This ad is being heavily pitched again, the emails for this ad now open with lines like “We recently discovered a strange website” and “invest in little-known $25 investment notes that pay interest rates as high as 28.99%.”
The ad itself is unchanged from when it first started running a little over a month ago, this article is unchanged from when it was published on September 24, 2015.
We’ve had a few questions about this teaser pitch, so although it’s not exactly about a stock I thought we’d dig into it a bit today.
And heck, I even decided to offer myself up as a guinea pig to see how it works and what the real-world experience of a small investor is with these “Retirement Notes”…. But more on that in a minute.
Ryan Cole at Unconventional Wealth often tries to pitch things that at least sound, well, unconventional…. like the variable indexed annuities he pitched as “Franklin IRAs” and “Secret Vatican Accounts”the “Queen’s Shocking Private Account” earlier this year.
And this is, like those, an “outside the market” way to earn income — with the carefully worded implication that “$25 notes” can turn into monthly payouts of thousands of dollars.
Here’s some of the tease:
“I recently heard about a strange website that lets you invest in ‘retirement notes’ that pay interest rates as high as 28.99%.
“At first, I thought this had to be a scam of some sort.
“Little did I know… it was about to change everything I knew about investing.”
Exciting, right?
So what are these “retirement notes?” Here’s more from the ad:
“The really groundbreaking part is that since their inception, serious investors have enjoyed 99.9% reliable returns from these notes.
“You can’t get that kind of security from stocks… not by a longshot.
“Once I discovered these notes, I had to know more.
“So I decided to launch a full-blown, 7-month investigation…
“I called up a company that provides these notes… I devoured articles, statistics, and every bit of research I could find.
“More important, I found dozens of real people who are investing real money in these notes and seeing incredible gains. (You’ll hear some of their stories in just a minute.)
“Of course, as with any investment opportunity, there is still an element of risk. But after you see some of the extraordinary returns I discovered, I bet you’ll agree—the potential here is staggering.
“I’m 100% convinced these notes could be the solution to baby boomers who are struggling to get retirement income.”
Well, the 99.9% number sound pretty good… though “99.9% reliable” is technically different from “guaranteed” — some more clues?
“How Mike Made $76,049 in Just 9 Months From These Notes
Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...“One of the first investors I met was Mike M., from Florida. His results were so incredible that I had to call him to make sure they were real.
“When he told me about his background, I quickly realized he wasn’t some kid off the block who falls for fads or scams.
“Mike is a serial entrepreneur who has worked on Wall Street, built his own venture capital fund and started his own tech companies.
“As a private equity investor, Mike tends to hear about innovations way before the general public does.
“… he started investing in these notes in November 2013. He even shared his bank statement with me….
“… Mike was getting thousands of dollars deposited into his bank account every month… like clockwork….
“I remember thinking to myself, “With such high returns, these notes have to be risky.”
“But when I asked Mike about it, he made a shocking revelation.
“He told me: ‘I have NEVER lost money. My account has gone up every single month.’
“That word ‘NEVER’ rung in my ears. It’s not something you hear often in the investment world.”
OK, so don’t overreact to that “Never” bit — if he started investing in these “retirement notes” in 2013, that means he’s been doing this for less than two years. That’s a blink of an eye, there are lots and lots and lots of investments that have “never” lost money over a two-year period — particularly if you get to choose the two-year period when selecting examples to use for your ad.
Some more about these “retirement notes?” Here’s a bit about the founder of a company that offers them:
“Ronald Lester, a serial entrepreneur and former Wall Street attorney, came up with an ingenious solution.
“He developed a revolutionary website that connects investors directly with borrowers, cutting the banks out of the equation.
“Mr. Lester had long been frustrated with the low interest rate he was getting from his bank.
“He noticed the ‘spread’ between the 1.5% interest on earnings from his “high yield” certificate of deposit and the massive 18% rate his credit card company was charging him may have been great for greedy lenders… but terrible for consumers like you and me.
“He realized that removing the banks from the equation would allow everyday Americans to collect much higher interest.
“Since then $25 ‘retirement notes’ have been growing steadily in popularity.
“When you buy a ‘retirement note,’ you’re essentially providing funds to someone who is looking for credit.
