Become a Member

“The Forever NanoBattery: Makes old batteries obsolete and investors wealthy”

This one has come up in questions from readers quite a few times over the past few weeks that it’s been circulating, and the shares have already moved up a little bit with the company trying to get some press coverage tomorrow as they demonstrate their technology. So now seemed like a good time to mention them.

The teaser is from Untapped Wealth and editor Tim Fields, they’d like $99 from you for the special report and a subscription to the newsletter … Untapped Wealth isn’t covered by Hulbert and I’ve not seen their long term performance figures, so I have no idea whether or not they’re any good. But I do know you don’t need to subscribe just to find out the name of this “forever battery” company — not while the Gumshoe is on the case!

One small point gives me pause: Fields takes credit for recommending New Oriental Education (EDU), which we’ve seen teased several times in the past year, about a year ago, which is fine and probably true … but in so claiming he says that “The last recommendation letter I sent out turned $75,000 into $225,000 in less than 12 months!”

I don’t know how he tallies his performance, but the last two teaser stocks that I’ve sleuthed out that came with his name, both of which were sent and, one assumes, written within the past year, well after the EDU rec, would have lost money by my calculations: E-House (EJ) and Clearwire (CLWR). Not a lot of money, I admit, which might be a moral victory in this market, but the claim that the “last letter” he sent provided 200% returns rings a little thin with me.

But back to that forever battery … the hyperbole is strong within this one, my friends:

“It’s like getting a royalty check EVERY time someone buys a battery – anywhere in the world!” Tim Fields

… is how the ad begins — how often does someone quote themselves in the headline of a letter to add veritas? Odd.

And then goes on to say that …

“The Most Startling Innovation In 208 Years Is About to Be Unleashed On the Market… And once it is, you’ll never plug in your cell phone, iPOD, or laptop again!”

The ad is teasing a company that’s trying to develop and market a new battery design that relies on nanotechnology, which certainly doesn’t narrow the search down to a single company (there are at least dozens of high profile researchers working in this area both in large corporations and at Universities, and many several smaller companies counting on making the next breakthrough in this area, a few of whom are public)

So what do we learn specifically here?

First, the case is made that everything from mobile electronics to transportation is clamoring for a better battery. That we can all agree on, and we’ve seen battery companies teased before (like Ener1 for their version of the lithium ion battery for automobiles). Clearly, we’re not all going to have phones that are much smaller (like Qualcomm’s April Fool’s day HandSolo, perhaps?), or electric cars parked up and down our streets, until batteries get smaller, more long-lived, faster, and safer (no one wants their car to catch fire).

The tease is, of course, that Tim has discovered the company that can best provide deliverance from this widely accepted problem. And that’s a standard investment marketing ploy that we all see nearly every day — build up a problem that everyone has heard of or understands, explain why it’s so important to solve that problem … and then sell the one solution you have as the only solution, without mentioning the other possible solutions or competitors. His marketing letter is here if you want to whole spiel about battery evolution.

Not to cool your jets or anything — maybe this one is the “real deal” … let’s continue …

The promise of gains is more dramatic than most other stocks we’ve looked at — Tim is “so excited about this little company and … expecting its shares to multiply 3,600% within the next 12 months.”

So — does anyone want a three thousand percent gain? Anyone? Good enough? What’s the sweet spot — would it be better if he promised 500% gains and seemed more realistic, or 30,000% to really knock your socks off? Tough call.

So we’ll settle for the 3,600%. Let’s see how it works out for him.

So the special report is called “The Forever Battery: Making Today’s Batteries Obsolete… And Its Investors Wildly Wealthy”

And by way of teasing the details, here’s what we get:

It’s a whole new battery design, not just a new chemical makeup for the standard design.

It has relied at least in part on military funding for R&D, apparently part of a push after Gulf War I to make a better battery after some battery problems and failures in that conflict.

He calls it the “world’s first nano battery” and says it’s ready for production.

Are you getting our free Daily Update
"reveal" emails? If not,
just click here...


Of course, we’ve got a quote from the reputable news media to add some weight to Tim’s claims: ‘Christian Science Monitor says, “nanotechnology…has allowed the battery industry to begin to catch up with the electronic industry’.”

And here’s another excerpt that talks about what this battery company’s technology really offers:

“So how does this “forever battery” work?

“Simply put, its design keeps internal chemicals from mixing together – which is the reason even a dormant battery looses power.

“It also controls the battery’s internal reaction by isolating the electrolyte when power isn’t needed (which means it’s losing ZERO power when you’re not using it!)

“This is HUGE for manufactures because their batteries now have an infinite shelf life!”

