Stansberry Venture

Overall Rating

Rating: 2.7/5. From 3 votes.
Please wait...
2.5
Rating from 17 votes
If you’ve subscribed to Stansberry Venture, please click the stars below to indicate your rating for this newsletter, and please share any other feedback about your experience using the comment box below.

Investment Performance

Rating from 6 votes
Rating: 3.2/5. From 6 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 1 Votes
  • 4 Stars 1 Votes
  • 3 Stars 2 Votes
  • 2 Stars 2 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Quality Of Writing/Analysis

Rating from 4 votes
Rating: 3.0/5. From 4 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 0 Votes
  • 4 Stars 1 Votes
  • 3 Stars 2 Votes
  • 2 Stars 1 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Value For Price

Rating from 4 votes
Rating: 2.8/5. From 4 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 0 Votes
  • 4 Stars 1 Votes
  • 3 Stars 1 Votes
  • 2 Stars 2 Votes
  • 1 Stars 0 Votes

Customer Service

Rating from 3 votes
Rating: 2.7/5. From 3 votes.
Please wait...
Your vote
  • 5 Stars 0 Votes
  • 4 Stars 1 Votes
  • 3 Stars 1 Votes
  • 2 Stars 0 Votes
  • 1 Stars 1 Votes

2
Share your thoughts...

avatar
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
buffalodieselwilliamwright Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

williamwright
Member
👍0
williamwright

Lashmet tends to be overenthusiastic about his picks. I was one of the first subscribers to the service he started before Venture. He had a very strong tout for TTPH in the 40’s, It had sailed through trials 1 and 2, and #3 was going to be a slam dunk, absolute certainty. Of course, #3 was a complete failure. The bottom fell out, as the stock dropped to 4. There was no apology. That was enough for me with Lashmet. I suppose some of his picks have done OK, but once burned, twice shy.

Add a Topic
5971
buffalodiesel
Member
👍27
buffalodiesel

Then why a 3 rating???????