What’s Jason Stutman’s $7 “iPhone Killer” Stock?

Unveiling the stock teased by Technology & Opportunity

By Travis Johnson, Stock Gumshoe, January 27, 2017

This teaser solution first appeared as part of a Friday File that was sent to the Irregulars on January 15, 2016, so it just passed its first birthday… but so many readers are asking about it again now that we’re re-posting it for everyone to read.

What follows has not been updated or revised since then, though the company Jason Stutman calls “the $7 ‘iPhone Killer'” had a good year into the Fall and hit $10 after three good “beat” quarters in a row and analysts raised their estimates for 2017 earnings expectations to 57 cents a share, getting everyone excited… then started to disappoint and received a wave of analyst downgrades and is now expected to earn about 40 cents a share. It’s now down to about $5.50 a share, I have not updated or revised the comments below and have not examined the company more closely in recent months.

The ad from Jason Stutman for the Technology & Opportunity newsletter, and this is the intro that is still catching the attention of Gumshoe readers:

“After years of getting pushed around by Apple, these three technology giants have finally had enough…

“Microsoft, Google, and Facebook have joined forces to create a groundbreaking device that will bring about…

“The Death of the iPhone

Wired magazine says it will ‘change the way we interact with the world,’ and this tiny, $7 tech company is the one thing connecting them all together.”

So that’s our challenge — who is it?

The big picture is, as you might have already guessed, “virtual reality.” That’s the prediction, that this currently “hot” technology of creating an immersive virtual world using headsets and other technology will change the way we do almost everything.

I’m a little nonplussed by how much of a “virtual world” I live in already, sometimes staring at my phone while there are real people around with whom I could be interacting instead, so the idea of all of us wearing augmented or virtual reality headsets and becoming even more depersonalized doesn’t appeal all that much… but there’s certainly a tech consensus that more virtual reality is coming.

And Stutman thinks he’s found the big “hidden” winner of the virtual reality gadget race… more from the ad:

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


“But here’s the kicker: the little known $7 tech stock that I’ve uncovered has found its way into not one, not two, but all three of the ‘iPhone Killer’ devices currently under development by Microsoft, Google, and Facebook.

“After taking a look inside these three devices, we know one thing for sure: Without this tiny firm’s proprietary computer chips, the ‘iPhone Killer’ wouldn’t even exist.

“Its components have become a necessity, just as Intel’s chips once were to PCs two decades ago.

“In just a moment, I’m going to explain exactly how you can profit up to 6,400% from this $7 ‘iPhone Killer’ stock as these three technology bellwethers attempt to knock Apple off its perch.”

iphonehammerMuch of the “story” here is that Microsoft, Google and Facebook, having “lost” the handset war, are doubling down to seize leadership of the next big gadget explosion, and that this will drive mass adoption and get lots of gadgets sold, and this “iPhone Killer” company will benefit.

All three of those companies trade at huge premiums to Apple largely because they’re not gadget makers, so I don’t know that this is a story of three losers trying to catch a winner… but yes, there is a race on to “win” the first stages of mass-market virtual reality or augmented reality devices.

What do we get by way of clues? Well, it’s mostly about the fact that this secret company provides a component that is used in the gadgets being developed by Google, Facebook and Microsoft — here are a few snippets that provide most of the hints:

“… that $7 tech company I’ve been talking about is providing a crucial component for the device: a special kind of computer chip that processes images for the Oculus Rift.

“Better yet, this company has found its way into the devices of two other technology giants determined to kill the iPhone: Microsoft and Google….

“…. this little-known company produces a special kind of display chip, essential for the HoloLens to work.

“And because Apple is being forced to poach Microsoft engineers, you can bet it’ll be following a similar design approach…

“Based on all our internal sources, this tiny company is the only place for Apple’s engineers to turn….

“One of the most telling indicators is that even technology giant Google relies on our $7 tech firm’s one-of-a-kind computer chips.

“Specifically, Google uses the company’s chips in its Google Glass devices.”

Yes, Google Glass was an early “beta” product flop, so far — but it’s not going away… at least not yet, Google is still working on the next iteration, widely expected to be an “Enterprise” version more specifically tailored to work environments. Hololens, if that reference confused you, is the Microsoft “Augmented Reality” goggle device that’s sort of a cross between Google Glass and immersive virtual reality — it’s expected to allow you to navitate 3D imagery while still being able to see the outside world, a bit like a fancy fighter pilot’s visor. That’s a different market, with quite different hardware and software, than the “Virtual Reality” immersive market with devices like the Oculus Rift and competitors, but apparently this company is working on chips for both.