“Consumers asking for loans are put through a rigorous credit-verification process… income, credit-worthiness and dozens of other factors are taken into account and bad credit risks are screened out before you ever lend money.
“In exchange, you have the potential to collect a very high yield… as high as 28.99%.
“This allows everyday investors to literally ‘become the bank’… but without all the regulatory hassles and capital requirements that real banks have to put up with.
“And because you don’t have to loan out the entire amount… you can buy a fraction for as little as $25… you can spread the risk among thousands of notes so it’s much safer.”
So that’s a veiled reference to the founder of LendingClub, the largest of the so-called “peer to peer lenders” — his name is actually Renaud Laplanche (ad copywriters use these same-initials pseudonyms all the time), and Lending Club went public last year and got a lot of attention, eclipsing slightly earlier pioneers in the sector like Prosper. Lending Club is not so much a peer-to-peer lender as it is a direct syndicator of loans, most investors aren’t actually reading the story about each individual they’re lending to or evaluating them based on whether they’re a firefighter with children who needs a new truck or a college student with too much credit card debt, and they have an application process that’s not necessarily radically different from applying for a bank loan, but they do accept risky borrowers, using their proprietary risk analysis (and charge them higher interest), and they do break up their loans into smaller chunks — as small as $25.
Investors who want to buy those loans, which includes banks and institutional investors as well as individuals, can either select their own individual loans as they become available (at least a few hundred loans post every day for funding — often many more) or set up a programmatic investing program that gives Lending Club the authority to invest their money into a constantly rolling-over portfolio that matches some kind of risk profile you approve. To get expected yields of much over 10-12%, you’d have to cherry pick the riskiest loans either from their initial offerings of higher risk loans, or on their secondary markets (I know LendingClub works with a trading platform to buy and sell loans, haven’t checked to see whether others have similar offerings).
Prosper is essentially the same as LendingClub, also offering tiers of investments for prospective lenders, and allowing you to diversify across dozens or hundreds of loans automatically by choosing your “sweet spot” of risk and reward, and the numbers are pretty similar — Prosper’s best borrowers might qualify for a one-year 5.99% loan (the rate goes up to 36% for riskier first-time borrowers), and loans they sell to investors range from an expected return of 5.5-11.5% based on their “seasoned” data for borrowers across the risk spectrum. The returns for the different risk buckets for those two lending companies are almost identical.
LendingClub does say that 99.9% of their lenders who are diversified across at least 100 loans make money (which would mean you need $2,500 to start) — not that those 99.9% get their anticipated average return of 6% or 8% or whatever their risk bucket selection tells them to expect, but that they don’t lose money. Prosper, similarly, says that since 2009 100% of their lenders who have at least 100 loans have made money. These loans are largely for stuff like credit card refinancing, and it’s probably worth noting that over the last five years the rate of serious credit card delinquencies has also been trending down pretty steadily — with employment improving, I guess there haven’t been all that many people who had to look at their bills and decide whether to skip a credit card payment, a car payment or a LendingClub payment each month.
Both of these, and they’re the two biggest and longest-established lenders of the sort that I’m aware of, have been around for less than 10 years — including through the 2008 downturn when unemployment skyrocketed and their defaults were likely quite high. They say that this experience of 2007 and 2008 has helped them to improve their algorithms for setting interest rates, judging creditworthiness, etc., but we’re still talking about a very short period of time, and most of their borrowers and lenders have come on board over the last few years, when the economy has mostly been just fine and interest rates very low.
It’s a bit risky to guess what might happen to the marketplace over the next few years or decades, but so far it’s been working out pretty well for investors — they get a fairly stable income stream, no recent serious risk of principal loss on the better loans, and a dramatically higher interest rate than they’d earn with (much more secure and/or insured) 3-5 year investments in Treasury Notes or bank CDs (even a 5-year jumbo CD with a $100,000 requirement will only get you slightly over 2% today, 5-year Treasuries are at 1.5%).
And, of course, the big numbers in the ad make it sound a lot more compelling than saying “your $25 note will earn you 12 cents a month!” It’s always important to think about the capital you have to risk to earn the huge returns they’re teasing — and in this case, they also talk a lot about returns in the high teens that are probably not even worth shooting for… yes, it’s possible to build portfolios earning 15%+ on LendingClub or on Prosper or similar platforms, but those portfolios are going to have much higher default risk than the portfolios that are expected to yield 6-8%.
