“Hillary Clinton — Best President Ever?” (Deciphering Matt Badiali’s oil stock teaser pitch)

by Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe | October 22, 2014 4:02 pm

Looking at the stocks teased by S&A Resource Report's "The Absolute Best Way to Invest in America’s Tight Oil Boom" pitch

Matt Badiali and the folks at Stansberry Research are very skilled at using the names of politicians to inspire visceral reactions in readers and get them to read their ads or listen to their sales pitch presentations.

Which is, of course, the point — and it doesn’t even really matter which politician’s name they use, as long as it’s polarizing and it gets attention. They probably lean a bit to the right in trying to scare us about liberal politicians, since they know that the core audience for investment newsletters are old rich white guys who have a decent amount of money, which itself is a group that leans right, but over the years they’ve been perfectly willing to get your attention by slamming George Bush or Mitt Romney as well.

This time around, it’s Hillary Clinton — and Matt Badiali’s pitch gets our attention by saying that she’ll got down in history as the Best President Ever.

Which is quite a prediction to make, even before she has declared her candidacy for an election that’s two years away, but you read this far… right?

The real claim they’re making — and they’ve been doing this for years — is that whichever politician is running the show when America pushes past the tipping point into dramatic growth and prosperity because of our increasing oil production will be called the “best president ever”… it’s just that Hillary Clinton is the current frontrunner. Matt Badiali’s boss, Porter Stansberry, made similar arguments a couple years ago in saying that Obama will get a third term and a glorious legacy because of LNG exports[1].

It’s not that these politicians mean much to the argument, just that saying something inflammatory about them will get your attention…. so we’ll drop Secretary Clinton for now and get to the actual point of the ad… which is that Matt Badiali wants you to subscribe to his S&A Resource Report, and if you do he’ll send you a special report about the stocks you should buy to benefit from the huge production of shale oil/tight oil and the coming “Reckoning Day” when the real focus turns from importing oil into America to exporting it out.

Then we get a dozen pages of argument about how shale oil is huge and important, and the volumes produced are ridiculous, and no one really gets it yet — that may be true, though Americans are certainly noticing now that gasoline is tickling $3 a gallon again, but I know you get it. Investors have been slobbering over Bakken and Eagle Ford oil for years now… so what are the investments Badiali is teasing? In his words:

“One thing I believe you absolutely must do is own what I know to be the five (5) best tight oil boom companies in America.

“The best companies to own right now are smaller names that have perfectly positioned themselves on the eve of America’s Reckoning Day.

“These are little-known giants whose equipment, technologies, expertise, and resources EVERYONE in this space uses…

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...

“Their services will become more and more critical in the months to come. And their revenues will continue to skyrocket.”

So that’s the basic spiel — what are the actual stocks he’s recommending? We get a few clues about several of them, so we’ll just run through ’em in order:

“For example, one of these five companies invests more money each year in Research & Engineering than all other oilfield services combined.

“I’d argue that the oil boom could not have happened so quickly and so efficiently without the services this company provides…everything from “dirty hands” stuff like pumping and storage to “clean hand” stuff like imaging and data processing. All the big oil companies call this firmto get a job done, and it’s a stock you absolutely must have in your portfolio.”

That one is almost certainly Schlumberger (SLB), the oil services giant that has a hand in almost everything. Hard to argue against this one, which gets touted every now and then, it’s the real blue chip (possibly accompanied by Halliburton) in the oil service space globally. Other than the depths of the financial crisis, SLB hasn’t traded at a PE below 16 in 20 years — so while it’s not cheap with a PE of about 17-18 right now, it is close to as cheap as this stock typically gets. And they have become an excellent dividend growth stock over the past decade, quadrupling the payout over that time — though, like most dividend growth stocks, the current yield is not high at about 1.7%.

SLB is a mega cap company, with a market cap of about $125 billion, and it is very much exposed to investment by oil companies, so it’s no surprise that they have taken a bit of a hit as oil prices dropped in recent months, but they are not direct producers — falling oil prices definitely hurt their business, but they don’t hit the bottom line directly. And yes, they say they spend more on Research and Engineering than all the other oil services companies put together — but they’re also larger than Halliburton (HAL), Baker Hughes (BHI), Weatherford (WFT), Cameron (CAM) and National Oilwell Varco (NOV) combined. If you want oil services, it’s hard to argue against SLB as the most “blue chip” name available in that space — particularly if you can buy it in a downtrend — but it’s unlikely to provide massive overnight gains even if oil spikes considerably.

“Another one of the ‘5 Best’ companies is about to close a deal that will make it the number one oil producer in the Bakken region – the largest oil field in the continental United States. The company will soon operate an area of land larger than the entire state of Rhode Island. Again – this is a company you want to own.”