Apple did “poach” a Hololens-focused employee from Microsoft last year and spur more speculation about Apple’s future product plans (though that kind of ‘recruiting’ is endemic to the tech world, so the coverage of this one hire probably says more about our need to grasp at clues than it does anything about the future plans or prospects for two of the largest companies on earth).

And one last bit about Google…

“… while the appearance of Google Glass may have changed, all patents indicate its core components have remained the same.

“Simply put, just as Facebook and Microsoft both rely on our tiny tech firm’s computer chips for their “iPhone Killers” to work, you can expect that Google will, too.”

Hopefully you can see that this is a somewhat tortured logical trail, and requires reading quite a few tea leaves to conclude that these four mega-tech companies all “depend” on this “little $7 company”… even if there is a lot of development going on in this sector, and a lot of hope for a big new market, we haven’t yet seen a mass-production virtual reality or augmented reality device from any of those companies, and virtual and augmented reality will remain a vanishingly small part of those companies’ product lineups for the foreseeable future.

But further cynicism has to wait until we name the actual $7 company being teased — so who is it?

Thinkolator sez this is HiMax Technologies (HIMX)

HiMax does indeed have chips in all of those preliminary VR and augmented reality products — they were in the Oculus Rift developers version and might well be in the consumer version coming out soon; they were in the first version of Google Glass and say they’re still partnering with Google on this project; they say they’re in the Hololens. None of that’s certain until the commercial versions release and there’s a “teardown” by some third party to identify the chips, and even then sometimes the display panels and chips (which is at least part of what’s teased here) sometimes don’t get identified.

Does that mean the stock is going to soar when volume picks up for these kinds of products? There’s some logic to that, in that they would be getting a new commercial-scale revenue stream… but don’t hold your breath about company-changing gains. Most projections are that this VR and AR segment will grow relatively slowly, hitting maybe 5 million units over the next year or so and perhaps 25-30 million annually within five years. From what I can tell, the chips from HiMax that drive graphics (helping to run the LCD screen, etc.) cost a few dollars each. Their chips for microprojection might be more specialized and expensive, that’s what would go into the Hololens and the Google Glass (the actual VR goggles, like the Oculus Rift, use something much more akin to a smartphone screen — it’s the software and lenses that drive the 3D image and feel of immersion), and they do have the potential to place several different chips in each device.

If there’s a total of $10 worth of HiMax chips in each VR or AR device, just to make up a number that’s somewhere in the realm of possibility, and 20 million of them are sold, both of which are probably optimistic 2017-2018 numbers at the earliest, that’s $200 million in revenue. HIMX is a fairly small fabless semiconductor company, and that would make a dent in their income statement — but it wouldn’t transform them into the next Intel overnight.

That kind of thinking requires looking way out into the future (to be fair, much of Stutman’s big numbers in the ad are for five and ten years from now), and making a lot of assumptions about the growth of the market, the anticipated failure of their competitors, and a “survivor bias” look-back at the past so you’re only dreaming about winners like NVIDIA in graphics chips, Intel in processors or Qualcomm in mobile chips and not remembering the many losers and failed or superceded products in those categories over the last 30 years. “Virtual reality will be big” is a consensus thought now, but it doesn’t mean that the winners will be known before mass adoption really catches on… or that the stock will go up without interruption starting now.

Better, I think, to get those “Virtual Reality transforms the world in ten years” thoughts out of your head and consider whether HiMax is getting new business today, and whether it is reasonably valued now and has some possibility of future growth to justify a better valuation over the next year or two. Right now, the business is driven by lower-end smartphones (touch sensors/LCDs) and high-end TVs as the “4K” upgrade cycle helps, they hope, to spur a recovery in large panel LCDs where HiMax has a good driver market share.

So where does HIMX stand in that regard? Well, there’s a pretty good analyst report from Credit Suisse here that gives some reason for optimism… but, again, that’s mostly because of the large panel display market. They give HIMX an $8.40 price target and they see them working their way out of the recent earnings/revenue dip (driven largely by the decline of the 3G phone market in China, where HIMX panels were apparently very popular) and getting back to 2014 numbers by 2017 — that $8.40 target is based on the stock trading at 21X their estimated 2017 earnings.

Which would be decent performance, to be sure — a gain of 20% plus from the current $6.80 or so. Of course, we need to look at these kinds of forecasts with a bit of skepticism — the same analyst at Credit Suisse had an overweight rating and a $15 price target on HIMX two years ago, in March 2014, when the stock was just about to fall off the cliff (it dropped from $14+ in March to $7 by May of that year in part because, in retrospect, they had run up to unsustainable levels due to Google Glass “story” enthusiasm). Back then, they anticipated that HIMX would earn 95 cents per share in 2015 — 2015 numbers aren’t out yet, but for the last four quarters HIMX earned 22 cents and analysts have very low expectations for Q4 (which will probably cut the year’s EPS down to 18-20 cents).

