

“Best of all, you can buy a stake in this company for as little as $50….

“Company earnings are up 94% over the past year. And they’re heading higher.”

While the Thinkolator chugs away on those clues, we’ll note this bit of Mampilly’s opinion for posterity:

“This stock is an absolute bargain at today’s prices.

“If you’re going to invest in any one company the next decade, this company should be it.

“It will be like buying Ford, Microsoft, and AOL … before they surged 250,000%, 105,000%, and 70,000%.”

And…

“Buying this stock today will be like buying Netflix 10 years ago — setting you up for gains of 14,000% or more.”

So who is it? Well, I confess that this was a pretty easy one just going by the clues that were dropped along the way, though after chewing on the Thinkolator’s results for a little while I did waste some time trying to match the photo that Mampilly showed in his demonstration to illustrate that “midwestern company,” just as a bit of final confirmation.

But, the joke’s on me — he apparently just bought a stock photo of a generic suburban office building and used that… maybe it has some relation to the company he’s teasing, but I doubt it. Here’s the image, by the way, I use a stock photo service, too, so I bought a copy of the same photo. I even left the handy canned caption attached. This doesn’t mean anything, but I bought the photo and didn’t want to waste it.

Typical suburban office building, of the type used by high tech companies.

So who is this mysterious company that’s going to be vaulted higher by the rise in demand for memory as the artificial intelligence revolution marches forward? Thinkolator says your initial guess was right, dear friend, this is Micron Technologies (MU), the company that has been among the cheapest mega-chip stocks for a long time now.

Yes, the clues all fit — other than that building photo, which is not a picture of Micron’s headquarters in Boise or any of their other meaningful “midwestern” locations (I’d say Idaho is more western, but Mampilly also teased a Utah company as “midwestern”… so he clearly uses a pretty loose definition of that geographical term.

And I should say that the clues used to fit — they don’t anymore, since the ad hasn’t been updated to reflect changes in reality. David Tepper’s Appaloosa fund did indeed own a ton of Micron shares, worth a bit more than $2 billion, and that was indeed a huge bet — Tepper built this stake over more than two years, and it was about a quarter of his reported 13F portfolio at the peak (hedge funds and other institutional investors don’t have to report the full details of their portfolios, just the US-listed equities). He had just as much trouble picking the right price to pay as the rest of the world, given that he added most quarters from mid-2016 to early 2019 and he almost certainly bought some shares in the teens as well as some in the $50s.

But what has changed since? Tepper sold 95% of his Micron position sometime between April 1 and June 30 of 2019. Presumably at prices somewhere in the $35-40 range. So if it’s his signal you’re following, then you’re not buying here at $48 (I don’t know what his rationale was in selling). And in case you’re curious, that Vanguard mutual fund also sold a bunch of shares — though it’s still a top ten holding of Vanguard Selected Value (a fund that has lagged the market pretty significantly for the past two years).

Chip stocks tend to be prone to big swings of over-investment and supply gluts and technological obsolescence that requires constant, massive capital investment, particularly those who produce a lot of somewhat “standard” or commoditized chips like Micron… so add that together with some freaking out about Chinese tariffs and the stock is now well south of $50 a share and trades at eight times earnings (it was an even more ludicrous 3X earnings a year ago, but earnings have fallen considerably and the price has risen).

So you can pick up Micron shares for about $48 now if you’d like to, which is up pretty nicely from the $35 you would have paid last Halloween when this ad first ran, and analysts are predicting decent profits for the next couple years…. though the predictions now are far lower than analysts had been forecasting in the fall of 2018. At the time the forecast was for roughly $9 a share each year going forward, but analysts now think that earnings, which peaked at $12 a share in 2018 and dropped to $5.67 in the year just completed (their fiscal year ends in August), will be down to $2.50 in this current fiscal year (the one that just started) and rise to $5.35 in 2021 and $7.53 in 2022.

So if the analysts are right that is, indeed, still a compelling valuation — about 20X current earnings and 9X forward earnings… though history tells us that analysts are pretty terrible at forecasting Micron’s earnings (which isn’t their fault, the company is pretty bad at it, too — as you’d expect for a “price taker” company that historically has relied on sales of commodity memory chips).

The overarching concern has been that Micron is at or near the top of the cycle in memory chips, and that looming oversupply is creating another crash in prices… perhaps like the one that saw Micron’s share price fall by about 2/3 from 2014 to 2016, when revenues fell 20% or so. Of course, back then the PE ratio only got down to about five or six, so perhaps we bottomed out last year?

I have no idea, of course. I left my crystal ball in my other pants.