This one is Whiting Petroleum (WLL), which made a deal to acquire Kodial Oil & Gas (KOG) back in July — that deal, assuming it’s approved when shareholders vote in early December (seems likely to me — the big shareholders are already backing the deal), will indeed create the largest producer in the Bakken and it’s expected to boost Whiting’s production by about 50% next year, in addition to giving it access to KOG’s large inventory of drilling locations.

This kind of deal makes sense to me for what is, in effect, an industrial operation — the Bakken guys aren’t really explorers anymore, they’re engineers who are trying to make production as efficient as possible, and having a larger operation can help with that. I don’t know if it will work out or not — investors reacted favorably to the deal after it was announced, but, as with all other oil stocks, they punished the stocks this Fall so both stocks are down by about 30% in the last few months. There was a bit of chatter about the deal being “too expensive” for Whiting, and it does increase their debt as they assume Kodiak’s debentures — but it’s an all-stock deal, so the deal is effectively getting “cheaper” as the price of WLL falls (investors are assuming the deal will close — KOG shareholders will get 0.177 shares of WLL, and that’s within 1% of where KOG is trading now).

The companies we can most easily compare Whiting to are probably Continental Resources (CLR) and EOG (EOG) — Whiting is quite a bit cheaper than both of them by most measures, and it’s likely to have substantially more revenue growth than either thanks to the Kodiak deal… though whether that revenue growth turns into earnings per share growth for the new, larger company depends a lot on how efficiently they integrate their new acquisition and on where the oil price is in 2015.


“I’ve also found the company who operates the largest fleet of power drilling rigs in the world… this special type of rig provides accurate control of both speed and torque. It’s the luxury car of drilling rigs and everyone wants to use it for their projects.”

Thinkolator sez this is: Helmerich and Payne (HP)

HP is one of the big drilling rig operators, and they are said to have the most advanced power drilling rigs — I don’t know if that’s true or not, or what the distinction between them and their closest competitors might be, but I do like what the company has done over the past year… they’ve become an aggressive dividend growth company, so the yield is now over 3% and they have a payout ratio (the percentage of earnings paid out as dividends) that is still pretty low, in the 30% range. That looks pretty appealing.

Like most of the drilling contractors, they likely had a rough couple of years as natural gas prices dramatically cut demand for drilling equipment — so investors are probably wise to be concerned about where their revenues go if oil prices keep dropping, but with oil at $80 there sure won’t be much of a slowdown in the Bakken, Permian or Eagle Ford so that just means that, as usual, the direct drilling operators like HP, or like the fracking pressure pumping companies who ran through a boom and bust cycle in recent years, will probably continue to be pretty directly levered to oil and gas prices.

If I had to buy a driller, HP would be a good place to start research and I like the current valuation and the newfound focus on returning cash to shareholders — but, like pretty much any name in this space, if you had a 25% stop loss in place and owned the stock in July, you would have sold it by last week.

One more:

“Then, there’s probably my most important recommendation… this company is the largest independent refiner in the United States.

“Remember, our refining capabilities in the U.S. are growing more dire by the day – but this company recently invested more than $700 million in two of their Texas refineries to take on even more tight oil.”

Well, that has to be Valero (VLO). Refiners have been doing pretty well over the last year, especially those who have the best access to mid-continent oil or who have easy export capabilities (refiners have been the only outlet for our surplus in recent years — exporting crude oil is illegal, but exporting gasoline is allowed… refiners can process cheaper WTI Crude int gasoline or diesel or other products and ship those refined products to people in Europe or Asia who are used to prices based on the higher Brent Crude price). Generally speaking, refiners are a good place to be when crude oil prices are falling, since crude oil is their input cost and the prices of refined products (like gasoline at the pump) tend to move more slowly than the price of oil… especially when they’re falling.

There are several large refinery stocks — HollyFrontier (HFC) is probably the most expensive, perhaps because it pays huge dividends (7%+ thanks to special dividends) and Valero is both the biggest and the cheapest by most measures and has been growing its own dividend since 2010 for a current yield of about 2.5% (others to maybe look at, by way of comparison, are Tesoro (TSO), Western Refining (WNR) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC)… or the high-yielding and riskier MLP Northern Tier Energy (NTI), which owns a single refinery in Minnesota and the string of SuperAmerica gas station/convenience stores).

Everything in this space is being MLP-ified (assets being spun off to master limited partnerships to create tax pass-through ownership and appeal to dividend investors), and most of the refiners have jumped on that movement, too, even if only to own their pipeline networks — Valero has one of those, in case you’re looking, in Valero Energy Partners (VLP). Doesn’t yield any more than the parent at this point, but I haven’t looked very closely at the relationship.