I don’t point that out to criticize Credit Suisse — HIMX has been popular for a while first as a growth name and, over the past year or so, as a possible value name after the drop, and most analysts have been pretty wrong about earnings as far as I can tell during the past two years or so of weaker revenues and shrinking gross margins.

Stutman and Credit Suisse are not the only ones excited about HIMX because of the growth potential in their microdisplay/virtual reality/augmented reality business, Morgan Stanley is also reportedly quite high on the stock following the VR enthusiasm at the Consumer Electronics Show, with a $9.50 target and as much as 18% of HIMX revenue in 2016 coming from augmented reality and virtual reality devices (mostly the former, presumably Google Glass and Hololens).

So there’s reason for optimism, perhaps, but there’s also the reality that a lot is riding on this emerging segment even if it won’t be a huge part of revenues right away — if the products don’t ship in high volume in the next few quarters, or if HIMX doesn’t have as much pricing power as analysts think, the weak margins could continue to pressure the stock unless the (much larger) Chinese LCD business (4K TVs or second tier smartphones) picks up quite strongly.

So far HIMX seems to have a good “design win” record in these emerging augmented reality devices and microdisplay technology (and do try to remind investors of that), but it’s really early days and that’s still probably a competitive segment given its novelty (Kopin is a smaller firm pushing into the area after working on LEDs for camcorders and similar stuff for a long time, there’s a SeekingAlpha writer who argues that KOPN is far ahead of HIMX on microdisplay) but there are undoubtedly others as well), and their other segments have even more competitive pressure possibilities.

Competition is the bedbug of semiconductor stocks — it’s always somewhere nearby, you often don’t think about it until you start itching, and investors often overlook just how much pricing pressure competition puts on suppliers who don’t have a sustainable patent lock on a business or a technological, reliability or brand advantage. As I’ve said before, it must be really tough to be in a business where the expectation is that your product’s performance increases dramatically each year as the cost is cut in half — but fabless semiconductor companies can also, when they have a hit product or a technological advantage, go from producing a million chips to producing 10 million chips and see their margins improve dramatically (fabless means they don’t own the fabrication facility — they just design the chips and sometimes invest in the specific tools and equipment for their chips at the contract manufacturer, which could be Taiwan Semiconductor or any of a few other chip foundries).

You can see the latest investor presentation from HiMax here, based on their third quarter. They will probably report their fourth quarter results, which I assume will be watched very closely (more for forward guidance than for quarterly performance), in about a month — but they did already preannounce, last week, that the results for the fourth quarter were slightly better than they had guided.

I’ve been burned too many times on small chip stocks to wager a guess on HIMX’s future based on just a couple hours of looking through the financials today, and I’m a little skeptical of predictions of huge VR growth in the next six months beyond the first spurt of orders for Oculus Rift from early-adopter gamers… but there is an analyst consensus that HIMX is going to return to growth after what has been a very lackluster year. And they have paid a dividend for several years, so there is some support from that if it continues — it’s paid just once a year, in the Summer, but last year’s payout, if repeated, would give a dividend yield of about 4.5%. The company has been public for almost ten years now, has gone through a few boom and bust cycles like many small chip companies, and is currently still below the $9 IPO price.

The average estimate for 2016 gives us a forward PE of about 30 after most analysts raised their estimates over the past month or two (at least partly because of augmented reality enthusiasm), and those analysts think earnings will grow in the high teens for at least several years. If they’re right, then you can probably consider the valuation reasonable… but it’s all about the future — 2015 has been terrible for the company, and the big turnaround in earnings growth for the next two years is certainly not guaranteed.

HIMX is still pretty expensive based on anticipated earnings, so it’s likely to be volatile around earnings releases as expectations get reset each quarter… any huge surge in the stock seems unlikely to me in the short term, but you never know whether the “story” will light up investors and get them enthused about the Hololens or something else.

So that’s what I’ve got so far… and while I’m tempted to buy lots of stocks these days as prices are falling, HiMax isn’t at the top of my list just yet. What do you think? Ready for a big bet on future augmented reality riches? Have stocks you like more for that story? Let us know with a comment below.


Irregulars Quick Take Paid members get a quick summary of the stocks teased and our thoughts here. Join as a Stock Gumshoe Irregular today (already a member? Log in)

114
Share your thoughts...

avatar
48 Comment threads
66 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
80 Comment authors
tobyzpetrogoldJairoNancyRalph Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Patricia
Member
πŸ‘689

Travis, have a heart. We’ve barely had time to recover from our horror over the “Evil Cardiac Killer” a few articles ago and here you are reminding us that this vicious “iPhone Killer” is still at large. Doors barred, shades and pistols drawn.