What would it take to turn a $25 “Retirement Note” into, say, a million dollars generating income (without touching principal) of about $60,000 a year under this kind of scenario? Well, with the 5.9% expected return of the “A and B weighted” automatic investment plan they offer, which means you buy mostly highly rated loans, it would take buying one of those $25 “notes” every day, seven days a week, for 35 years to get to that level. That’s an investment of $175 a week, or about $9,100 a year.
To get the much higher returns teased in the ad you have to both invest a much larger amount up front and take on much more “credit risk” by focusing on the lower-grade borrowers. That gets you away from the “this has made money for 99.9% of the people” history and into the realms where the high interest rate earned on the loans (20-25%) is matched by a very high chargeoff rate (10-15%) to accommodate the much larger number of people who aren’t expected to actually keep current on these loans. Someone earning $7,000 a month, like the examples in Coles’ ad, would have to invest $1.5 million to get that rate if they’re sticking to the “good credit weighted” projected returns of 5.9%, or about $1 million if they’re pushing to the other end of the credit spectrum and projecting an 8.1% yield. Or, of course, they’d have to be taking principal out each month when the notes mature, not just earnings (each loan is either for three years or five years, so if you have hundreds of $25 notes they’re constantly maturing and rolling over into new loans).
So no, there’s no free lunch where you can earn 15% interest without taking on genuinely substantial risk — rates are low all around… even the average credit card has a lower interest rate than that unless you have truly terrible credit, and there are obviously costs to be incurred in offering and distributing credit cards and in writing off bad debts. Your risk assessment of individual borrowers may be different, or your risk tolerance may be much higher and perhaps you’re willing to gamble a bit more to earn a higher return… and you could earn a higher return if you cherry pick high-yielding loans from a platform like Lending Club (or Prosper, or one of the other smaller companies), but that does mean you should be prepared for more risk of real capital loss.
The biggest mitigation for that risk is diversification — and there you have to have some faith in the platform to believe that lending $25 each to 50 people is much less risky than lending $1,250 to a single person. I think it obviously is, and that diversification is a “free lunch” of sorts, since it substantially reduces your risk of losing a large portion of your investment, but it doesn’t take away all risk of loss… particularly because they’re diversifying across a pool of borrowers who were all selected in the same way, and who may or may not be diversified geographically, or by whatever other criteria you might consider. They’re diversified just by the fact that they’re different people, so hopefully they won’t all have a medical emergency that drives them into bankruptcy, or get laid off, but they might all be exposed to very similar macroeconomic forces.
None of the peer-to-peer or social or “crowd” lending platforms are insured, to my knowledge. There is a risk, just like when you buy a corporate bond, that any one of these loans could go bad and be worth zero. If you’re lending $25 each to 50 people and expecting 6% returns, then that’s $75 in annual income from that group for yoru $1,250 investment. Three defaults, which means that 6% of the people you lend to can’t pay back the loan in any given year, and your income could be gone. If 10% of the people default, five loans, you’re losing money that year even if the other 45 loans stay current.
And your money is effectively tied up in these loans, though you can also sign up for the FolioFN trading platform at LendingClub and buy and sell loans instead of just investing in new loans and holding through the full term — there’s very likely the potential to do both much better or much worse by trading these loans than you would from just buying new loans and holding them, but if you’re an active lender you could also get in the habit of, say, selling (probably at a loss) loans where the borrower’s credit score drops or when they’ve made a late payment. I can’t imagine myself wanting to monitor 100 or 500 tiny $25 loans, or to even want to get into selecting individual loans, but presumably most of their lenders use their automatic management systems to maintain portfolios. You also take on some interest rate risks, since if rates do surge substantially higher over the next three or five years your returns from the loans you fund today would seem much less impressive (and if you had to sell those loans, you’d be taking a haircut to do so).