The analysts don’t know, either, even on the top-line stuff — they are supposed to be the experts on the industry and the best at predicting where things will go (stop laughing!) — and in Micron’s case, last year they were predicting stable revenue of between $30-31 billion for the next several years, roughly the same as the company reported in its best four quarters ending in early 2018. Now, those same analysts are predicting that after last year’s disappointing revenue of $23 billion it will fall further still to $21 billion this year, before rising back up to $25 and $28 billion in 2021 and 2022.

It’s worth noting that Micron has no net debt, so there’s no imminent risk of a cash crisis even if earnings fall… so what on earth is it that people don’t like? Is it really just the fear of a cyclical peak, concern about Chinese tariff wars that cause supply chain headaches in the chip sector, or a rising glut in memory chips? Probably mostly the latter, but it’s hard to see inside the head of other investors.

There’s a “Micron has peaked” article from Investorplace here if you’d like a different perspective, and there’s a Motley Fool piece about the recent Intel/Micron divorce in their next-generation memory business and the impact that might have on Micron’s finances (incidentally, that next-generation 3D XPoint memory is what has led some other newsletters to pitch Micron in the past as well… it was even teased as a cryptocurrency play last year).

And yes, artificial intelligence plays heavily into Micron’s future growth plans — like everyone else, they’re aware that faster processing and more storage and faster memory access will increase the demand for artificial intelligence processing in all kinds of devices and industries… and particularly that we’ll need a lot more processing power and memory in more data centers as more of this AI processing moves to the cloud. Though that doesn’t guarantee that the newer, better, stronger memory chips they develop will be adopted fast enough to make up for competitive pressure or falling margins in their core “commodity” memory chip business (supplying DRAM for computer processing memory, NAND chips to replace disk drives for memory storage), but there doesn’t seem to be any reason to expect revenues to crash or the market for memory to disappear… it’s just possible that it will become less profitable as pricing pressure settles in.

Where do I come down? Well, I can’t claim to have any insight into whether the market for commoditized memory chips will rise or fall this year, but everything I read indicates that pricing is falling and estimates are falling for Micron as well as for other memory makers like Seagate (STX) and Western Digital (WDC)… and going from a partnership with Intel to possible competition with Intel over the next year or two doesn’t make your tummy feel great.

But still, a market-dominating company that trades at 3X earnings is soooo cheap that I was somewhat tempted a year ago, and as long as this year is really an earnings trough and they can recover then a forward PE of 9 or so is also pretty compelling… and it’s possible that they can both buy back stock and continue to fight for leadership in next generation memory technologies. Sometimes we underestimate the biggest companies, and Micron is indeed big… their competitors are large, too, from Samsung to the Chinese state-backed emerging giants to Intel, but most of their competitors are huge and diversified… they don’t have any listed competitors who are as tightly focused on memory chips as Micron, and sometimes being big is enough to guarantee survival through the downward cycle in the sector and leadership the next time the cycle turns.

That said, yes, it can obviously still fail — I would have said the same thing in mid-2018 when the stock was near $50 with a P/E ratio of 5, and that would not have stopped the stock from going down 30%. Cheap stocks can get cheaper, because people have a tendency to want to pay for future earnings, not past earnings.

Last year I noted that there were a couple dozen relatively big tech stocks that traded at single-digit P/E ratios and with Price/Sales ratios below 1.5 or so, evidence of the cycle of destruction that comes down on this sector with some regularity as competition and innovation and commodification of products bring down former darlings… AU Optronics and Fujitsu and Hitachi and Seagate and Tower Semiconductor all looked awfully cheap, too, among others… but none of those other important (or formerly important) billion-dollar industry leaders were even close to as cheap as Micron when it comes to earnings multiples, even as the fact that many of them are much, much cheaper when it comes to price/sales measures provides some room for worry about falling margins.

There was an interview with Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra in the Silicon Valley Business Journal around the time this article was originally published, and he summed up the strategy pretty well in this Q&A:

“How do you plan to lead the company’s strategy in areas that may not be as strong? The CPU shortage caused PC makers and customers to pull back a little bit in recent quarters, which was reflected in a weaker outlook by Micron. How do you plan on keeping that strength in areas like that?

“We plan to continue to focus on innovation, in terms of advancing our technology roadmap. Bringing new technologies, new products to market. We really want to continue to strengthen our cost competitiveness, with respect to those products, manufacturing cost structure, as well as continue to evolve our portfolio of solutions toward higher value solutions.

“Whether you look at data centers or you look at autonomous driven vehicles of the future, or you look at the growing needs of mobile, or smartphones — all of these applications are requiring more memory and more storage. All of these applications are also being touched by artificial intelligence and machine learning in one way or another. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are in very, very early stages. We have barely seen the tip of the iceberg there. Fast memory and fast storage, is really the heart of that artificial intelligence evolution and these are the kind of products that Micron makes and will continue to make.”