So that makes for probably enough information for the Gumshoe to go on … the Thinkolator 5200, recently upgraded and glitch-free, spins quickly to action and tells us that this is…

mPhase Technologies (XDSL, trades over the counter)

This used to be primarily a DSL company, as you might suspect from the ticker symbol, but apparently got into the battery business a while back in a joint venture with Bell Labs/Lucent/Alcatel Lucent, or whatever they’re called today. The division that is developing the battery is called AlwaysReady, and they call it a “smart” battery. It is clearly focused on military and small consumer electronics applications.

The company’s own description of itself is as follows:

“mPhase Technologies Inc. (OTCBB: XDSL), through its wholly owned subsidiary AlwaysReady, Inc. is focused on developing and commercializing a new battery technology based on a well patented phenomenon known as electrowetting which provides a unique way to store energy and manage power that will revolutionize the battery industry.”

So … I’m no patent lawyer or engineer, and the only patents that are actually in mPhase’s name are for various DSL products and technologies, but they do say that core researchers on their team have developed at least ten patents for this nanobattery technology — one assumes that mPhase owns or has licenses to all of the relevant technologies, so hopefully that’s true.

Company officials reportedly said last fall that “if properly marketed” the battery could get 3-5% market share in the reserve and advanced battery markets within a number of years as their first stage of development. That’s a $1-2 billion market, apparently, though I haven’t verified that. So, take a wild guess and say $50 million in sales at some point in the next several years? That would certainly be significant for them, since, coincidentally, $50 million is just about the market cap of the entire company.

The Christian Science Monitor article that they quote is here, it’s about a year old — the way it’s written, it emphasizes the fact that mPhase’s technology is focused on battery shelf life, allowing batteries to keep their charge indefinitely when not in use. They also tout that they were mentioned in a Credit Suisse analyst report about nanotechnology, that report is here (pdf file) if you’re interested.

The careful reader might come away from reading both of those pieces and conclude that there are a whole lot of companies working in this area, but that there’s certainly no consensus about where technology or nanotechnology is going to take the battery in the next decade — maybe this mPhase technology will be significant, maybe one of the other companies or researchers in this space has something much better.

And if marketing is going to drive the success of this company in the next few months, they’ve certainly got a head start — they issue press releases at least as frequently as I issue self-important third person references (that’s pretty often for the mighty Gumshoe, as you may have noted). The latest one is for the first ever public demonstration of the battery, a demonstration that for God knows what reason is being held at AJ Maxwells in Manhattan. That’s a steakhouse. I don’t know why.

I mean, I do know why it’s a steakhouse — I don’t know why an advanced battery demonstration is taking place there. Do they need to ply investors and reporters with meat to get attention?

You can certainly read all their press releases from their website (their audio barrage starts immediately, check your volume), and view a video of their gee-whiz stuff, and read lots of other supporting information.

The stock has been up and down in the last year or so, driven no doubt by news releases and perceived developments and successes or failures in testing. They’re also going to need some serious partners to develop any capacity, so perhaps news of that has driven the price up or down recently as well. The shares are around 12 cents at the moment, after almost doubling after this particular marketing campaign and the company’s own PR machine ramped up for this upcoming demonstration, but the shares were much higher a couple years ago (I assume those higher prices in the further past were when they were concentrating on DSL technology, but perhaps they were previous iterations or future promises about the “forever battery.”)

So … this battery has been in development and testing for at least a decade. Is now the moment to get on board, and is this the breakthrough battery that’s really going to make a difference?

I’m a little bit intrigued, but I’m certainly not an expert on battery technology and don’t know how many carcasses of advanced battery companies we’re standing on as we consider the viability of this firm. I am fairly certain that his must be the company Tim Fields is touting for Untapped Wealth, but I’m equally certain that I’d like to know more before I put my money into it.

And they’re clearly still in the very early stages, even after 14 years of development, so I imagine that if this is really going to go up by 3,600% there might be time for a bit of patience. All the talk is still about what this battery could do, and the applications that might work, and the R&D contracts that they’re still winning. Nothing that I’ve seen yet about actual products, or deals with manufacturers, which would be the next very big step, and until there’s something more to sink your teeth into there’s no way for me to even guess at what a fair valuation for the company might be. Remember, even if you’re poky and patient you could still let it double a few times before you get on board and get an easy 30 times your money if it really is going to hit that 3,600% return from today’s price. And that’s assuming that it moves up in a straight line, starting tomorrow … which has happened, roughly speaking, never.

I would certainly classify these tiny OTC shares as a gamble — whether that’s what you’re looking for, and whether this particular company is the best gamble in the space? Well, as long as it’s your money, it’s your call. They are a real company, I assume (though don’t know for sure) that they’ve got either ownership or long term access to those battery patents they claim, they say they’ve managed to successfully manufacture the nano membrane in a commercial facility, and they are demonstrating something tomorrow, but that’s all I can say with any confidence. Oh, and they have almost no cash on hand, but also not all that much debt (only 1.6 million). Perhaps the demonstration will be key to raising more capital, since it’s certainly going to be a while before they become profitable. If they become profitable.