So how does this work in practice? I’m going to check it out and see, and I’ll report back on how it’s going from time to time to the Irregulars — I signed up for an account at LendingClub to be a lender, and funded it with a very small amount of money, the minimum to set up a diversified portfolio, so when that funding goes through I’ll have some idea of how they allocate the investment and, over the next month or so, what the returns are initially. The actual account setup was easy, and I have no interest in taking outsize risks so I chose the automatic investment strategy that weights the portfolio substantially toward low-risk and anticipates roughly 6% returns.
I did also try out a lending account a Prosper a few years ago, but that was in their very early days when their criteria and system were quite a bit different, and the account (it was only $100 or something like that, not diversified) was at least cut in half by a default or two in 2008 (my memory is not that good and I haven’t checked the specifics)…. the direct lenders have all come a long way since then, and that experience isn’t probably indicative of what larger, diversified accounts with Prosper might have earned, but above-average yields always bring at least some risk — whether it’s just the risk of something new and not well understood, or the risk that they’re taking a chance of screwing things up and people might lose money, remains to be seen… and I would expect it’s probably going to take another recession and a jump in unemployment to really test these lenders.
If you’ve tried out any of the peer-to-peer or social lending platforms, feel free to share your experience with a comment below — I’m willing to tinker, particularly because they make it so easy to diversify very widely across loans now, but I’m holding on to some small sliver of skepticism that their long-term returns on 3-year and 5-year loans can consistently remain 3X higher than CD rates without substantially higher risk.
We have accounts at both Prosper and lending Club. The account at Lending Club is $4500 and is returning a 10.9% annual rate net of charge offs. At present we have 110 loans and invest in mostly B and C quality paper in $25 or $50 increments. Interestingly enoughg, C paper has outperformed B fo us.
Have been a subscriber to LendingClub for slightly less than 2 years. Numbers from my report today: account value a little over $1300, Interest received slightly over $120 (exclusive of returned principal), and the Adjusted Net Annualized Return a little more than 4.5%. Was introduced to the entity by Dennis Miller who runs an advisory newsletter, and is affiliated with Casey Research. Fund the account monthly, and recently raised my request to be placed with the higher returns. Feel the company is legitimate, but the returns are not close to the maximum they mention.
Hi My name is Kevin Mckeller im tryin to get start .Whats my first step and how much do I need?
I’m currently invested in the Lending Club with about 75% of my $7500 invested in A, B or C loans and have earned 12.6% in about 6 months. (The expected return for my risk level is 5.5 – 8.3%). Although there is one $25 loan currently in its’ grace period, there have been no defaults on any of my other loans. I realize that this method is not without risk, but compared to the pitiful returns on CDs or Savings accounts, the returns outweigh the risks, at least for me.
cderbo
Seems like there are easier and less risky ways to make 6% on your money but it is kind of the new thing.
There are plenty of ways to get a 6% income yield in the market, whether from lower-rated bonds or from dividend-paying stocks or similar vehicles, but they come with probably more volatility and risk to principal than the metrics LendingClub is suggesting will apply to their lenders. For bonds, you have to either go pretty far down the credit scale to BBB borrowers to get 5-6% for 3-5 years, or if you go much further out in the calendar (20-30 years) you can get yields like that from higher-rated corporates or municipal bonds if you want to take on that longer-term interest rate risk.
The real question, over time, is whether the good-credit Lending Club portfolios will really pay off with extremely high safety rates through a bad economy — I get the feeling that some investors are using these as replacements for CDs, since the marketing material makes them look very steady with their claims of 99.9% or 100% “success” over the last few years, but hopefully they’re also being mindful of the potential non-CD-like risk.
Adjusted Net Annualized Return 6.42%
Understanding Your Returns
Adjusted Account Value $8,697.47
Available Cash $367.67
Interest Received $4,452.83
I have belonged to LendingClub for a number of years as has two of my adult children. Initially I had selected moderate risk and had returns approaching 8 to 9 percent. However, as time passed, more defaults occurred eventually giving me the returns noted above [the ave return has been coming down slowly] (my “investment” was around 5K over a year or so time). Due to the fact that “harder” times may be ahead for the average person (borrower), I have decided to start withdrawing – – but noting that the loans are mostly for 2 to 3 years, the withdrawal will take some time).