And… that’s all we get. So there are four of the five — what’s missing? We don’t get any clues, but I’d imagine it’s probably either a pipeline MLP, an oil-by-rail company, or a refined products tanker company, since “transport” is somewhat missing in this spiel otherwise. That’s just a guess, if you have a favorite stock to throw out in that area, or any opinions about these four stocks touted by Badiali, well, I’d love to hear your thoughts if you’ll share them using the friendly little comment box below.

Disclosure: Of the stocks mentioned above, I currently own shares of National Oilwell Varco. I won’t trade in any of the stocks mentioned for at least three days because of Stock Gumshoe’s trading restrictions.

Have you checked out Robinhood yet? Free trading is great for investors just starting out... plus You and I can each earn a free share of stock right now if you open an account![2]

  1. similar arguments a couple years ago in saying that Obama will get a third term and a glorious legacy because of LNG exports: http://www.stockgumshoe.com/reviews/porter-stansberrys-investment-advisory/obamas-third-term-stansberrys-secret-plan-to-retain-power-through-2020/
  2. You and I can each earn a free share of stock right now if you open an account!: https://join.robinhood.com/travisj369

Source URL: https://www.stockgumshoe.com/reviews/s-a-resource-report/hilary-clinton-best-president-ever-deciphering-matt-badialis-oil-stock-teaser-pitch/

  1. Avatar
    Oct 22 2014, 04:57:58 pm

    Maybe Dakota Plains Holdings, Inc. (DAKP), an oil-by-rail company. I don’t own any stock in the company but it’s on my watch list.

  2. Avatar
    Oct 22 2014, 05:29:47 pm

    My guess is Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) with a hand in many facets, including pipelines and refining. Nice growing yield and highly rated among the MLP space. Disclosure:Long ETP

    • 12862 |
      Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
      Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
      Oct 22 2014, 05:58:18 pm

      It’s fallen lower than I expected, and I continue to think it will recover over the next 18 months and sustain the dividend… But if oil stays below $80 (Brent, not just WTI) the future looks a lot less bright for ultra-deepwater, which is where their strength is.

      • 15 |
        Mark Wojnarowicz
        Oct 22 2014, 08:40:00 pm

        Agree. Bought in too high, tried the put option route at too high a price, but think it is a long term hold. Let the dividends compound and am considering a second purchase to dollar cost average into this one.

  3. Avatar
    David Talcott
    Oct 22 2014, 05:38:35 pm

    Energy Transfer Partners ETP seems to be a good MLP. Haven’t evaluated cost ratios though. Owned earlier this year but got scared out by the oil price drop. Would enjoy your opinion.

  4. 1235 |
    Casey West
    Oct 22 2014, 05:39:09 pm

    Overall, do you or don’t you think it’s a good time to buy oil stocks?? They are very tempting now bc of the falling prices. One would think they can only go up from here. Right?
    Do you think they will fall more, or should we be buying now?

    WWTD (what would Travis do) ??

    • 12862 |
      Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
      Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
      Oct 22 2014, 06:00:37 pm

      Wish I knew. If global growth doesn’t pick up, the big supply increases are going to continue to pressure prices. To see what happens when demand dries up because the economy slows, just look at 2008/2009. I don’t expect that again, but I didn’t expect it last time, either.

      • 7785
        Oct 22 2014, 06:40:36 pm

        My thinking is that “old oil” established wells with low cost production will continue to do well but it looks like OPEC has decided to drive price down to shut down higher price producers,,,,Tight oil,,shale in thin strata,,etc. I really cannot see any viable substitute for
        Gasoline/diesel in longer range vehicles. Local is starting to switch to NG. I think
        refineries may be worth looking at. Weight of containment tanks for hydrogen seems to be uneconomic for airplanes,,,,,,time to revisit Zeppelins?

  5. Avatar
    John Harris
    Oct 22 2014, 05:46:17 pm

    Other than short term, like perhaps pipeline MLP’s the oil patch scares me long term. Sure right now some short term buying of these recently crashed prices might make sense but I would put in those stops for the longer term. After all the world is pulling more and more oil (and gas) out of the earth at a greatly accelerating rate with new finds virtually all over the globe. You don’t have to drill 5 miles deep in the ocean anymore. That great find off Brazil in very deep water was all the rage to pump up the stock of Petrobras the Brazil oil giant just a couple of years ago and it has crashed from $68 down below $13 (and yes I still hold that unfortunately). And all the while in developed nations more efficient cars are reducing demand. Granted that is not yet true in developing nations, but the pressure is toward reduced demand while we have more supply. Then let climate change actually start pressuring change and we could see either a tax on carbon lower demand further or just a desire to use hydrogen (from water using nuclear electricity) to power all our cars and trucks and planes to reduce CO2 emissions as just the right thing to do for the planet. Well that is long term but to me I don’t like those long term prospects for oil or most of the stocks in that patch.