They’ve demonstrated this technology before in conjunction with Lucent, a couple years ago, but all that battery did was prove the concept and light a single LED. Hopefully this demonstration will be cooler — maybe they’ll fire up a batter powered blender and make margaritas for the crowd.

Feel free to share if you’ve got a feeling for this one. Or better yet, have done any research on them and their competitors.
And if you go to the demonstration on Thursday, let us know if you get any free meat.

Happy Investing, everyone.

full disclosure: I do not own shares of any company mentioned here, and will not trade in any investment mentioned for at least three days. I have received no free steaks, chops, or other cuts of meat for writing about this company.

guest

12345

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

61 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Charles Walter
Charles Walter
April 3, 2008 1:36 pm

OT This forum needs some direction. I wish I could present a good tease, but only can offer a stock with good potential. May I suggest you perform DD on Amerityre (AMTY). The company is about to become profitable. It makes tires, but ones that offer cheaper price, greater safety, better gas mileage, can be produced faster and can run after being punctured. check the company out.

Add a Topic
5971
John Smith
Guest
April 3, 2008 3:49 pm

This company is heading towards commercialization and in a very uniwue way. They are the only company I am aware of with a battery with these kind of charaterstics. The US Army validated it, Lucent Bell LAbs validated it , and most impressive and recent Credit-Suisse a world leading investment banking firm. This Smart NanoBattery sounds great and now that they are gettijng in position to market it , this could be well worth the risk/reward. The elctronic batter market is worth $55 Billion CEO of the company said at today’s demo. I was really impressed and it was a first class demonstration. Also, I want to add that the director of Investor Relations is doing a phenomenal job since cominjg on board in December. He was very helpful. I will take a risk with this one once profit taking settles and it looks healthy. Good Luck

Add a Topic
1614
Jim
Guest
Jim
April 3, 2008 5:16 pm

I have followed this one for years. Pump and dump stock the entire time. Guys like this http://www.lebed.biz have been paid good money to manipulate it. Beginning of each year.

Add a Topic
5971
brenda
brenda
April 3, 2008 6:12 pm

Thanks for the great comments, folks. And John, not to quibble, but Bell Labs helped to develop it, the Army has funded some of it’s R&D, and Credit Suisse has mentioned it. None of those sounds like “validation” to me, though we could quibble about what that term means. The science may have been validated, in my mind the investment thesis is a bit short of validation yet, which is certainly why it’s such a cheap, speculative OTC stock that markets itself with great enthusiasm.

Add a Topic
899
Add a Topic
5971
👍 7
Big Mo
Guest
Big Mo
April 3, 2008 9:43 pm

To answer Richard Lowman: Please see the Gumshoe archives for an entire write-up on Michael Cohen, Merl and his Doubling Stocks website.

G IMBURG
Guest
G IMBURG
April 3, 2008 10:32 pm

I have already said I like xdsl not withstanding the hype for several reasons. First, their technology could ultimately swallow the entire market once they go into full production and I suspect they could end up supplying the entire US military with this technology. The battery has been proven to work. I dont mean to pump this stock because I own it, but my scientific sense tells me this battery is special. The entire world could use this kind of technology. It takes a stock like this to go up 1000% about 3 years and I suspect you will never see this stock in the penny range ever again. Day to day trading is nothing once this stock starts to move. I have a 5000 share position and intend to at least double this position over time.

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
1614
Myron Martintakeprofits@rogers.com
Guest
Myron Martintakeprofits@rogers.com
April 4, 2008 8:36 am

I like the Gumshoes sober reality check, however on a risk reward basis a few hundred dollars is not much to put at risk considering the potential. Certainly not a stock to go whole hog on, but whether the HYPE leads it higher or the actual technology proves out, I feel confident people who don;t get greedy, I.E sell half on a double etc. will make money on this one, but what do i know, it COULD also go to zero nd prove to be a complete dud, only TIME will tell. Myron

Add a Topic
5971
JackB
Guest
JackB
April 4, 2008 9:56 am

In the nano battery field my money is on Altair Nanotechnology Inc

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
337
A Ghuman
Guest
A Ghuman
April 4, 2008 10:13 am

Note that the stock is now down to around 8 cents. so the 30% haircut pretty much happened within the 48 hours following their largest, “most impressive” demonstration. Sounds like a pump and dump to me (though I guess its now a pretty good deal if you believe in the technology, though the 52 week low is 4 cents, so there is more that it could drop).