From the history at lendingclub, I Started in 11/7/2010
Larry, good day to you,the success rates are thy higher? then loss ? when using Gov loans? Or city loans. Larry I am thinking of staying with gov loans and State Loans real state loan in a secure way of thinking. Go no personal loan for five year. To force on let your gov loans grow, state loans get bigger offering good incentive like $300 on discounts dinners, to stay up to date on love one sendoutcarsds.com in order to offer incentive fun-id what your clients need are. You send a post card to your clients in offing free gifts. When thy pay there loans on time like a new I tuns, Tow year ago I had a insurances company send me a gift, the words on the card way’s a Thank you for your business. In order to get this in incentive’s you would pay $100 . To give way vacations, see you accessed in keep clients, up to day with clients payment. The more you give the more you get back. Business relationship that what your building. It really good to know some real good Doctor good investments. Just Some I deals
WELL FROM WHAT I HAVE BEEN READING, THE WHOLE ECONOMY IS GOING TO CRASH. BANKS, HOMES, LOSS OF 30-60% OF YOUR MONEY IN THE BANK WILL BE TAKEN. NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO AFFORD A LOAN. THE EQUITY ON YOUR HOME WILL DROP 40% IF I WHERE YOU GUYS I WOULD WATCH JAPAN. WHEN THEY CRASH, PULL YOUR MONEY OUT AND THEN PREPARE FOR THE USA TO DO THE SAME. TO RISKY FOR ME AT THIS POINT IN TIME NOW.
Lendingtree:
Can you explain to me who is paying the, 18% late fee, 30% collection fee, and 35% of a unlisted lawyer fee? On the defaulted loans. Is this charged back to my $25.00 investment in the loan or deducted from my cash account?
Rod…
I would think when you buy the loan,you have the terms on that loan. Would you have put insurances on your loans. To sure your debit. respond back thanks
I retired at 70 with not much money in my 401K
I am scared to invest to stocks and so. I have lost already 70K in the past with stocks and mutual funds. I will be glad to have only 4-5% return but no risk. Can you advise?
structured assets
Sorry that your Avatar Gene Wilder has passed away…..He will be missed
Sounds a lot like the way so-called “prime mortgage” business started. Did I miss what happens if one is paid off early?
LendingClub lets borrowers pay off the full loan at any time, though it’s not as dramatic an impact as mortgages because you’re generally not paying a premium to get the loan and they have only 3 or 5-year terms anyway.
The monthly payments for a loan are much higher than the interest rate, so cash returns can seem high at first because the loans are fully amortized — each payment includes both interest and return of that share of the principal. You don’t get the principal back at maturity, it’s repaid through the life of the loan. That’s one way you could claim much higher monthly “income” numbers, if you include the returned principal in that amount — if you invested $100 you’d perhaps get roughly $120 back over three years (at a relatively high credit standard), but that would be in monthly installments so your actual payments would be about 3.30 a month/$40 a year, which seems like a lot of cash return from your $100 if you don’t think about it too closely… but it’s obviously not a 40% return each year because after three years you’ve just got your $100 back plus about $20 in pretax profit (though both Prosper and LendingClub offer IRAs, too — I didn’t check to see if those have fees associated with them).
These types of loans are not available in every state…perhaps that was in the article, as I skimmed it, knowing that there are zero possibliities for those of us in TN currently.
Good point — no, it wasn’t in the article but I should have mentioned it. There are a few states with more stringent regulations for banking that don’t allow peer-to-peer lending at all, and some that allow trading of but not origination of the loans. Tennessee apparently allows trading of LendingClub loans through the Foliofn network, but not origination through LendingClub.
The states that have full availability for originating and trading LendingClub loans are Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Prosper’s list is similar but not the same, there are a few states that allow Prosper but not LendingClub, and vice versa. And almost everyone except Maine and Iowa allows borrowing through these systems.
work out said of your state lines.
I’m intrigued by the peer-to-peer lending market. But I first want to see what the FULL-cycle returns are; i.e., after a recession and credit contraction.
Ryan Cole could have saved himself 7 months of investigation time, and just called Allen Stanford for his formula!
I found this discussion on the returns from personal lending interesting. I think I am going to really enjoy my newly found website StockGumshoe.com. Thanks for inviting me to join.
Best regard,
Joelujcky
I think I like what I just read. I am a regular Joe Friday: “The facts sir, just the facts.”