  6. Avatar
    Jim Wood
    Oct 22 2014, 06:00:39 pm

    If you were to list all those Presidents that you thought were “great,” and maybe you even pick one that was “best,” and if you were to list your reasons, how many of the Presidents would be “great” because of “outstanding economic growth”? And what about the one you chose as “best”?

  7. 1296
    Oct 22 2014, 09:09:42 pm

    Ive followed Matt for over two years……and lost a great deal of money due to sell stops, this past 6 months has been terrible. These are his recommendation buys for Oct . Please Gummies, let me know if sharing info like this is a no_no?
    Whiting Petroleum (WLL)
    Plains All American (PAA)
    CVR Refining (CVRR)
    Regency Energy Partners (RGP) 
    World Point Terminals (WPT)
    OCI Resources (OCIR)
    Terra Nitrogen (TNH)
    Compressco Partners (GSJK)
    Regency Energy Partners (RGP) 

    • Avatar
      Oct 23 2014, 08:01:46 pm

      I like to here what other people are buying, so keep it coming. I am short a few SDS, TBT< SJB, QID, BIS and GASL just made money to.

    • 67 |
      John Watson
      Oct 24 2014, 03:06:44 am

      Much as I dislike many of these newsletter purveyors, I don’t think it’s fair to directly republish their recommendations (guessing what they are from the pitches is a different thing, of course). I wonder if there are even some legal issues – check the fine print!

      • 12862 |
        Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
        Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe
        Oct 24 2014, 11:45:36 am

        I agree with the spirit of what you’re saying — that’s why I don’t just subscribe to 100 newsletters and share the tickers they recommend, that wouldn’t be sporting… but it would probably be legal. They’re also simply paid subscription publications, not different in legal terms than a magazine or a newspaper, you cannot copy and redistribute their work but you also can’t expect a legal veil of genuine “secrecy”.

        Copyright applies to physically (including online) copying work and/or redistributing it, not to referencing the content of the work — you cannot copyright an idea or a stock pick or ticker symbol, just the manifestation of that idea…. so you copyright the essay you publish about something in your newsletter, and outside of fair use that can’t be copied and shared, but you can’t copyright the fact that you’re writing about something or the name of the stock you’re writing about. (And no, you don’t have to register or somehow officially make a claim to have copyright over the work you create — it’s owned by the author/publisher by default.)

        That doesn’t mean there mightn’t be some attempt at a “secrecy” pact in the “terms of use” for a newsletter or a website — though putting legal teeth behind that seems very unlikely to me.

        I think about these things a lot, for obvious reasons, and was formerly an academic who worked a lot on copyright issues, but I’m not a lawyer — that’s just my attempted explanation of an area of interest that remains intentionally imprecise.

  8. Avatar
    quincy adams
    Oct 22 2014, 09:48:31 pm

    I must confess I don’t know the shale drillers from a hole in the ground. For anyone looking for price appreciation, I’d recommend XLE…the “all things oil&gas” ETF. If you’re looking for yield (I am), SDRL looks very tempting at Brent crude less than $80 or SDRL less than $20. My sort of 80/20 rule. And if anyone happens to be talking to Mr. Badiali, please mention that my niece is way ahead of him, driving with a “Ready for Hillary” bumper sticker.

  9. Avatar
    Al Qayoom
    Oct 22 2014, 09:54:53 pm

    Travis, you mentioned LVLEF some time ago. It’s around 71cents now and has some great acerage in the Permian. Also another Canadian company is PTAXF which is drilling in Colombia. I’ve been buying both as they have little or no debt and low costs.

  10. 737 |
    Oct 25 2014, 07:28:41 pm

    To John Watson ref #8: While I understand you point of view, I must say that the unfairness would be IMO towards those who have paid for the services as opposed to the publisher / publishing house. The publisher may benefit indirectly via a few ways (free advertising if the picks are good, more people piling into the stocks raising the s/p etc…). Of course, none of this quantifiable so who knows?

    Gumshoe has a great system here and we are all thankful.

  11. Avatar
    vivian lewis
    Oct 26 2014, 10:56:55 am

    Here is a beneficiary of low crude prices, apart from those who need to fill up their gas
    tanks to live (I don’t; I live in Manhattan). Airlines.
    The Lewis seniors (me and my husband) have just booked ourselves a flight to London
    for Xmas Business Class via City Airport in London, which is very near our base at
    Mudchute Manor. We never could afford this level of British Airways flight before,
    being mere journalists. Now we can! Moreover there are delicious cheapo deals on
    the internet and the newspapers for flying to Paris or Tel Aviv, also well below what
    we normally would have to shell out. The reason: fuel costs are down sharply.
    Fly now; pay later

What These Icons Mean