Add a Topic
5971
G IMBURG
Guest
G IMBURG
April 4, 2008 3:03 pm

Bretts analysis is understandable . I too have 2 years of physics during my college years and a degree in chemistry as well. What his analysis critisizes is exactly why this battery has phenomenol potential. The electrowetting system, well documented, prevents discharge during downtime, and it is lithium ion unlike nickel hydride batteries. Yes, I have had batteries discharge during downtime, and the posts build the annoying leadsulfate and sulfuric acid compounds.
Lithium ion provides a better and stronger power supply than traditional nickel batteries and the M phase battery wont discharge while sitting on the shelf. If the company fails from undercapitalisation, it may well never get off the ground, but the US govt is BACKING AND FUNDING THE PROCESS FOR VERY GOOD REASONS. Certainly their patent is worth money. The process is also GREEN and not toxic to the environment. Adding up all the plus sides of the equation, It looks like win win to me.

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
2096
Add a Topic
964
Lou Giattino
Guest
Lou Giattino
April 4, 2008 5:28 pm

I have seen their website. They do not indicate any new electrochemical reaction. What they basically have is a “reserve battery”. That is, they maintain the reactive materials apart until the battery is required to be used. However, what is not said, is that once the reaction starts, it doesn’t go back to its reserve status. One major drawback is that you can’t check the battery in its reserve state to determine its status. There are other ways this has been done. For example, I took a primary battery that I had developed many years ago and discharged it 20+ years later. It produced 92% of its original energy. And the battery could be checked any time to determine its capability to function.

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Jess
Irregular
April 14, 2008 4:17 pm

what about the “Oil Vacuum”

Add a Topic
359
RockyG
Guest
RockyG
April 16, 2008 4:31 am

Interesting to note. Jim Jubak of MSN Money has put a mention on this stock before as something to watch. This is a pretty credible source. Also, a similar stock to compare with is OKME.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
Ritam18
Member
Ritam18
April 21, 2008 3:19 pm

If this is so credible, why do they need Jonathan Lebed to probote this? I have watched it for awhile, and the stocks goes up, then dies for awhile. Are you sure about the science behind this?
And what about the China Lake teaser?
Thanks, gumshoe, for your balanced reporting!

Add a Topic
2453
Add a Topic
108
Stlvelvet
Guest
Stlvelvet
April 28, 2008 4:56 pm

China Lake Teaser – I think this might be for real, however Geothermal according to my research takes forever to get to production. Instead, I’d take a good look at UGTH turned HTM @ AMEX. They are up and producing in 2008. Stock has been running btwn 2.20’s and 2.80’s, 2.71 today. They have a contract to sell 15 MW. The trick is to see how much money that will bring to the table. See Bonneville Power’s Wholesale rate table for a competitor’s intake. Even adding green credits how much is it worth?

Add a Topic
108
Add a Topic
200
Add a Topic
5971
Hilton X
Guest
Hilton X
May 17, 2008 8:26 pm

This forever battery from what I have read described in the many posts here, sounds like it is a ‘forever battery’ in a stand by mode as a battery backup if it is never called upon to provide power in the back up mode, i.e. it has infinite shelf life. I can see where the military would consider such a battery invaluable in certain applications such as some of the functions of a RPV where triple redundancy is provided to achieve a very low failure rate in a single mission vehicle. However, this is a misnomer of the description/definition of a ‘forever battery’, which therefore, would not be the solution to the limited battery life of batteries for all applications!

Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Add a Topic
1614
Rob W
Guest
Rob W
May 25, 2008 9:11 am

I bought XDSL @ .09 a share, with a stop-loss order at .08 a share. We’ll see if it tanks or gains, won’t we? lol

G IMBURG
Guest
G IMBURG
May 25, 2008 3:59 pm

To Rob W: Pre production stock trading is variable. The real test of the stock is whether they make money post production. I am betting they will and this is why I am accumulating.

Add a Topic
5971
Add a Topic
5971
EYOUNG
Guest
EYOUNG
August 29, 2008 11:18 am

On April 8, XDSL hit $.14,,, as of 11:30a.m. 08/29/08 it sits at $.0540,,, Hmmm, NOW, might be a good time to get in, depending on the Financials, and one’s ability to weather a volatile market,,, but a greater than 50% drop, since this write-up,,, Makes one wonder just where in the world this company is going~! My guess is, it has about bottomed out. The historical low has been $.04, and the historical High, in 1999, has been about $18.00,,, Worth a gamble?

William Nichols
Guest
William Nichols
December 29, 2008 6:05 pm

I also believe Altair Nano is in a better position with it’s lithium titanate oxide battery technology.The US Navy wouldn’t be so heavily involved if there wasn’t something to it!

Add a Topic
2096
Add a Topic
1614

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.

More Info  
9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x