The $25 Retirement Notes just sounded like all the data were not presented.
I have an account with Funding Circle in the UK that I have been using for close to two years now and have been averaging 10.2% return after fees and bad debt (The platform has a US version also but I believe it only admits accredited investors). For unsecured loans the borrowers are private businesses (not individuals) with filed accounts (which in the UK are available to the public). They also offer secured loans that are mostly property development. In my experience the key success factor is diversification, significantly more diversification than what is officially recommended (3X for me). I’ve had defaults on unsecured loans and although there is a recovery service included in the fee they charge, the assumption is that an unsecured loan gone bad is a loss. Any recovery is a nice to have. There is a secondary market for loan parts that is quite acceptably liquid. There is clearly a platform risk, but Funding Circle seems to be one of the most solid ones (Their UK business is profitable). There is also the downturn risk which is to be seen. It has been an overall positive experience so far.
Had about 3k at Prosper for several years – several years ago.
We rarely strayed from what was rated as higher/highest quality notes.
Found it made little difference in defaults – a pattern emerged with a
significant portion of the notes – payment for 6 months of so, then a
sudden default.
With the payments from the class action and a few collections still
dribbling in, we might break even in a year or so.
Given our actual experience over several years, we’re unlikely to
try either lending operation again…but best of luck to all those
who do try them!
Thanks for the feedback — I assume that’s what happened to my Prosper account several years ago, though it was so tiny that I never paid attention to the settlements or their collections issues. That’s what worries me more about these than anything else, the very real chance that defaults could be far different from their model if the economy takes a big hit again.
I can see where these companies could quickly turn into a “Bernie” Madoff scam. No tanks. I went through a similar Bernie scam 2 years ago trading futures. The accounting rules were changed with respect to reporting to the Chicago Board of Trade resulting to one private bank going belly up because of fraud, by the owner of Pergrine Financial .
Yeah Peregrine aka PFG Best screwed a lot of us
Can you comment on the Daily Paycheck Retirement Plan put out by Amy Calistri of Street Authority. I have read the pitch and she throws out a few names but I would like to know if you have any additional thoughts on this advertisement.
I looked into the “Daily Paycheck Retirement Plan.” If you are going to do that you need to look at the ex-dividend date and the payout date for each dividend paying stock, ETF, MLP, mutual fund, etc., that you invest in. You will have to have the funds to invest in those stocks that pay a monthly dividends. It takes a large amount of cash to reach the point at which Amy Calistri has gotten to. I am small potatoes compared to most investors out there. I put $25 per week into my online brokerage account. When I reach a certain point ($100.00) I make a buy. After a lot of research and one false start. My online brokerage account collects on average $58.00 a month in dividends after four years of investing. I have gone from year one collecting $100.00 in dividends to this year 2015, expecting to collect over $600.00 in dividends. I collect most of the dividends at three times a month, the beginning of the month, the middle of the month and the end of the month. I would love to collect dividends every day of the month. I reinvest the dividends back into the stock they came from. Therefore, I enjoy seeing the number of shares of each stock grow and the size of the dividend grow larger each month. My investments, I hope, will help me to live better in my retirement years, about five to six years from now.
Hello
I have been with DPRP for some time now. and right they are in my RothIRA
Her newletters are really great
I hope this helps
Ron M
Lending Club adjusted net annualized return of 12.76% with 63 notes [mostly B & C] starting in Apr 2014. Only invest in loans with 36 month term & refinancing credit card debt.
Prosper adjusted net annualized return of 7.99% with 270 notes [mostly B, C & D] starting in 2009. Originally invested in 36 & 60 month loans, now only 36 month loans and more focused on refinancing credit card debt. Prosper used to give more details about employment and purpose of loan.
Availability of loans has decreased as more large entities have begun investing with Prosper & LC. LC sends email when you have cash available to re-invest. Prosper does not.
I have not seen any information on the amount of fees charged to the lender. Surely the organizers are not providing this scheme as a public sevice.
Lending Club:
The is a 1% fee on all money paid to your account (interest and principle).