David B.
Member
πŸ‘853
David B.

Yes, please don’t kill my wife’s IPhone. It’s somewhat cheaper than psychotherapy!

Sarah10
Guest
Sarah10

Biggest laugh of the day. Thank you!

mylo
Guest
mylo

I’m reluctant to believe VR will ‘kill’ the iPhone, as Apple has such a great track record of innovating it’s products… In that mindset, Apple would simply adapt the iPhone product to the market much like it did so many times in the past.

That being said, all that cash in their bank account would make acquiring little companies like this much easier. Will definitely add this to my watch list.

saxysounds22
Member
πŸ‘5
saxysounds22

Vr does not appear to do everything the iPhone does so no, it should not kill it.

dcohn
Member
πŸ‘208

AR not VR

Phil
Guest
Phil

Apple HAD a great track record of innovation…. then Job’s died.
Not a single innovation since…. (I don’t consider an update to the iphone as innovation….)

digitriper
Irregular
πŸ‘19
digitriper

Why not just by Microsoft stock if they are turning out to be the leaders in VR?

Add a Topic
5971
grace
Guest
grace

big company stocks do not move as much as small company stocks (understatement: 2x vs 100x or even 1000x). also, one needs less money for the same number of stocks. but as they say, the bigger the net gain, the larger the risk.

Kimberly D Brown
Guest
Kimberly D Brown

Probably because microsoft is almost $94 a share and this one is $7

Bob Macoritti
Guest
Bob Macoritti

Also in those headsets and with other very promising cutting edge products, is Spectra7 Microchips on TSE, at a 46 cent price per share. Far greater upside here!!!

Add a Topic
1278
Arizona Slim
Guest

Hello Bob, do you have an OTC stock symbol for this outfit so I can look it up? I can’t get all Canadian stocks on my IB web page. Many thanks. Arizona Slim

Add a Topic
5971
Jitu
Guest
Jitu

SEV.TO

Kimberly D Brown
Guest
Kimberly D Brown

HIMX

Arizona Slim
Guest

Travis, I sent a reply to Bob Macoritti, either I goofed or he did not reply. Do you have an OTC symbol he is referring to on the TSE. I would like to look the 46 cent stock over. Many thanks. Arizona Slim AKA F H Major

Add a Topic
5971
Leo Graciano
Guest
Leo Graciano

SPVNF stock symbol, but now 1/28/17 it’s just over $0.30. Good Luck!

Add a Topic
5971
Arizona Slim
Guest

Many Thanks Leo

tobyz
Guest
tobyz

And this amazing SPVNF stock is now down to $.09 (12/4/18)!

Add a Topic
5070
tobyz
Guest
tobyz

As for HIMX, a year ago it was $13, now it’s $4 (12/5/18)

Add a Topic
943
Jairo
Guest
Jairo

Hi Bob 46 cent fir share can you tell me where i can buy those thank you

bconway
Irregular
πŸ‘66
bconway

I’m still waiting for the buyout of Sphere by Microsoft that Stutman said was imminent in July according to his boots on the ground.. It’s gotten a lot cheaper since then.

Princess Dejah
Member
πŸ‘7
Princess Dejah

Interesting idea! Thank you πŸ™‚

Jason Stutman
Guest
Jason Stutman

Hey bconway, Sphere really did fall apart on us, and at this point it’s looking less and less likely a buyout will occur. There was a LOT of chatter surrounding Sphere 3D when we first drew up that promotion, but we got sucked into the hype which was a mistake. The stock doubling is surely out of the picture right now, and ultimately there’s little denying it was a bad call. There’s definitely some irony here in that Sphere 3D was the single worst performing stock in our portfolio this year (and ever), but hey – you win some you… Read more Β»

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Peter Vogel
Guest
Peter Vogel

What about GO PRO. Is it low enough yet. Will they survive?
I just subscribed to your newsletter from your email and am looking around to see what people are saying about you. Virtual Technology is definitely the next toy to have until it becomes indispensable. I can’t wait! I hate Smart phones and I Pads. Why cant we just wear them? Makes sense to me..

Peter Vogel
Guest
Peter Vogel

Until it goes into a contact lenses. You heard it first here! That’s right. I am betting on 10 years.

Guest
Guest
Guest

Mission Impossible may soon become POSSIBLE!!…haha

Tony
Guest

Dry eyes not good for contact lenses, will always need external Feb or Borg transplant

Mdu
Guest

If one wants to buy shares for this iPhone Killer now, under which company name are available?