So sure, I can see why Paul Mampilly was tempted a year ago, and could still be interested today… but I can also see why a lot of people wouldn’t have the stomach to speculate on this one. I’d probably still lean more on the “decent companies with a PE below 5 are probably worth a gamble” side, particularly when the company’s balance sheet looks pretty solid, like Micron’s does… but I don’t have any particular confidence that the stock will recover quickly, or that their next-generation memory products will benefit meaningfully from AI investments in the next year, so I haven’t bought.

Cheap is good, but cheap stocks often test both your stomach and your patience. Micron isn’t likely to generate any big news soon — sentiment can shift anytime, of course, but their next actual earnings release isn’t until December 18… and most of the bellwether semiconductor stocks have already reported for this quarter, so you’ll have to get to big picture guessing if you want to predict how Micron ends this year. Last quarter, Micron disappointed and dropped by 10% in September… but the improved outlook from Intel last week and the more optimistic chatter about the China trade war have probably had a lot to do with it recovering from that drop.

That’s just my thinking, though, and I don’t think I’ve ever owned Micron stock… I certainly haven’t scoured their detailed filings in recent years. Perhaps you’re more informed than I am, or have a perspective to share — if so, I’m sure we’d all be delighted to hear what you think, just share your thoughts with a comment below. We don’t bite.

P.S. Paul Mampilly has definitely had some fans hereabouts in past years, thanks in large part to his teaser pitches for ST Microelectronics in 2016 and Foundation Medicine in 2017, both of which did very well — but opinions change pretty quickly and our readers do always want to hear more, so if you’ve tried out Profits Unlimited, please click here to share your experience with your fellow investors. Thank you!

Disclosure: I own shares and/or call options on Alphabet, Apple and Intel among the companies mentioned above. I will not trade in any covered stock for at least three days, per Stock Gumshoe’s trading rules.

Irregulars Quick Take

Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)
guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

127 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Omhri
Omhri
October 28, 2019 11:41 pm

I thought it was AMD and remember checking this out with them.

Add a Topic
5059
👍 21718
rocko107
October 29, 2019 8:16 am

I got into Micron at $44 about a year ago and sold last week for just shy of 48. I plan to get back in again but I’ll wait for Trumps next tweet about China trade negotiations. This stock has had so many 10%+ swings in the last year I simply decided to get out while I could take a small profit and get back in on the next dip.

Add a Topic
108
👍 15
ARTHUR DAPRATO
Member
ARTHUR DAPRATO
October 29, 2019 9:58 am

I signed up for a Banyan Hill smorgasbord in 2018 for a fair amount of cash. I received almost everything they had in their portfolio including Profits Unlimited and Extreme Fortunes. For the most part I was pleased with the direction and advice given, but since I didn’t have any stock which came close to the 1,000% gains promised , although Tandem Diabetes is up over 300% since I bought in. I took advantage of the guarantee that says if you are not satisfied with the performance of our recommendations, you will receive the next year free. Banyan Hill stood by their word and I am in the second year at no cost. My portfolio is up, so much more than the amount the subscription cost, but I still feel if you’re going to make outlandish claim, you have to back it up. My rule of thumb is if you are promised 1,000% gains, and you spend $2500 on a subscription, then an increase of $25,000 should happen using their stock picks. I’m pretty close to that with recommendations way up on IIPR, LULU, AMD, and CMG, which I sold unfortunately.

Add a Topic
5563
Add a Topic
5274
Add a Topic
5566
R K LAKHOTIA
Guest
R K LAKHOTIA
November 4, 2019 12:22 am

They all are snake oil merchants headed by Kent Moors of Money Press. All have been weeded out. I hope this publishing industry is regulated and they stop promising moon and stars and to bring gullible to their fold. Now I subscribe to five investment letters. Ideas and information is widely available though you have to pay. Some are CNBC, Bloomberg, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal. Investment is worth the payment.

Add a Topic
359
Add a Topic
1567
Add a Topic
6139
Marty Matfess
Guest
Marty Matfess
November 5, 2019 12:19 pm

I joined Profits Unlimited a few years back. When I first began I wanted to see how my results with a service would compare to an ETF tracking just the S&P 500. Doing that, my Profits Unlimited has provided about Double the return of the S&P 500. Real numbers. So although there were no 100% returns, I am pretty happy with the $89 or whatever per year. I’m up about $50k.

So I rolled some of that into a subscription for True Momentum. Same method and I am up about 5x the return on the S&P 500. Again, no 1000% return (so I got a ‘free’ year), but when you are beating the returns of the S&P by a 5 factor, I’m pretty satisfied.