Thus a payment of $1.00 will net you $0.99 (fee = $0.01)
The only exception is that during the first year of a loan, there is no fee on money paid in excess of the standard payment. Using same example, if borrower pays $2.00 (double the payment), the fee paid is still $0.01 during the first year. In subsequent years, the fee will be the excess payment too and thus the fee for this payment would be $0.02).
This exception was instituted in late 2014 after investors complained about borrowers that paid off their loan after only a few months.
This 1% fee is also applied to money received when selling through FILIOfn.
There is NO fee on new money deposited to your account.
You can only purchase notes using money that is already in your account at Lending Club.
You get no interest on non-invested money that is in your account.
I’ve had Lending Club accounts for several years, but recently they have been idle.
Pros: (1) Lending Club lets you download a complete database of all loans they have made, which I was able to analyze with a spreadsheet program and get some helpful conclusions about which kinds of loans to prefer.
(2) You can have these in an IRA but it is considered “self-directed” and therefore involves an extra fee of, I think, a couple hundred dollars per year. Lending Club covered (and perhaps still will cover) the fee.
Cons: (1) Altho you can sell the loans on Foliofn as noted, when I last checked (some time ago) there was no way to see actual transactions.
(2) The Board of Directors includes people I do not trust and would prefer not to be involved with. Of course, that is true of many other companies also.
And one caution: Lending Club will invest for you automatically if you’d like, but that seems to mean you’ll get the loans that none of the more sophisticated lenders wanted. I believe there are some independent companies which will handle the investments for you, but I do not recall their methods nor costs.
Thanks for the input — they certainly don’t indicate that the “automatic” loan portfolio building is some sort of second tier, where the “sophisticated” investors get to cherry pick the best loans first, but if that’s the case it could be a problem. Most of their loans fill almost instantly when they load them on the site, I think. Paying someone else to manage a lendingclub account, or spending large amounts of time selecting individual $25 or $50 chunks of loans, would remove any appeal for me. Not looking for another hobby or high-cost investment.
Although I’m late to the ‘party’, I wanted to report that I have invested in both Lending Club and Prosper since 2011 and have taken the auto-pilot approach where I specify the investment parameters, e.g. risk levels etc. that I want to follow. I only invest $25 in any loan that qualifies (to spread the risk); I have been receiving annual returns ranging between ranging from 6.5% and 9.5% and have been satisfied with the returns. I have heard stories of active investors with sophisticated decision rules achieving returns well over 15% on an annualized basis – I have no evidence of that but those folks may start an investment newsletter that Gumshoe can review.
(love your site and thanks for all your great efforts)
There are better ways to get good returns.
ETY – Eaton Vance Tax Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
As of 10/16/2015 close
ETY 11.31 11.02
11.34
11.31
Last Bid Ask Open
Current yield: 8.93%
52 Wk High 11.96 (6/19/2015)
52 Wk Low 9.64 (8/24/2015)
I realize that my way at looking at things might be a bit different than most but take a look at this.
I have 2 batches of this fund.
1st cost basis of 9.974 and it’s now at 11.31, nice gain. acquired in two batches
12/13/2012 Buy 300 @ 9.33
07/26/2011 Buy 200 @ 10.94
Additionally I keep track of dividends and now my “real” cash position in this is
6.542 as of 09-30-2015 which yields a 15.47 per cent dividend
2nd cost basis of 8.93, even better gain acquired 8/22/2011
my “real” cash position in this is
4.827 as of 9/30/2015 which yields a 20.97 per-cent dividend
after reading most of them, this sounds like I would be interested in. How do I get into this program?
Thanks, hnsberk
Just buy it, symbol ETY
this is looking very interesting .i want to know if this is only for the American .
how can i be part of it
If you have a broker that can buy on the NYSE then you should be able to get it.
I want to know how i can get started investing money.
If you have a broker that can buy on the NYSE then you should be able to get it.
You should spend as much time as you can learning about investing before you jump into any investment vehicle. Most brokers have a great deal of educational material available for little or no cost.
There are many so called investement gourps and I’ve been in few of them.
Somewhere I got some money, somewhere I lost…
Finaly I found one which is offering between 0.25% and 2% a day on your investment.
Tiy have few protfolios: Forex, Stocks, Commodities…
Minimal deposit is $20 and minimal reinvestment is $10.
Contact me on marjanmkd777 at gmail for more details.