Add a Topic
5916
SoGiAm
Member
πŸ‘11365

Jason Stutman, and AR/VR deniers really need to get a grip and do there DD particularly addressing $NVDA πŸ™‚ Best ~ Ben

Add a Topic
4700
hendrixnuzzles
Member
πŸ‘9951

Hi Jason, whether your pick is good or bad it is refreshing to see someone replying in person to the comments and analysis posted about the pick.

rac4plt
Member
πŸ‘4
rac4plt

I’m still trying to understand this “NEW REALITY” we’re in,
……. Without augmenting it..! Help..!

Rusty Brown
Member
πŸ‘9
Rusty Brown

“fabless” – the design and sale of hardware devices and semiconductor chips while outsourcing the fabrication or “fab” of the devices to a specialized manufacturer called a semiconductor foundry.
Wikipedia
I learned a whole new word today, and it’s only 5:13 a.m. !

Shavian
Guest
Shavian

If Himax is ‘fabless’ who makes their wafers? The 3D aspects of their chips probably require VCSELs (Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers). If so, look at the world leader in Photonics and particularly the production of VCSELs on 6 inch wafers. It’s a company called IQE, listed on AIM and based in Cardiff, Wales. Its customers are the the likes of Lumentum and MAcom, the lead chip suppliers for the iPhone 8 due this fall. IQE has 80% of this niche market globally, so if AR requires VCSEL technology it seems likely that IQE are supplying HIMAX.

Shavian
Guest
Shavian

Edit: my apologies, IQE is listed on LSE, not AIM

bj
Guest

MANY people HATE wearing glasses and have adopted contact lenses for correcting their vision. NOW the “Virtual Reality” touts think people will wear headgear weighing 10, 20, 50 times as much as a pair of glasses???!!!!

Add a Topic
5072
Renee
Guest
Renee

All about dumbing down the population for The New World Order, Agenda 21 (if you believe in that sort of thing) I assure, it is no longer Conspiracy theory but reality.

Robin
Guest
Robin

I recently retired and want to invest some of my savings. This is the best group to listen. The hate groups are already killing off people here by secretive invasions in our homes leaving no trace of an illegal entry. Method of murder – poisoning to the third degree. They are doing it to me and I got secretive videos to prove it. My stepfather is helping them as well. I just told him that I wasn’t putting up with his $&*+ and axed our relationship. I do not know about agenda 21 but there is always unfortunately a sadistic… Read more Β»

Secret op
Guest
Secret op

Deliver me this video you speak of. It may be your only hope.

zilleric
Member
πŸ‘5

What’s your plan to assist Robin?

J C
Guest
J C

To Robin–I just wanted to say that if you wrote this, to test me, I still like you, because you seem like a nice person; but if you wrote this, because you really think this happened, I like you, because I can imagine what you’ve been through. It’s hard for me to shut up about being hypnotized, particularly because I was hypnotized to not shut up! I even get the skeptics, because I would have been one myself. I think investing with success to fight back is a great idea. It’s taken me 20+ years to even be able to… Read more Β»

saxysounds22
Member
πŸ‘5
saxysounds22

will people try to drive with these things on?

Denny kurian
Guest
Denny kurian

Should I invest in himax

copacetic98
Member
πŸ‘17

Yes

Christen
Guest
Christen

My google etc digging led to the same items (GoogleGlass, HoloLens (MS) and Ocular Rift (FB). Digging deeper I think it might very well be Holographix (HSTG in OTC market), Fo years its just 10 cents, then suddenly in jumps (52 cents, 75 cents, $1, $2, $5) it roared up from Apr 15, 2016 to $12 on May 31st. That is a whopping 11,900 % up. This gathered in chunks from different sites (each non-complete) such as Morningstar, Stockhouse, Yahoo. Most recent info is with Stockhouse showing $5.10 on June 13th. Tantalizingly obscure black-out since then, but maybe that is… Read more Β»

Add a Topic
285
Add a Topic
1823
ReRyRo
Guest
ReRyRo

And, from $12 a year ago to 80 cents today…yet another reminder of the vagaries of prognostication.

Roy Mira
Guest
Roy Mira

I just want to post heartful thanks to Travis Johnson for this superb article . Just thinking, I had to submit to the unending harangue by Jason Stutman about the “little unknown company” that will revolutionize the world of holography with its technology bla bla bla… to get nothing for it. Here I got who, what, when etc . If I have to follow some Market analysis it will be from Stock Gumshoe !

Add a Topic
4700
Add a Topic
5971