So I got on the bandwagon for his IPO service, which, once I looked at it, decided it was not for me, called Banyon Hill (No refunds), but they gave me 1 year of extreme fortunes. It’s only been a few months, but I am down about $600 v if I had been in the S&P I’d be up $1200. I’d be frustrated, but I really do believe in the 6 stocks he’s added since I’ve joined.

It’s easy to be anonymous and call all of these newsletter guys ‘snake oil salesmen”, but I’ve learned a lot by being in these services, an education about holding onto stock and watching trends that goes beyond just my profits. Those “Earn a Billion Dollars overnight” ads are part of the game I guess, but two years into my association with Mamphilly, I’m definitely richer for the service. Of course, if I had just joined, I might feel differently.

Add a Topic
5274
Add a Topic
900
Mark DeGange
Guest
Mark DeGange
January 14, 2020 10:48 pm

Mampilly may be able to pick winners and sell his subscriptions, but with Micron he got left in the dust. Bill Spetrino (The Great American Dividend Machine) recommended MU back in late May of 2015 in his conservative portfolio at $21.78. I subscribed the next year, waited, watched , and in late July 2016 jumped in at$14.33 and have since held on for close to a 300% gain. Spetrino is brilliant at picking, and wise enough to hold for a while. My strength is waiting and getting in at big dips (still holding CISCO from back in ’11 at $16. )
Spetrino is outspoken, which may turn some off, but he’s the best stock picker I’ve teamed up with. He knows his business, and has no losers in his conservative portfolio.

Add a Topic
2478
Add a Topic
2479
Add a Topic
3963
frank_n_steyn
Irregular
January 30, 2020 10:43 pm

MU is done quite a bit lately, while the index’s are up. No 70,000% increase in price, maybe, just maybe…he was referring to his own personal income growth with expectations of sales to his newsletters.

Add a Topic
3963
Add a Topic
996
👍 471
SPACEYMO
SPACEYMO
March 25, 2020 1:37 pm

is that a crystal ball in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?….EVERYONE EVEN THINKING OF GETTING INTO THE MARKETS, with all the hype out there, NEEDS you! I cant thank you enough for your work, as you’ve rescued me from myself MANY times. I fell victim to Mampilly last year, but I must say he did turn me on to one stock that went through the roof and kept me afloat for the last year and a half as I took my gains to survive. That stock
(IIPR) was a gift so I can’t fault him there…HOWEVER..just the fact that we, your devoted devotees, call upon you to save us from ourselves, says volumes. Yes, if one good stock could carry me, then I am, obviously, a very small potato,.

Add a Topic
5951
👍 2
priscilla Ho
Guest
priscilla Ho
June 11, 2020 12:00 am

Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, October 28, 2019 article
Mampilly is running his old teaser ad again. I was putting the clues together to for his 3 picked companies your article came up! Good job! Nice analysis too. THANK YOU!

Add a Topic
4656
Mitchell Dickerson
Guest
Mitchell Dickerson
June 16, 2020 1:21 pm

I have a theory as to why A.I. will have a tough road to impacting the world the way Mampilly has envisioned and expelled so much breath to convince us was imminent as one company held the key to its rise to the top of all things on earth etc., etc., blah ,blah, blah. Artificial Intelligence has no chance against the Organic Lack of Intelligence that governs this world. Sure, there’s a smart man here and there, and, an intelligent woman can be found ,but, smart people do not exist anymore. I consider myself fairly bright, until you lump me in with the rest of them. It is especially so in the ranks of government. That is where the worst kind of stupid people are making the decisions the rest of us endure. Stupidity that is convinced that it is smarter than everyone else. They have the diplomas that prove nothing, but, the fact that they opened more textbooks than others. What is lacking,[besides humility, apathy, and other things not related to intellect] is something that can’t be learned, nor, taught. Can’t be sold or bought. You either have it , or, you have it not. Common sense is what is needed more than anything in this world today. Common courtesy, and common decency would follow. But, since it would be inhumane to disallow people to procreate if their I.Q. fell below a certain standard, the average I.Q. of every nation of the world has been plummeting for centuries. The good news is that the downward trend is leveling off. Bad news is I’m afraid it only hit the’ stupid as it gets rock bottom’ , is the reason why.

Steve
Guest
Steve
September 20, 2020 4:08 am

Keep moving West..and check out STT in California..looks like that might be it.

Susie
Susie
January 6, 2021 6:36 pm

MU has had a nice climb. Travis, how do you deal with the idea that a stock doesn’t look like a buy and then onward and upward it goes?

Add a Topic
3963

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
34
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x